• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Completed Wisconsin recount widens Donald Trump's lead by 131 votes

Editor's correction in red:

It's going to be a long 8-years for Lib cry babies. Yes, this is going to be fun !!

This recount was a prime example of the Left being hypocrites.

It's been tremendous fun to see.

Watching Trump steamroller the Left will be even more fun.:popcorn2::popcorn2:

The Left's post-election behavior has been just what the Doc ordered. If Trump had any feelings of good will, my guess is this has pretty much shattered them.

Great cabinet... people who have done.
 
Last edited:
Why is it a problem for you that there's more time for people to vote?

What is it about that, that you find so offensive?

why are you arguing something I never said?

I simply pointed out that people were perfectly fine without early voting before.
 
Amazing the glorious Media Bias Warrior, Defender of Truth (and James O'Keefe) And all things Good in the world thinks HotAir is an outstanding website.

Soldier on Grim, you hypocrisy is constantly on display.

Yes, I do like the website and exactly why shouldn't I like it? Yes it is right leaning website, but they do not manufacture the news and information they post.

So I will ask you again... Please produce an example of a story they have posted that you find objectionable, or not credible? If you can't do that, then the only conclusion that can be reached is that you are full of crap.

.
 
Libbos can't do that!...lol

Substantiating their BS seems to be something many of them simply aren't capable of doing. BoggieBoy is the perfect example of one such liberal.
 
Substantiating their BS seems to be something many of them simply aren't capable of doing. BoggieBoy is the perfect example of one such liberal.

That's why they throw insults and accusations around the way they do. Kirsten Powers explained it perfectly in her book, when she said that, "illiberals", are incapable of presenting an argument, so they dehumanize their opponent by calling them racists, sexists, homophobes, liars, stupid, the list goes on.
 
That's why they throw insults and accusations around the way they do. Kirsten Powers explained it perfectly in her book, when she said that, "illiberals", are incapable of presenting an argument, so they dehumanize their opponent by calling them racists, sexists, homophobes, liars, stupid, the list goes on.

And that from a life long liberal... Someone the left will have a hell of a time trying to discredit.
 
And that from a life long liberal... Someone the left will have a hell of a time trying to discredit.

That's exactly right. You oughta read her book. She beats the **** out of them.
 
Why is it a problem for you that there's more time for people to vote?

What is it about that, that you find so offensive?

Although not directed at me, here's my problem with it...

In my opinion, a political campaign is like a sporting event that isn't over until election day. When you let people vote early, you are allowing them to declare a winner before the game is over.

What happens if on election day, it is discovered that one candidate is actually a pedophile who's been sexually abusing and exploiting children for 20 years? When you have 30 million people who have already voted for that candidate, I'd say we're screwed.

.
 
I hope that the Left is all done now.
 
I hope that the Left is all done now.

No. Don't count on that. They aren't rational. They're going after Electors and grabbing pacifiers from little babies in strollers now.
 
No. Don't count on that. They aren't rational. They're going after Electors and grabbing pacifiers from little babies in strollers now.

When they start kicking puppies, I'll worry.
 
I've personally told you before that the issue isn't being "too stupid." I've explained reasons why people might not have an ID on the official list.

And yet you continue to repeat your racist lie, you still think the only reason black people might have a lower percentage of meeting the ID requirements is that they're too stupid.

There's a pretty telling video out that shows a lot of black folk thinking the leftist claim that black people cant get ID to vote is pretty stupid.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
There's a pretty telling video out that shows a lot of black folk thinking the leftist claim that black people cant get ID to vote is pretty stupid.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You guys keep thinking this is some black and white situation. Nobody said it only affects black people, and nobody said black people can't get IDs.

This has always been about playing the odds. Finding the little percentage margins here and there, making tweaks that very slightly affects black voters more than white voters. (because black voters vote Democrat)

The North Carolina situation is as blatant as it gets, but you people still refuse to recognize the situation.
 
Editor's correction in red:



This recount was a prime example of the Left being hypocrites.

It's been tremendous fun to see.

Watching Trump steamroller the Left will be even more fun.:popcorn2::popcorn2:

The Left's post-election behavior has been just what the Doc ordered. If Trump had any feelings of good will, my guess is this has pretty much shattered them.

Great cabinet... people who have done.

And that zero to do with me
 
They are capable of far more whining and crying, so don't hold your breath.

.

Crying and whining, thats the Don to a T. What a man child you righties voted for.
 
You guys keep thinking this is some black and white situation. Nobody said it only affects black people, and nobody said black people can't get IDs.

This has always been about playing the odds. Finding the little percentage margins here and there, making tweaks that very slightly affects black voters more than white voters. (because black voters vote Democrat)

The North Carolina situation is as blatant as it gets, but you people still refuse to recognize the situation.
:lamo

Bull****, Deuce. Every time it comes up the first thing that spills out of leftists mouths is THATS RACIST!!! And if you think that hinders discussion on the topic, then maybe instead of trying to deny what every single person on this site knows, you should consider if maybe you havent been part of the problem.
 
Quite the opposite: time well spent.. it validated the original count, which is what needed to happen in such a close election.

I understand your point, but he didn't win by a few hundred votes, or even a few thousand... Trump won by nearly 23,000 votes.

.
 
I understand your point, but he didn't win by a few hundred votes, or even a few thousand... Trump won by nearly 23,000 votes.

.

I understand.... but there are judgements made in vote that lead to votes being disqualified or turned to provisional ballots. I for one, was not certain how big a population that was. We also had allegations of tampering (though that was more about tampering in the election than tampering with machines).... Moreover, in any election, there are games that are played, though this was not an exercise in looking at voter suppression.

Given the that the election was decided by 80,000 votes, I think a thorough look at the process and result was important to happen to remove any doubt.
 
I understand.... but there are judgements made in vote that lead to votes being disqualified or turned to provisional ballots. I for one, was not certain how big a population that was. We also had allegations of tampering (though that was more about tampering in the election than tampering with machines).... Moreover, in any election, there are games that are played, though this was not an exercise in looking at voter suppression.

Given the that the election was decided by 80,000 votes, I think a thorough look at the process and result was important to happen to remove any doubt.

There were states that the margin of victory was closer than it was in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania or Michigan (like for instance New Hampshire), but Jill Stein and her people were only interested in states where Donald Trump won. The only doubt about the results in those states was manufactured by her and her allies and wasn't based on anything real.

I'm not saying that I oppose election recounts, I just oppose people calling for recounts for nothing more than their own personal, financial and partisan political gain... which is exactly what Jill Stein did.


.
 
Last edited:
Can we deem Stein's efforts a waste of time yet?


I don't think so.

It was a very close state in a very close election.

I see nothing wrong with making certain of the results.
 
I don't think so.

It was a very close state in a very close election.

I see nothing wrong with making certain of the results.

there was nothing close about it now he has a bigger lead than he did before the recount.
so now Clinton and stein can go lick their wounds twice.

I bet Clinton is about ready to throttle stein.

Not only did I lose once. now I lost 2 times and it was worse than the first.
 
I understand.... but there are judgements made in vote that lead to votes being disqualified or turned to provisional ballots. I for one, was not certain how big a population that was. We also had allegations of tampering (though that was more about tampering in the election than tampering with machines).... Moreover, in any election, there are games that are played, though this was not an exercise in looking at voter suppression.

Given the that the election was decided by 80,000 votes, I think a thorough look at the process and result was important to happen to remove any doubt.

LOL no evidence of hacking or any other tampering. ruled on by at least 2 out of 3 judges.
and the 3rd judge would have done it as well if the recount hadn't been 70% complete.
yet a judge did reject her motion for a hand recount that she sued for on the basis that there
was 0 evidence of fraud or tampering with the vote.

Ol yes it was an exercise in voter suppression only state wide. had she gotten her way with a hand recount
none of the states would have been ready in time for yesterday.

WI barely made it by finishing on Monday.

This whole scam was to prevent those electoral from being counted. it had nothing to do with making sure votes counted.
 
Back
Top Bottom