• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

President Trump is still using his “old, unsecured Android phone”

SouthernDemocrat said:
I would rather see his supporters hospitalized for lacking the gene needed to detect irony and hypocrisy.
Click to expand...

I'm surprised any liberal ever detected their irony and hypocrisy .
 
SouthernDemocrat said:
They are not owned by Wired. They are owned by Conde Nast which also owns Wired, of which is a publication targeted to an entirely different audience. Be careful because on this one, your ignorance is showing and no amount of condescension is going to fix that.
Click to expand...



don't really care....


The hardware challenge of making a quality vibrator - How to make a quality vibrator.


Game developers speak out against potential ACA repeal Developers want obamacare

Dealmaster: Don’t miss out before the big game—here are a bunch of 4K TV deals best 4k gaming tv

“Teabagging” will get you banned from a major Killer Instinct tournament -Teabagging will get you banned from a game

Who Soiled the Toilet? is your next party game (about pooping on the floor) -Pooping on the floor


The site cant even format html so that the headlines appear correctly between URL tags. (I had to do it)


So If I want to know what the best 4k tv I should get so I can teabag people in video games while using the worlds best vibrator so I can poop on the floor, while keeping my obamacare, ARS Technica is the rag for me!

/facepalm
 
Last edited:
SouthernDemocrat said:
You are right: "Lock her up! Lock her up!" So when does he plan on turning himself over to the authorities?
Click to expand...

So Clinton should turn herself in and report to jail? Yup she should. She allowed highly classified material to be sent and received.

Trump has done nothing illegal on his phone! nothing! He just tweets. :2wave: And with great effect.
 
Praxas said:
According to you guys simple conversations are classified as they involved the president.
Click to expand...

So you can't prove that he is doing anything wrong. gottcha thanks for admitting it.
 
ludin said:
So you can't prove that he is doing anything wrong. gottcha thanks for admitting it.
Click to expand...

Yeah an unsecure phone is not doing anything wrong when using it for business. Got it. Your comments are nothing but partisan garbage and you hold no credibility when talking about Clinton. Thanks for proving that you aren't to be taken seriously.
 
Does any of us really know what phone Trump is using?
 
Praxas said:
Yeah an unsecure phone is not doing anything wrong when using it for business. Got it. Your comments are nothing but partisan garbage and you hold no credibility when talking about Clinton. Thanks for proving that you aren't to be taken seriously.
Click to expand...

prove he is using it for business. conjecture and substantiated accusations is not proof of anything.

ol yes we do because we have actual evidence that she was transmissing classified data over unsecure emails servers.
that is the difference.

that is the standard. so far you have proven nothing and have no proof.
that is why I keep asking you to prove that he is doing anything wrong.

and there is a reason that you can't supply that information there isn't any.
 
nota bene said:
Does any of us really know what phone Trump is using?
Click to expand...

not really. so far we have a lot of conjecture floating around. if he is conducting state or official business on his android phone
then I will be very concerned. if he is using the phone for personal use then I really don't care.
 
ReverendHellh0und said:
don't really care....


The hardware challenge of making a quality vibrator - How to make a quality vibrator.


Game developers speak out against potential ACA repeal Developers want obamacare

Dealmaster: Don’t miss out before the big game—here are a bunch of 4K TV deals best 4k gaming tv

“Teabagging” will get you banned from a major Killer Instinct tournament -Teabagging will get you banned from a game

Who Soiled the Toilet? is your next party game (about pooping on the floor) -Pooping on the floor


The site cant even format html so that the headlines appear correctly between URL tags. (I had to do it)


So If I want to know what the best 4k tv I should get so I can teabag people in video games while using the worlds best vibrator so I can poop on the floor, while keeping my obamacare, ARS Technica is the rag for me!

/facepalm
Click to expand...

Yes they mix in humerous and entertaining articles in with articles on security, science issues, tech policy and so on. Moreover, once again your ignorance is showing. Its not improperly formatted html, the site (like most modern sites) is CMS engine driven so that content is cached but formatting is dynamically generated depending on device and localization.
 
SouthernDemocrat said:
Yes they mix in humerous and entertaining articles in with articles on security, science issues, tech policy and so on. Moreover, once again your ignorance is showing. Its not improperly formatted html, the site (like most modern sites) is CMS engine driven so that content is cached but formatting is dynamically generated depending on device and localization.
Click to expand...



The tech I read don't include articles on vibrators, or poop.


It's sophomoric at best.


I know little about web programming, I do admit that. I have a department for that.
 
SouthernDemocrat said:
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy...-still-uses-his-old-android-phone/?comments=1

Don't worry, Putin's FSB really locked that phone down before they gave it to him. ;)
Click to expand...

Trump might be using two devices. If he doesn't send classified information over his private device then what's the problem? I can see where the president would want to keep a private phone for friends and family and one for official business. Clinton stated that she only had one device and later we found out that she lied. She also said that she never sent nor received classified information and later we found out that she lied about that also. I have no problem with the president using a non classified phone for personal contacts such as friends and family. I can't see what the problem is here.

I also did some checking into the author of the article. He is solidly anti Trump. That isn't bad but he isn't exactly objective.
https://twitter.com/andrewwrites?lang=en

Trump is using a classified device for business.
https://apnews.com/dad094622e4749e6858ad52bd7938676
Report: Trump has given up personal cellphone | TheHill

The original claim that he wasn't going to give up his old phone originated at the NYT where they said that he used the old phone when he was in his private quarters kicking back.
 
beefheart said:
Hypocrisy...the right is soaking in it.
Click to expand...

So you think if Trump was conducting business with top secret information being sent and received on an unsecure device, he shouldn't go to jail for that?
 
apdst said:
You said Clinton did absolutely (literally) nothing wrong.
Click to expand...

I certainly did not say that.

Moreover, even if Clinton was wrong to use a private email server, which she was, why does that make it OK for Trump to ignore established security policies? You are using the 5 year old's "But my sister did it too!!!" excuse.
 
SouthernDemocrat said:
I certainly did not say that.

Moreover, even if Clinton was wrong to use a private email server, which she was, why does that make it OK for Trump to ignore established security policies? You are using the 5 year old's "But my sister did it too!!!" excuse.
Click to expand...

So, she did break the law?
 
apdst said:
So, she did break the law?
Click to expand...

That's up to the FBI. Evidently they didn't think they could build a case.

If you think she broke the law, then why are you OK with Trump's sloppy security?
 
SouthernDemocrat said:
That's up to the FBI. Evidently they didn't think they could build a case.

If you think she broke the law, then why are you OK with Trump's sloppy security?
Click to expand...

Did she break the law, or not, in your opinion?
 
apdst said:
Did she break the law, or not, in your opinion?
Click to expand...

I don't know. That is my opinion. I am not a prosecutor. However, lets say she did. If she did, then why are you ok with Trump being so sloppy in regards to security as well?
 
SouthernDemocrat said:
I don't know. That is my opinion. I am not a prosecutor. However, lets say she did. If she did, then why are you ok with Trump being so sloppy in regards to security as well?
Click to expand...

You don't know?? Why don't I believe that? :lamo
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom