• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

More than half of arrested anti-Trump protesters didn't vote in Oregon

Duplicate thread and 3 minutes older than the first one.
 
I didn't start it with Cardinal. I just started a thread.

Voting is not required to exercise rights.

Protesting does make anyone guilty of anything.

The fact that social media is an effective tool for organizing folks of a like mind means nothing.

You're just pissed because everyone is not kissing Trump's ass.
 
Interesting tidbit, two threads were started on the same topic within 20 minutes of each other. Hmmmm

Kool Aid effect?
 
Not very many could have, they lost the election.:doh
That does not mean they did not try, the best voter fraud, would be one that could not be detected.
 
That does not mean they did not try, the best voter fraud, would be one that could not be detected.

And the worst would be one that did not result in the desired outcome.
 
Looks like some folks already forgot about the organized and financed protests against Trump during the campaign.
But hold on ... that was then, this is now.
It's completely different.
Yeah, that's it.
These are truly grassroots protests.
uh-huh.
 
And the worst would be one that did not result in the desired outcome.
I think Hillary won Oregon, but then I think she was expected to.
No, if they were actually doing voter fraud, it would have been in the swing states, where the right few thousand
votes in the right county, could swing a state.
 
So if people go to another state to protest, it could only be because they were being paid. Wow.

Well the more important question is: why the **** are you protesting in someone else's state?

Assholes. Go home.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Well the more important question is: why the **** are you protesting in someone else's state?

Assholes. Go home.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Because that's where the closest protest to them was being organized.

I was taught in school that protest is a legitimate demonstration of the first amendment.
 
I think Hillary won Oregon, but then I think she was expected to.
No, if they were actually doing voter fraud, it would have been in the swing states, where the right few thousand
votes in the right county, could swing a state.

So I guess we can say that they did not do it or did not do enough of it because ...... They Lost.
 
More than half of arrested anti-Trump protesters didn't vote in Oregon | KGW.com

What the hell are they protesting for then? It gives me even more reason to believe that there are professional protestors getting paid to do this kind of thing.

I don't see how it's possible to connect those dots. It's possible of course the protesters were paid, but there isn't any evidence of that, and it's also possible some voted in another state, and others are simply typical irresponsible young people who didn't bother to register and/or vote in a state that went very comfortably for Hillary.
 
So I guess we can say that they did not do it or did not do enough of it because ...... They Lost.
I suspect real voter fraud is best kept to a minimum, only applying enough pressure to win.
The polls said Hillary was up by 4%, that she might even turn Texas Blue.
So they may have applied only enough pressure to ensure a victory based on that analysis,
but the analysis was wrong.
 
Well the more important question is: why the **** are you protesting in someone else's state?

Assholes. Go home.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

So what?

This is the United States, not 48 contiguous and separate countries.
 
I suspect real voter fraud is best kept to a minimum, only applying enough pressure to win.
The polls said Hillary was up by 4%, that she might even turn Texas Blue.
So they may have applied only enough pressure to ensure a victory based on that analysis,
but the analysis was wrong.

Nice Theory.
 
Looks like some folks already forgot about the organized and financed protests against Trump during the campaign.
But hold on ... that was then, this is now.
It's completely different.
Yeah, that's it.
These are truly grassroots protests.
uh-huh.

Of course a few paid protesters during a campaign doesn't mean that all future protests by liberals/democrats are funded by Soros. Both republicans and democrats use or have used paid trolls to go to websites like this one (probably bigger ones tbh) and push an agenda. That doesn't mean YOU are a troll, and if I assert you are I'll need more evidence that at some point GOP outfits pushed fake 'grassroots' organizing online, which is true.
 
The 1st Amendment doesn't say that you have to vote in a state before you can express your opinion there.

It also doesn't say that you can't be paid for expressing your opinion.

Deal with it.
And reality says that most people that dont live in the states where they are protesting in are simply, douchebags.

But dont worry. Hillary Clinton is going to TOTALLY kick ass in 2020.
 
Well the more important question is: why the **** are you protesting in someone else's state?

Assholes. Go home.

Why not? Not aware of protest etiquette that says, "Thou shalt only protest within one's own state borders."
 
Why not? Not aware of protest etiquette that says, "Thou shalt only protest within one's own state borders."

Not when your travel is paid and you are paid.
 
Back
Top Bottom