• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

O'keefe Undercover Video Part II: Rigging Elections For the Last 50 Years..

Are you denying that editing can change the meaning of a interview? How do you know why he was fired? The only one with a problm is O'Keefee he is a convicted liar.

Convicted Criminal James O'Keefe Dupes Right Wing Media Again! | Crooks and Liars

Lol.... Edited video's led to all this ????

Top Democrat Forced To Resign After Being Caught Encouraging Violence!

Bob Kramer steps down.....

“Wherever Trump and Pence are gonna be we have events. And we have a whole team across the country that does that. Both consultants and people from the Democratic Party and the Democratic Party apparatus and people from the campaign, the Clinton campaign. And my role in the campaign is to manage all that,” Creamer told a PV writer. Foval described Creamer as “diabolical,” which is one of the reason why he likes him.


And Scott Foval gets fired.....

"Americans United for Change has always operated according to the highest ethical standards," said Brad Woodhouse, President of Americans United For Change. "Scott Foval is no longer associated with Americans United for Change."
 
Lol.... Edited video's led to all this ????

Top Democrat Forced To Resign After Being Caught Encouraging Violence!

Bob Kramer steps down.....

“Wherever Trump and Pence are gonna be we have events. And we have a whole team across the country that does that. Both consultants and people from the Democratic Party and the Democratic Party apparatus and people from the campaign, the Clinton campaign. And my role in the campaign is to manage all that,” Creamer told a PV writer. Foval described Creamer as “diabolical,” which is one of the reason why he likes him.


And Scott Foval gets fired.....

"Americans United for Change has always operated according to the highest ethical standards," said Brad Woodhouse, President of Americans United For Change. "Scott Foval is no longer associated with Americans United for Change."

Actually Foval did sound like a jerk. I would guess that was why he got fired and good riddance. I would not be surprised if he gets rehired by the other side in the future though. It is not like he broke any laws by talking.
 
My opinion is just as important as everybody else.

Stop crying because you don't agree.

Nothing stopping you from starting your own " I Hate Trump " thread and apparently nothing stopping you from embarrassing yourself repeatedly by spamming this thread. Your spam is a lazy and childish attempt to pull focus away from the substance of the discussion.

It's like someone left their DP account open on a Library computer and you wondered away from your parents to post nonsense on someone's account
 
Last edited:
Actually Foval did sound like a jerk. I would guess that was why he got fired and good riddance. I would not be surprised if he gets rehired by the other side in the future though.

No Foval sounds like a typical Democrat operative, or Politician or Progressive supporters and would still be there organizing violent clashes by paying mentally ill homeless people to assault Trump supporters if not for this video.

Oh, and Foval wasn't the only person that has had to account for this latest example of tin pot banana republic style tactics brought to you by the Democratic party....

Robert Creamer -


Dem operative 'stepping back' after video suggests group incited violence at Trump rallies - CNNPolitics.com

What a bunch of bottom feeding scum of the earth low lifes.....
 
No Foval sounds like a typical Democrat operative, or Politician or Progressive supporters and would still be there organizing violent clashes by paying mentally ill homeless people to assault Trump supporters if not for this video.

Oh, and Foval wasn't the only person that has had to account for this latest example of tin pot banana republic style tactics brought to you by the Democratic party....

Robert Creamer -


Dem operative 'stepping back' after video suggests group incited violence at Trump rallies - CNNPolitics.com

What a bunch of bottom feeding scum of the earth low lifes.....

You are now lying, there is no evidence whatsoever that homeless people were ever paid to assault people Trump rallies.
 
Nothing stopping you from starting your own " I Hate Trump " thread and apparently nothing stopping you from embarrassing yourself repeatedly by spamming this thread. Your spam is a lazy and childish attempt to pull focus away from the substance of the discussion.

It's like someone left their DP account open on a Library computer and you wondered away from your parents to post nonsense on someone's account

Your boy O Keef is purely a piece of ****.

You sticking up for him shows your character.
 
Last edited:
ONE MORE TIME, if O'keefe had altered and edited the video to the extent you people claim, there would be no reason to fire anyone or any reason for anyone else to resign.

You people are in desperation mode and still using worn out talking points to defend the indefensible.

Face it, the Hillary camapign and the DNC is being exposed as corrupt beyond measure.

Optics have always been enough to make or break careers in politics regardless of the veracity of the underlying allegations. Thats the nature of the beast. Now if you want us to believe that those allegations are factually true - it's put up or shut up time for you. Where's the unedited footage?
 
Optics have always been enough to make or break careers in politics regardless of the veracity of the underlying allegations. Thats the nature of the beast. Now if you want us to believe that those allegations are factually true - it's put up or shut up time for you. Where's the unedited footage?

Optics....:roll:

Scott Foval.....

“It’s a very easy thing for Republicans to say, “Well, they’re bussing people in.” Well, you know what? We’ve been bussing people in to deal with you ****ing assholes for fifty years and we’re not going to stop now, we’re just going to find a different way to do it."

“When I do this I think as an investigator first – I used to do the investigations. I think backwards from how they would prosecute, if they could, and then try to build out the method to avoid that.”
 
The New Dem's are in it to facilitate profits over lives. As long as they get their cut, they don't care about jobs, wages, wars, or healthcare beyond lip service.

There is no significant party today that represents the working class and poor. We need a Labor Party.

Neoliberal, what we call them, is a fancy word for the Neoconservative-Friendly Right-Wing Faction of the Democratic Party. I.E. - Hillary Clinton.
 
Your boy O Keef is purely a piece of ****.

You sticking up for him shows your character.

Awwe, whats wrong ? Did O'keefe ruin your day by exposing just how corrupt the Democratic party is ?

Its not his fault Scott Foval and Bob Kramer are bottom feeding pond scum.
 
My opinion is just as important as everybody else.

Stop crying because you don't agree.

Optics....:roll:

Scott Foval.....

“It’s a very easy thing for Republicans to say, “Well, they’re bussing people in.” Well, you know what? We’ve been bussing people in to deal with you ****ing assholes for fifty years and we’re not going to stop now, we’re just going to find a different way to do it."

“When I do this I think as an investigator first – I used to do the investigations. I think backwards from how they would prosecute, if they could, and then try to build out the method to avoid that.”

You've chosen the path of shut up. So noted.
 
You've chosen the path of shut up. So noted.

Lol !!

Huh ? No I've chosen the path thats based on the truth and the best you people have to offer in response is ad hominem attacks and weak attempts at diversion
 
You are now lying, there is no evidence whatsoever that homeless people were ever paid to assault people Trump rallies.

Wait a minute.

-Trump says in a video "you can grab their *****" and Clinton sheep say 'he's guilty of sexual assault'.

-Clinton operative states in video he's using the CIA playbook to overthrow a gov't and the yobs suddenly want DNA evidence from a paid homeless political agitator.

LOL
 
Awwe, whats wrong ? Did O'keefe ruin your day by exposing just how corrupt the Democratic party is ?

Its not his fault Scott Foval and Bob Kramer are bottom feeding pond scum.

Exactly as I stated.

The emperor had no clothes.
 
Wait a minute.

-Trump says in a video "you can grab their *****" and Clinton sheep say 'he's guilty of sexual assault'.

That didn't actually happen. People started saying he was guilty of sexual assault when women started coming out of the woodwork accusing him of doing exactly what he bragged about doing. Until then the outrage was over his words, not over claims he actually sexually assaulted anyone. We now have multiple witnesses besides just the victims who corroborate some of the claims.
 
That didn't actually happen. People started saying he was guilty of sexual assault when women started coming out of the woodwork accusing him of doing exactly what he bragged about doing. Until then the outrage was over his words, not over claims he actually sexually assaulted anyone. We now have multiple witnesses besides just the victims who corroborate some of the claims.

Bull. The second that story broke people were screaming, "he's bragging about women he's sexually assaulted" while others said, "no, it's locker room talk" before the first woman came forward.

Just like the MSM cries of, "Oh noes! Trump is inciting violence like nazi little-hands Mussolini" . next thing you know, the MSM just happens to have cameras on every punch thrown.

This whole thing's been orchestrated.
 
Bull. The second that story broke people were screaming, "he's bragging about women he's sexually assaulted" while others said, "no, it's locker room talk" before the first woman came forward.

No, people said he's bragging about sexually assaulting women. Which he was. No one was claiming he actually did it. They were claiming, correctly, that he was bragging that he did. Thus why Anderson Cooper's question was meant to clarify whether this was just bragging or not.
 
ONE MORE TIME, if O'keefe had altered and edited the video to the extent you people claim, there would be no reason to fire anyone or any reason for anyone else to resign.

You people are in desperation mode and still using worn out talking points to defend the indefensible.

Face it, the Hillary camapign and the DNC is being exposed as corrupt beyond measure.

Fenton,

Stop acting as if this happens only within the DNC. The RNC isn't innocent either. They have a long history of political underhandedness and corruption, too, as this linked article makes clear.

The Corruption of the Republican Consultant Continues at the RNC | The Resurgent

In fact, the Republican Speaker of the House in the Alabama Legislature was recently indicted on corruption charges.

https://newrepublic.com/article/133660/corrupt-gop-running-alabama-ground

Now, granted these examples don't get to the level of underhandedness and corruption as the Koval situation does, but let's not pretend as if this only happens with the Democrat Party. It happens on both sides. The only thing that makes this look bad for the DNC and possibly Hillary, too, is that Koval was caught on video acknowledging his role in sanctioning and/or taking part in "the dark side of politics". Whether Hillary's campaign or even Obama himself knew anything about what this guy was doing is questionable, but as I said in another thread on this matter it would be difficult to believe neither of them where uninformed as to what was going on. But as I also said there's a difference between talking strategy and talking tactics. For example:

If a political consultant told me his team intended to use robo-calls to prospect for potential supporters/voters, I wouldn't have a problem with that. But IF that robo-call included as message that demeaned my political opponent and I had no fore-knowledge of the content of that voice message, how exactly am I to blame for the call?

I'm in no way saying I agree with what's been disclosed, but to act as if this is a one-sided issue is just plain foolish. Both sides have their "dark side" political operatives who work real hard to keep their distance from the primary candidate. Koval took the hit and fell on his sword because he had to. He became both an embarrasment and a HUGE liability for the DNC. But you can be sure that if this video had never come to light, he'd still be "solemnly swearing he's up to no good" with a big fat grin on his face as he tells you "Scout's Honor" same as every other dark-politics operative.

Sidenote: Koval kinda reminds me of Control, the character who play's Oliva Pope's father in the ABC TV series, "Scandal". Somebody's got to do the dirty work. :shrug:
 
Last edited:
Fenton,

Stop acting as if this happens only within the DNC. The RNC isn't innocent either. They have a long history of political underhandedness and corruption, too, as this linked article makes clear.

The Corruption of the Republican Consultant Continues at the RNC | The Resurgent

In fact, the Republican Speaker of the House in the Alabama Legislature was recently indicted on corruption charges.

https://newrepublic.com/article/133660/corrupt-gop-running-alabama-ground

Now, granted these examples don't get to the level of underhandedness and corruption as the Koval situation does, but let's not pretend as if this only happens with the Democrat Party. It happens on both sides. The only thing that makes this look bad for the DNC and possibly Hillary, too, is that Koval was caught on video acknowledging his role in sanctioning and/or taking part in "the dark side of politics". Whether Hillary's campaign or even Obama himself knew anything about what this guy was doing is questionable, but as I said in another thread on this matter it would be difficult to believe neither of them where uninformed as to what was going on. But as I also said there's a difference between talking strategy and talking tactics. For example:

If a political consultant told me his team intended to use robo-calls to prospect for potential supporters/voters, I wouldn't have a problem with that. But IF that robo-call included as message that demeaned my political opponent and I had no fore-knowledge of the content of that voice message, how exactly am I to blame for the call?

I'm in no way saying I agree with what's been disclosed, but to act as if this is a one-sided issue is just plain foolish. Both sides have their "dark side" political operatives who work real hard to keep their distance from the primary candidate. Koval took the hit and fell on his sword because he had to. He became both an embarrasment and a HUGE liability for the DNC. But you can be sure that if this video had never come to light, he'd still be "solemnly swearing he's up to no good" with a big fat grin on his face as he tells you "Scout's Honor" same as every other dark-politics operative.

Sidenote: Koval kinda reminds me of Control, the character who play's Oliva Pope's father in the ABC TV series, "Scandal". Somebody's got to do the dirty work. :shrug:

Huh ??

If you have some evidence that shows the RNC participating in something comparable to what the video reveals then post it.

Other wise your'e just trying to divert attention away from the Op and justify what Foval did by drawing false equivalencies.
 
Huh ??

If you have some evidence that shows the RNC participating in something comparable to what the video reveals then post it.

Other wise your'e just trying to divert attention away from the Op and justify what Foval did by drawing false equivalencies.

Not at all. I specifically said:

...these examples don't get to the level of underhandedness and corruption as the Koval situation does...

So, there's no diversion here. I'm just saying both sides do it.

The only reason this situation is garnering so much attention is:

1) Trump has made such a big stink over rigging the election throughout this campaign season that people have equated "dirty tricks" (i.e., paid protesters) to tampering with voting machines or fixing an election (i.e., stuffing the ballot box).

2) Koval was stupid enough to tell all to someone he trusted and foolish enough to be recorded saying it on video.

I'm not downplaying what has happened nor am I trying to be cynical about it. I'm just saying both sides employ very similar "dirty tricks". The reason this has become such a big deal is because for perhaps the first time in campaign history we have an operative for either party on audio and video telling exactly what he does, the fact that he likes what he does - he enjoys getting down in the weeds - and detailing how "gutter politics" really works behind the scenes.

It's disturbing no doubt and he deserved to be fired, but if the worse "corruption" that can be un-earth here is he paid mentally challenged people to be plants at Trump rallies whose sole purpose was to stir up the angst of his supporters so that they would retaliate and get caught on camera by the mainstream media, then all you have is an embarrassing situation here and no "corruption" or "rigged" election.

Again, both sides do crap like this! But here's the rub...

You can't control someone's actions. So, if I support a certain politician and some protesters stands near me and starts mouthing off, it's on me if I take the bait and haul off and punch the guy in the face! Here's the thing though...I don't have to take the bait. But that's what Ms. Koval wanted from Trump supporters at his rallies - a reaction that was so over the top it validated the racist, bigoted hatred many people believe is prevalent among Trump supporters.

My suggestion to his supporters: DON'T TAKE THE BAIT. :shrug:
 
Last edited:
No, just a problem with people who play Edward Scissorhands with their film and frankenstein random pieces together. If it wasn't hypothetical then there should be no problem showing us complete footage of the entire conversation from start to finish, right? So where is it?

How many people would watch 45 hours of this stuff? I would think there is a lot of walking around and dead air besides off topic conversation.
would we be served by the full version? I would like a link to the full version annotated with the parts that are used.
 
Leftists are in full denial. They want to try to make it be about O Keefe instead of the content and the video taped evidence of two now fired leftists that show themselves for who and what they are. The revelations that these vermin have spent literally 100s of visits to the WH to meet with the head rat...well....

nothing see here folks...nothing to see. Just move along.
 
Back
Top Bottom