• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Fox hoped Tucker Carlson could live up to Megyn Kelly's popularity.

516 million. More possible viewers. Laugh all you want.

HOLD THE PHONE!

That is 516 more american homes, not 516 million people... Unless you believe that each American household has 1 million people living in them. Besides, there are only 320 million people in the US to begin with.

Now I do believe that retraction is in order.

.
 
Last edited:
HOLD THE PHONE!

That is 516 more american homes, not 516 million people... Unless you believe that each American household has 1 million people living in them. Besides, there are only 320 million people in the US to begin with.

Now I do believe that retraction is in order.

.

My bad... 516,000. Half a million... Like I had said before. But you knew that.
 
My bad... 516,000. Half a million... Like I had said before. But you knew that.

WRONG AGAIN!!!!

Its 516... Half a thousand... Not half a million.

How about that retraction now?
 
WRONG AGAIN!!!!

Its 516... Half a thousand... Not half a million.

How about that retraction now?

Estimated # of Homes (000)

Fox News: 93,915
MSNBC: 93,399​

How do you read that? That fox is only in a total of 93,915 home across the country? Or would that be 93,915,000 homes?

Yeah, would you like to restate your position now?
 
Last edited:
WRONG AGAIN!!!!

Its 516... Half a thousand... Not half a million.

How about that retraction now?

Where'd ya go Grim? You were all over me just a second ago. :lol:
 
If she lands in MSNBC. I can't seem to find where they say exactly where she's going. They say "NBC or MSNBC". Maybe they aren't sure what they are going to do with her.

She wouldn't scoop so low as to being on MSNBC but it could give them a much needed shot in the arm at being "fair and balanced". Hey, maybe her and Rachel Maddow could be co-hosts on some sort of Hannity and Combs like take-off.
 
She wouldn't scoop so low as to being on MSNBC but it could give them a much needed shot in the arm at being "fair and balanced". Hey, maybe her and Rachel Maddow could be co-hosts on some sort of Hannity and Combs like take-off.

I think Megyn is going to take a hard turn left.
 
I think Megyn is going to take a hard turn left.

Well, she already took a turn to the left while at Fox. I personally think she is hard core right, except when it comes to women's issues, an interesting niche. If I am correct, she could actually be good for conservatism in bringing more women into the Republican party while maybe helping the right steer closer to women's issues. I've been saying for a long time now that Republican women need to stand up together and declare that there is not a war against women.
 
Back
Top Bottom