• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Clinton Camp Claims Next Wikileaks Will Be Fakes

Fenton said:
Hillary was compromised long before Assange started releasing Podestas Emails Which makes me question why on earth the DNC thought she was a good pick for the Democrat candidate.
Click to expand...

She represented the Democratic Party fairly well, despite being in a flawed package. But there's a few reasons why she won and a wild old socialist seemed to be the only competition for the nomination.

1) The Democratic Party has changed in the last two decades. There's no longer any true desire for centrists or conservative Democrats. Webb and Chafee would have been quite common but a decade ago. Now they're an extinct pair of groupings.

2) The DNC has only concentrated on getting the Senate and winning the White House. It has plainly neglected raising up talented politicians that are currently serving at state levels or are somehow low profile national politicians.

3) The Democratic Party was coming off of a two-term Presidency. It is somewhat normal for the competition to be lacking due to the normal turnover rate of 1-2 terms for parties in the White House. Not many are wanting to step forward only to face likely defeat in the fall.

4) Ideological fatigue or complacency. Also a regular feature from #3, which exacerbates 1 & 2. After having power for two terms, ideas stemming from the governing party become stale or at least are perceived that way by the American public. Change becomes the byword.
 
iguanaman said:
You mean in the afterlife? I could care less who they support once they are dead. Hillary has promise that she will destroy them...Trump thinks the Russians will and so will do nothing but encourage their followers with his racist rhetoric.
Click to expand...

Exactly what does a promise from Hillary mean? Not much. I believe Obama said the same thing, how is that going? He has prolonged the agony every way he could from rules of engagement to phony environmental issues.
 
coldjoint said:
Exactly what does a promise from Hillary mean? Not much. I believe Obama said the same thing, how is that going? He has prolonged the agony every way he could from rules of engagement to phony environmental issues.
Click to expand...

Iraq will be free of ISIS this year and next year they will be gone from Syria too. And it will be done without any large engagements by US troops too. Quite a feat when you see how many Americans died fighting in Iraq under Bush and it took over 6 YEARS!
 
iguanaman said:
Iraq will be free of ISIS this year and next year they will be gone from Syria too. And it will be done without any large engagements by US troops too. Quite a feat when you see how many Americans died fighting in Iraq under Bush and it took over 6 YEARS!
Click to expand...

Really? Now you are worried about Americans? Since when? Tell that to the people from Orlando.
 
iguanaman said:
Isis is getting its butt kicked by the Iraqi's and Obama as we speak. They have bigger worries that trying to influence our elections like Putin is. He is the only national leader in the world that likes Trump except for Kim Jung-il of course. Trump is popular in the axis of evil. Birds of a feather? When the character of a man is not clear to you, look at his friends. Japanese Proverb
Click to expand...

Obama had to be shamed into doing anything at all. He was willing to accept Iraq becoming a terrorist state. he only responded at all when a resulting humanitarian crisis threatened his legacy. Until then, they were only the JV team to Obama.
 
ObamacareFail said:
Obama had to be shamed into doing anything at all. He was willing to accept Iraq becoming a terrorist state. he only responded at all when a resulting humanitarian crisis threatened his legacy. Until then, they were only the JV team to Obama.
Click to expand...

Unlike other past Presidents, Obama talks loudly and keeps his little stick in his pocket.
 
iguanaman said:
Actually Hillary knows there are some really bad people out there that want Trump elected. It does not take a genius to see that they might try anything.
Click to expand...

the criminal class is pulling for Hillary. The people who think they are entitled to the wealth and property of others are Hillary supporters
 
jimbo said:
Of course they do, and yes they will.

AFAIK, neither Clinton or her campaign have labelled the leaks already out there as fakes, but the not yet released ones will be?
Click to expand...

Interesting point!
 
iguanaman said:
You mean in the afterlife? I could care less who they support once they are dead. Hillary has promise that she will destroy them...Trump thinks the Russians will and so will do nothing but encourage their followers with his racist rhetoric.
Click to expand...

You believe Hillary? Hillary will let them alone for 25 bucks a head, In speaking fees of course.
 
Fenton said:
A spokesperson for Hillary Clinton's campaign said Sunday that if Wikileaks were to publish a bombshell email in the final two days of the election, it would likely not be authentic.
“Friends, please remember that if you see a whopper of a Wikileaks in next two days - it’s probably a fake,” tweeted Jennifer Palmieri, the communications director for the Clinton campaign.


Clinton campaign: Ignore 'whopper' emails from WikiLeaks in last 2 days - Business Insider

:lamo

Yes, because they've got all the credibility in the world on their side...Wow. So Hillary KNOWS there's some really bad E-mails out there and she's expecting something especially damaging from Assange in the next couple of days ( so am I ).
Click to expand...

In order for a wikileak to be interesting at this point it would have to be faked. Wikileaks is reduced to releasing reports on procedural and retention policy. My thinking is that if they had something juicy they would have released it by now, rather than continuing to twitter unspeakably dull office paperwork stories.
 
Fenton said:
Yes, because they've got all the credibility in the world on their side...Wow. So Hillary KNOWS there's some really bad E-mails out there and she's expecting something especially damaging from Assange in the next couple of days ( so am I ).
Click to expand...

Isn't this exactly like the Trump campaign saying the election is rigged, in advance of an anticipated loss...?
 
mconlonx said:
Isn't this exactly like the Trump campaign saying the election is rigged, in advance of an anticipated loss...?
Click to expand...

Mo idea, maybe you should start your own thread about that
 
Fenton said:
A spokesperson for Hillary Clinton's campaign said Sunday that if Wikileaks were to publish a bombshell email in the final two days of the election, it would likely not be authentic.
“Friends, please remember that if you see a whopper of a Wikileaks in next two days - it’s probably a fake,” tweeted Jennifer Palmieri, the communications director for the Clinton campaign.


Clinton campaign: Ignore 'whopper' emails from WikiLeaks in last 2 days - Business Insider

:lamo

Yes, because they've got all the credibility in the world on their side...Wow. So Hillary KNOWS there's some really bad E-mails out there and she's expecting something especially damaging from Assange in the next couple of days ( so am I ).
Click to expand...

So has there been a bombshell? Or are they waiting for Wednesday?
 
Cardinal said:
In order for a wikileak to be interesting at this point it would have to be faked. Wikileaks is reduced to releasing reports on procedural and retention policy. My thinking is that if they had something juicy they would have released it by now, rather than continuing to twitter unspeakably dull office paperwork stories.
Click to expand...

Dull because the same corrupt techniques are used so commonly it becomes boring. Wikileaks has made it clear Clintons cheats, and that is a mild way to put it. Her dishonesty is so pronounced it is being ignored as if it didn't matter. Supporters will regret their own dishonesty if she is elected.
 
What rational purpose could an entity have for releasing damaging information at the last minute other than to reduce the timeframe in which it might be debunked - especially in an election where one group of supporters believes everything negative about their political enemy without reflection?
 
mconlonx said:
Isn't this exactly like the Trump campaign saying the election is rigged, in advance of an anticipated loss...?
Click to expand...

No, it's not. You see, there has been evidence and instances of rigging and fraud. There is no evidence that these WikiLeaks emails are bogus.
 
Fenton said:
A spokesperson for Hillary Clinton's campaign said Sunday that if Wikileaks were to publish a bombshell email in the final two days of the election, it would likely not be authentic.
“Friends, please remember that if you see a whopper of a Wikileaks in next two days - it’s probably a fake,” tweeted Jennifer Palmieri, the communications director for the Clinton campaign.


Clinton campaign: Ignore 'whopper' emails from WikiLeaks in last 2 days - Business Insider

:lamo

Yes, because they've got all the credibility in the world on their side...Wow. So Hillary KNOWS there's some really bad E-mails out there and she's expecting something especially damaging from Assange in the next couple of days ( so am I ).
Click to expand...

ROTFLOL...

How stupid... to draw attention to Wikileaks, and by default admitting those up to now were legit (which they are).

Well done Hillary. Two thumbs-up.
 
Greenbeard said:
Somebody probably should've told them that 40 million people have already voted.
Click to expand...

Addendum: somebody should probably tell them that today is Election Day.

Kind of running out of time for that bombshell they've been promising.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom