• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

35-Page Report Alleging Trump Was "Cultivated, Supported And Assisted" By Russia

So the Paul Mantafore collusion has already been investigated? How is that possible when it just came to light?

So the idea that the Russians have a blackmail file ready to pressure Trump with scandalous things in it that could destroy him? How is that possible when it just came to light?

Neither of those groups that you mentioned has the powers that government does to investigate this far far more thoroughly especially when it involves international dealings.

How is it possible?

It takes some ingredients that are becoming well known.

Vengeful, gullible, biased journalist hacks.

A vengeful, gullible, biased target audience.

A vengeful, gullible, biased MSM.

Mix together, and these alt-left dog whistles achieve the desired result, and all the players expose how intellectually vacant they are.
 
So the Paul Mantafore collusion has already been investigated? How is that possible when it just came to light?

So the idea that the Russians have a blackmail file ready to pressure Trump with scandalous things in it that could destroy him? How is that possible when it just came to light?

Neither of those groups that you mentioned has the powers that government does to investigate this far far more thoroughly especially when it involves international dealings.

The Guardian reported that the FBI attempted to gain warrants through the FISA courts for just that.
They were denied, but there are claims that they were later approved, when they narrowed their scope.

This "report" is loaded with with red flags all over it, indicating that one should approach it with high levels of skepticism.
 
Law enforcement is the government.
Multiple media outlets have sat of this, Hillary's campaign had this, why didn't they release it?
Mother Jones, of all sources had this and chose not to run it, because of the questionable nature of the material.

This sounds like the anti Trump "pizzagate."
The claims being made, are highly suspect.

Do you want this thoroughly investigated by COngress?
 
How is it possible?

It takes some ingredients that are becoming well known.

Vengeful, gullible, biased journalist hacks.

A vengeful, gullible, biased target audience.

A vengeful, gullible, biased MSM.

Mix together, and these alt-left dog whistles achieve the desired result, and all the players expose how intellectually vacant they are.

Do you want this thoroughly investigated by COngress?
 
Do you want this thoroughly investigated by COngress?

That depends.
Considering the source of the material and the lack of supporting evidence others have yet to find, I'm not sure it warrants further investigating.
With that said, if they were to do so in a non politicized manner, I probably would care all that much.
 
The Guardian reported that the FBI attempted to gain warrants through the FISA courts for just that.
They were denied, but there are claims that they were later approved, when they narrowed their scope.

This "report" is loaded with with red flags all over it, indicating that one should approach it with high levels of skepticism.

The area that must be pursued and pursued vigilant and thoroughly is the claim that Paul Manafort and other Trump campaign figures worked directly with Russians to maximize the damage to Clinton and to advance Russian efforts to elect Trump.

Even if one wants to forget about the urination nonsense - this charge connects the dots directly from the Russians to Wikileaks to the Trump campaign at rather high levels. This demands a thorough investigation.
 
I think Congress has more important priorities than chasing fiction created and spread by the alt-left MSM.

So what would be a firm NO from you.
 
The area that must be pursued and pursued vigilant and thoroughly is the claim that Paul Manafort and other Trump campaign figures worked directly with Russians to maximize the damage to Clinton and to advance Russian efforts to elect Trump.

Even if one wants to forget about the urination nonsense - this charge connects the dots directly from the Russians to Wikileaks to the Trump campaign at rather high levels. This demands a thorough investigation.

I think the majority of people are following a trail of confirmation bias.
That's to be completely honest.

TV is selling you the head movie that fits your general belief structure.
 
I think the majority of people are following a trail of confirmation bias.
That's to be completely honest.

TV is selling you the head movie that fits your general belief structure.

Do you think there needs to be a thorough investigation into the allegations that the Trump campaign colluded with the Russians?
 
Do you think there needs to be a thorough investigation into the allegations that the Trump campaign colluded with the Russians?

I say do a thorough investigation, and if they don't find anything significant, then whatever.
 
Didn't they already do this and didn't they already conclude that they weren't?
I'm fairly certain the FBI already did this.

If that is so, a formal and complete report needs to be issued on the subject. I have not seen anything approaching that.
 
I think Congress has more important priorities than chasing fiction created and spread by the alt-left MSM.

Like the fake plans to "lock the bitch up" and make Mexico pay for a border wall?:2razz:
Sure... they better get right on it.
 
This "report" lacks credibility.
Multiple news outlets refused to report on it because it seems very likely to be made up smear.
Why would multiple news outlets sit on such a juicy story like this?

You know why.

Where is the confirmation that there already has been an investigation of the claim that Trump campaign officials collided with the Russians regarding the wikileaks info and damaging Clinton to help Trump get elected?
 
So what would be a firm NO from you.

Well done, you figured it out. :applaud

Having Congress chase the fake news being spread by the frauds in the MSM would not be the mandate the voters made clear last November.
 
Where is the confirmation that there already has been an investigation of the claim that Trump campaign officials collided with the Russians regarding the wikileaks info and damaging Clinton to help Trump get elected?

I think it's rather moot that if they didn't find a Trump/Russia connect, they probably won't find a Trump/Russia/Wikileaks connection.
Although if you think they should investigate Wikileaks/Russia connection, I'm fine, again as long as it's not politicized and is just matter of fact.
With the caveat that the evidence be publicly available.
 
Well done, you figured it out. :applaud

Having Congress chase the fake news being spread by the frauds in the MSM would not be the mandate the voters made clear last November.

How is a report from the US intelligence community given to Trump and Obama fake news?
 
Last edited:
I think it's rather moot that if they didn't find a Trump/Russia connect, they probably won't find a Trump/Russia/Wikileaks connection.
Although if you think they should investigate Wikileaks/Russia connection, I'm fine, again as long as it's not politicized and is just matter of fact.
With the caveat that the evidence be publicly available.

So you cannot show me where this has already been investigated and the matter disposed of?

Read this

Lawmakers broach possible Trump campaign coordination with Russia - POLITICO

Members of Congress made clear Tuesday they're increasingly willing to broach a taboo topic: possible coordination between the Trump campaign and the Russian government. Their emboldened approach comes amid a bombshell CNN report that intelligence officials last week presented Trump with alleged claims by Russian operatives that they have compromising information on the president-elect. According to CNN, Trump was also presented with allegations there was an "exchange of information" during the campaign between his surrogates and intermediaries for the Russian government.


Trump responded Tuesday night with an emphatic all-caps tweet: "FAKE NEWS - A TOTAL POLITICAL WITCH HUNT!"

The subject is one lawmakers have largely avoided discussing since the presidential election, even as anti-Trump advocacy groups have sounded alarm bells about the president-elect. But that changed Tuesday, during a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing on Russia's meddling in November's election.

The hearing followed Friday's release of an unclassified version of an intelligence community investigation into Russia's interference in the election, which said Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence operation to undermine Hillary Clinton and help Trump. During the intelligence hearing, Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) noted the extensive ties between Trump advisers and the Russian government and pointed to an interview shortly after the election in which a top Russian diplomat said his government had had "contacts" with the Trump campaign.

Apparently THIS HAS NOT already been investigated since Congress is only now expressing some interest in it.
 
'As reported moments ago, CNN is leading with a story about a 35-page dossier compiled by a former member of British intelligence, which had been distilled into a 2-page appendix presented to Trump last Friday by the US intel community, and which contains "explosive, but unverified, allegations" that the Russian government has been "cultivating, supporting and assisting" President-elect Donald Trump for at least 5 years and "endorsed by Putin" gained compromising information about him, with the aim of "encouraging splits and divisions in the western alliance."

The memo has allegedly been circulating among elected officials, intelligence agents, and journalists for weeks.'


NOTE: You have to go to the website - via either link - to see the document (I do not know how to post it here).

Here Is The Full 35-Page Report Alleging Trump Was "Cultivated, Supported And Assisted" By Russia | Zero Hedge

https://www.scribd.com/document/336222345/Trump-Intelligence-Allegations#from_embed




Thoughts?

Putin is gaining another point. Just by this being published distrust is stoked and legitimacy is undercut all around. The problem is that we had two candidates that offered this kind of flank to nonlinear war.

In this case it all too believable. Does Trump want pictures of a fat old man humping or being humped in the media? Does he want details true or not of affairs and deals with shady Russian agents across the front page? True or not these things would look right, feel true and be in first class format that professionals are want to produce.
 
Last edited:
Like the fake plans to "lock the bitch up" and make Mexico pay for a border wall?:2razz:
Sure... they better get right on it.

No, it would be like addressing the failure of Obamacare, undoing crushing Progressive rules and regulations on business, correcting the globalist agenda that has left so many in dire economic straits.

Those kind of things are priorities.

You guys can bark at all these dog whistles, and it is quite entertaining to see such gullibility exposed on all levels, but there is more important work for Congress to do.
 
So you cannot show me where this has already been investigated and the matter disposed of?

Read this

Lawmakers broach possible Trump campaign coordination with Russia - POLITICO



Apparently THIS HAS NOT already been investigated since Congress is only now expressing some interest in it.

Well, I wouldn't imagine Congress investigate this "report" because it's rather ****.
Allegedly John McCain had this report and if he straight up believed it without evidence, he's an embarassment.
 
Back
Top Bottom