• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Flashback: In 2009, Networks Slobbered Over Obama’s ‘Sacred Event’

Absentglare said:
No, it wasn't, you didn't specify individuals. And i know of no accusation about right wing individuals being targeted for audits.
Click to expand...

Yes. I did. I even quoted you what I was replying to and I was arguing such action should not be taken against those on the LEFT.

You need to get past your need to argue with me and read. Seriously.
 
chuckiechan said:
Flashback: In 2009, Networks Slobbered Over Obama?s ?Sacred Event?



It's hard to fathom that the MSM is so FOS, and so partisan they don't think anyone will notice they are pouting like little children. Not to mention that they are incouraging violence by the left, and their silence is an indication of complicity.

I think the IRS should audit them all up and check to see that they are paying taxes on the money they were paid as "casual labor" to be anarchists at the inauguration.
Click to expand...

It's hard to polish a turd like Trump.
 
Anthony60 said:
Uhh... isn't he biracial?
Click to expand...

In the days of chattel slavery would they have regarded him as biracial or black? In the segregated South would they have regarded him as biracial or black? You know the answer.
 
OpportunityCost said:
Yes. I did. I even quoted you what I was replying to and I was arguing such action should not be taken against those on the LEFT.

You need to get past your need to argue with me and read. Seriously.
Click to expand...

Not at all, you are moving the goalposts. What makes you think i'll let you get away with redefining your argument after i explain how the IRS is legally obligated to discriminate with respect to politics?
 
Absentglare said:
Not at all, you are moving the goalposts. What makes you think i'll let you get away with redefining your argument after i explain how the IRS is legally obligated to discriminate with respect to politics?
Click to expand...

...because that WAS my original argument. I am spelling it out for you again because you didn't get it the first time because you are reading what you want to and not what I ACTUALLY typed.

This is surreal how terrible your responses have been.
 
OpportunityCost said:
...because that WAS my original argument. I am spelling it out for you again because you didn't get it the first time because you are reading what you want to and not what I ACTUALLY typed.

This is surreal how terrible your responses have been.
Click to expand...

When did they target individuals for auditing based on politics? Or are you inventing a new problem straw to grasp for?
 
Absentglare said:
When did they target individuals for auditing based on politics? Or are you inventing a new problem straw to grasp for?
Click to expand...

...go read the thread. You are picking one of the most idiotic fights in the history of this forum. I even quoted the relevant posts for you and you STILL don't get what I am replying to...because you didn't read it, you just reacted.
 
OpportunityCost said:
...go read the thread. You are picking one of the most idiotic fights in the history of this forum. I even quoted the relevant posts for you and you STILL don't get what I am replying to...because you didn't read it, you just reacted.
Click to expand...

Holy ****, you're right. This was my mistake.

Sorry OC.
 
SouthernDemocrat said:
In the days of chattel slavery would they have regarded him as biracial or black? In the segregated South would they have regarded him as biracial or black? You know the answer.
Click to expand...

You are kidding, right? I couldn't careless what they did hundreds of years ago. Was 2+2 still four during the days of slavery?

It's not up for debate. He is biracial. He is half white, and half black.
 
Anthony60 said:
You are kidding, right? I couldn't careless what they did hundreds of years ago. Was 2+2 still four during the days of slavery?

It's not up for debate. He is biracial. He is half white, and half black.
Click to expand...

And you are missing the point. Society would have always considered him black. That is why we consider him the first black president.
 
SouthernDemocrat said:
And you are missing the point. Society would have always considered him black. That is why we consider him the first black president.
Click to expand...

You are talking about some other issue. I was pointing out the truth, that he is actually our first biracial president. Not a debatable issue. It's just wrong to call him the first black president. What would you call the first african american with two black parents that is elected? Answer; the first black president.
 
Mason66 said:
How did so many people show up when the economy had just crashed and nobody had any money?
Click to expand...

How pathetic...

Before the election you guys were preaching about how the left is a bunch of out of touch rich elitists who can't relate to 'Merica. Now we are all a bunch of bumpkins who can't afford to go to D.C.
 
Cardinal said:
What a strange and incoherent thread this has been. What was the intended message of the OP, exactly?
Click to expand...

Liberals suck and own the media and Conservatives are victims. I think that was the gist of it.
 
Anthony60 said:
You are kidding, right? I couldn't careless what they did hundreds of years ago. Was 2+2 still four during the days of slavery?

It's not up for debate. He is biracial. He is half white, and half black.
Click to expand...

Funny how this used to be the conservative approach to who is and isn't black...


Funny how this changes for them when it's convenient.
 
poweRob said:
Funny how this used to be the conservative approach to who is and isn't black...


Funny how this changes for them when it's convenient.
Click to expand...

Funny how the democrats were the party of the KKK.

Funny how this has nothing to do with our first biracial president.


Sent from my iPhone 8 Pro using Tapacrap
 
poweRob said:
How pathetic...

Before the election you guys were preaching about how the left is a bunch of out of touch rich elitists who can't relate to 'Merica. Now we are all a bunch of bumpkins who can't afford to go to D.C.
Click to expand...

Did you not understand the question?
 
Anthony60 said:
Funny how the democrats were the party of the KKK.

Funny how this has nothing to do with our first biracial president.


Sent from my iPhone 8 Pro using Tapacrap
Click to expand...

Funny how you dodge, deflect and spin so much.
 
poweRob said:
Funny how you dodge, deflect and spin so much.
Click to expand...

Mw9QE.gif
 
poweRob said:
Funny how you dodge, deflect and spin so much.
Click to expand...

LOL, I'm dodging? That's a good one. I said he's biracial, that's it. Not even a debate. But you've gone off all over the place on some crazy quest to make him black.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom