• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

New Okeefe Sting Exposes Democrats Attempt to Incite Violence

Attacking the source........predictable

think much?

"A recent series of sting videos against Planned Parenthood, created by a group called the Center for Medical Progress, involved deceptions so devious—including an attempt by undercover operatives to buy fetal tissue—that the campaign backfired. Pro-choice activists united in anger at the sting’s perpetrators, and a Texas grand jury cleared Planned Parenthood of wrongdoing and indicted the C.M.P. In Presidential politics, gaffes may be less damaging. As Brock notes, “In the year of Trump, people are more inured to the outrageous.”

O’Keefe promises that his covert documentary of the Hillary Clinton campaign will command attention. But on May 19th he publicly conceded defeat in the Open Society Foundations investigation. In an interview posted on Breitbart News, he confessed that he had “been forced to abandon an ambitious undercover investigation into billionaire left-wing financier George Soros.” O’Keefe acknowledged that he “forgot to hang up” the phone, but declined to be more specific about the operation, saying, “I don’t like to reveal the tactics of what we do.” He apologized to his supporters and promised that his many other investigations had not been compromised. “Unfortunately, I’m burned on this particular investigation,” he said, adding that he was “very disappointed,” because he believes that the influence of billionaires such as Soros is “the most important topic undermining democracy.” But he concluded, “If I wanted to be perfect, I would give up.” ♦"
 
Dirty little secrets
Dirty little lies
We got our dirty little fingers in everybody's pie
We love to cut you down to size
We love dirty laundry
We can do "The Innuendo"
We can dance and sing
When it's said and done we haven't told you a thing
We all know that Crap is King
Give us dirty laundry!

One of my all-time favorite songs! :thumbs:
 
O'keefe is basically just a masturbation aide for right wing social justice warriors these days. Aside from causing trouble now and again he's just a twat.
 
How many times does this guy have to get caught deceptively editing videos before you people just start ignoring him
 
Last edited:
How many times does this guy have to get caught deceptively editing videos before you people just start ignoringhim

Now now, this is a kinder, better post-fact-check society.
 
Okay, break down the edits for us in this case. And.....Go!

Why? Every single other video the guy has put out has turned out to be a lie, but you still think he's credible. Why should I expect you'll change your mind this time?
 
Why? Every single other video the guy has put out has turned out to be a lie, but you still think he's credible. Why should I expect you'll change your mind this time?



This one is a lie ?? Can you be specific ?
 
think much?

"A recent series of sting videos against Planned Parenthood, created by a group called the Center for Medical Progress, involved deceptions so devious—including an attempt by undercover operatives to buy fetal tissue—that the campaign backfired. Pro-choice activists united in anger at the sting’s perpetrators, and a Texas grand jury cleared Planned Parenthood of wrongdoing and indicted the C.M.P. In Presidential politics, gaffes may be less damaging. As Brock notes, “In the year of Trump, people are more inured to the outrageous.”

O’Keefe promises that his covert documentary of the Hillary Clinton campaign will command attention. But on May 19th he publicly conceded defeat in the Open Society Foundations investigation. In an interview posted on Breitbart News, he confessed that he had “been forced to abandon an ambitious undercover investigation into billionaire left-wing financier George Soros.” O’Keefe acknowledged that he “forgot to hang up” the phone, but declined to be more specific about the operation, saying, “I don’t like to reveal the tactics of what we do.” He apologized to his supporters and promised that his many other investigations had not been compromised. “Unfortunately, I’m burned on this particular investigation,” he said, adding that he was “very disappointed,” because he believes that the influence of billionaires such as Soros is “the most important topic undermining democracy.” But he concluded, “If I wanted to be perfect, I would give up.” ♦"


Unrelated drivel....Do you have any comment on this latest undercover video ??
 
James O’Keefe Stings Himself

March 16th, a man who said his name was Victor left a voice message at the offices of the Open Society Foundations, which are funded by George Soros, saying that he was a potential donor. Then, he forgot to hang up the phone, and the machine recorded “Victor” and his staff describing what sounded like an entrapment scheme. This week, James O’Keefe, the conservative activist who has used undercover videos to try to embarrass Planned Parenthood, NPR, and ACORN, admitted that he was the caller and apologized to his supporters for the failed operation. On “The New Yorker Radio Hour,” the staff writer Jane Mayer goes through the voice-mail recording to see what it tells us about O’Keefe’s methods and the scope of his ambitions.


James O’Keefe Stings Himself - The New Yorker
Ok care to tell us what if anything was inaccurate about his expose?

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
 
Why? Every single other video the guy has put out has turned out to be a lie, but you still think he's credible. Why should I expect you'll change your mind this time?

In other words, you can't refute it. Got it.
 
O Keefe, understands his audience very well.

"There's a sucker born every minute" is his motivation.
 
In other words, you can't refute it. Got it.

If Michael Moore came out with a video proclaiming racism on part of Donald Trump, how much time would you spend refuting it?
 
If Michael Moore came out with a video proclaiming racism on part of Donald Trump, how much time would you spend refuting it?

Straw herring.
 
O Keefe, understands his audience very well.

"There's a sucker born every minute" is his motivation.

So you refute the people on video, in their own voices? How?
 
Care to comment on the thread topic? Lol. The "look a squirrel" tactic ain't gonna work this time. ;)

I thought it worked just fine. It gave good insight into how O'Keefe operates....and he's the subject of the thread, isn't he? It was also pure joy just to listen to him sting himself. lol
 
I do get a sense that a lot of people here are deflecting to O'Keefe because they don't want to discuss what the people in the videos said entirely freely and of their own volitions.
 
Gotta love leftists. They see the people on the videos and shriek Okeefe!!! He must have replaced all their words!!!

 
Lawdy...that article reeeeeked of dog whistle words. lol.

Soo..is the term "bird -dogging" as in "follow a candidate to ask him questions" suddenly a big 'no-no' in conservative la la land, now?

"....Wikileaks reveals that at least one “bird-dogging” operation was approved directly by Robby Mook, Hillary Clinton’s campaign manager. In an email dated July 4, 2015, Mook approved a plan “to bird dog” Donald Trump, meaning specifically to infiltrate volunteers into his campaign events and ask him questions about immigration...."​

Are we supposed to be shocked that a political campaign has strategists who make plans to win elections? I think I'm more shocked that Trump didn't have one until Kelly Connway. If he runs the government anything like he runs his campaign....we're all in deep doo doo.
 
I do get a sense that a lot of people here are deflecting to O'Keefe because they don't want to discuss what the people in the videos said entirely freely and of their own volitions.

A lot of people?

Not one leftist who's posted on this thread has commented on the contents of the video, and EVERY single one has instead attacked O'Keefe.

It's quintessential liberalism on display.

edit: Finally, one did.
 
Lawdy...that article reeeeeked of dog whistle words. lol.

Soo..is the term "bird -dogging" as in "follow a candidate to ask him questions" suddenly a big 'no-no' in conservative la la land, now?

"....Wikileaks reveals that at least one “bird-dogging” operation was approved directly by Robby Mook, Hillary Clinton’s campaign manager. In an email dated July 4, 2015, Mook approved a plan “to bird dog” Donald Trump, meaning specifically to infiltrate volunteers into his campaign events and ask him questions about immigration...."​

Are we supposed to be shocked that a political campaign has strategists who make plans to win elections? I think I'm more shocked that Trump didn't have one until Kelly Connway. If he runs the government anything like he runs his campaign....we're all in deep doo doo.

The video exhibits illegal coordinating activity.

Clinton is running her campaign much the same way Hitler ran his rise to power.
 
Back
Top Bottom