• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

American vigilante hacker sends Russia a warning

NonoBadDog said:
It looks like the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs might be as sloppy at cyber security as Clinton and company. And then maybe not. What would be nice to know is if he hacked any servers and down loaded them. That is a bigger coup than changing a web page.

What would be really interesting is how other hackers feel about this.
Click to expand...

Any Russian official found to be running an email server in their basement with classified documents would end up eating a polonium salad.
 
Tigerace117 said:
So it's okay when another country does it, but when we do it it's bad?

Are you that terrified of World War Three(something which isn't happening anytime soon) that your willing to roll over that quickly?
Click to expand...

Except that we don't have evidence that the Russian government is the source of the hacks.
 
 
Tigerace117 said:
Other than, you know,

US government: Russia behind hacking campaign to disrupt US elections | Ars Technica

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/08/us/politics/us-formally-accuses-russia-of-stealing-dnc-emails.html

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...0b9654-8cbf-11e6-875e-2c1bfe943b66_story.html

US sees more signs Russia feeding emails to WikiLeaks - CNNPolitics.com

https://www.theguardian.com/technol...ia-dnc-hack-interfering-presidential-election

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...y-clinton-blames-russia-putin-wikileaks-rele/
Click to expand...

I have seen this administration in action long enough to know that you can't trust the what any of them say, especially when there is political gain from their comments.

Posting multiple links based on the same proclamation doesn't give it any more credibility. Right now it is the word of the US government against the word of Wikileaks, and since the hack in question shows the Administration willing to lie about everything for political gain I am more willing to give the nod to Wikileaks.
 
Last edited:
jmotivator said:
I have seen this administration in action long enough to know that you can't trust the what any of them say, especially when there is political gain from their comments.

Posting multiple links based on the same proclamation doesn't give it any more credibility. Right now it is the word of the US government against the word of Wikileaks, and since the hack in question shows the Administration willing to lie about everything for political gain I am more willing to give the nod to Wikileaks.
Click to expand...

:roll:

So, because WikiLeaks says that the Administration is willing to lie--- the same administration that Assange is terrified of and hates deeply--- your willing to take their word for it.

Okay.
 
Tigerace117 said:
:roll:

So, because WikiLeaks says that the Administration is willing to lie--- the same administration that Assange is terrified of and hates deeply--- your willing to take their word for it.

Okay.
Click to expand...

Because the emails show an administration and a DNC willing to lie about anything if it helps them politically.
 
jmotivator said:
Because the emails show an administration and a DNC willing to lie about anything if it helps them politically.
Click to expand...

Unconfirmed emails obtained illegally. Stuff which would never stand up in court.
 
Tigerace117 said:
Unconfirmed emails obtained illegally. Stuff which would never stand up in court.
Click to expand...

LOL! You can't decide with narrative to borrow from the DNC. (hint: they don't work together!)

Also your "it'll never hold up in court!" is just perfect. Spoken like a true mafioso.
 
jmotivator said:
LOL! You can't decide with narrative to borrow from the DNC. (hint: they don't work together!)

Also your "it'll never hold up in court!" is just perfect. Spoken like a true mafioso.
Click to expand...

It's not only unconfirmed, and has been obtained illegally--- even if they were confirmed, there would be nothing y'all could do, because, you know, it's against the law.

Now do you understand?
 
danielpalos said:
The Only way to "impress the Russians" is with an Army Group, in reserve.
Click to expand...

Lol ! All options are on the table for the Left wing when it comes to making sure their corruption stays hidden.

Including military conflict with the Russians.
 
ajn678 said:
So you have a problem with someone doing it to us, but you encourage our private citizens to do it to other governments? Could it possibly be because you're mad that the candidate you support is having their dirty laundry leaked?
Click to expand...

Apparently Russia has engaged us in a virtual war. Apparently, we don't have a government that is willing to fight back so some lonely American is doing it for the government. I fail to see the problem with the lonely American, only with our government.
 
Fenton said:
Lol ! All options are on the table for the Left wing when it comes to making sure their corruption stays hidden.

Including military conflict with the Russians.
Click to expand...

A political gambit? We already know the fantastical right wing is not patriotic enough to advocate for wartime tax rates. So, why bother. We have the Best form of Socialism in the Entire World, after all.
 
I love statist hackers the best. :lamo

Really, that's a new one. I was not aware statist puppets were smart enough for this stuff.
 
ajn678 said:
Probably not a good idea to mess with a nation that kills people freely that they don't like.
Click to expand...

He's not messing with the US, he's messing with Russia.
 
Cisero said:
This guy must be really full of himself if he thinks he can address the Russian government as if he represents the US.
Click to expand...

Not to mention a sociopath and crazy person of the highest and most dangerous caliber.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom