Apparently, you're brand-new to debating. Therefore, I will take it easy, so you can learn from your failures.
First, calling me, a LIAR does not support your case. That is your opinion, and an opinion is not a FACT. That's why you need support for your argument.
Second, giving me a link to make your case is laziness. Back your case by expressing your thoughts or ideas to debunk my argument. It seems you lack insight.
Third, the Labor Department has a different mission than OPM. "The purpose of the Department of Labor is to foster, promote, and develop the welfare of the wage earners, job seekers, and retirees of the United States; improve working conditions; advance opportunities for profitable employment; and assure work-related benefits and rights." Meaning the DOL mission is not track the federal government workforce. Otherwise, Yahoo would refer to the DOL data not OPM data charts.
Fourth, OPM is responsible for the successful management of human resources across every Federal agency which addresses the topic of discussion "White House falsely claims recent ‘dramatic expansion of the federal workforce."
Since I pounded your response without flexing, I advise not jump in the ring without doing your homework. Again, I'm taking it easy on you because you seem new to this. I have data sheets regarding the workforce of the Federal Government coming from OPM, so if you decide to reply be prepared to lose again.
Finally, if calling me a LIAR is the best argument you have prepared, please do not waste my time.
References for my case:
AllGov - Departments
https://www.yahoo.com/news/white-ho...nsion-of-the-federal-workforce-192109239.html
https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-ove...cutive-branch-civilian-employment-since-1940/