Trump: ISIS Will ‘Take Over This Country’ If Hillary Clinton Wins

Simpleχity;1066431258 said:

You're the one with the suicide-cat avatar :shrug:

Click to expand...

So? That does not change one fact about Islam.

coldjoint said:

I can say the Koran is poorly written because it is. The second bolded defeats your apology because to live like Mohammad means you terrorize, you murder, you rape, and you molest children. Truly a wonderful example, And your 10 million Muslims, the majority of those were killed by other Muslims.

Click to expand...

And I can say you’re ugly because you are. But I can't show any evidence of that accusation. And the only evidence you can show of “Mohammad means you terrorize, you murder, you rape, and you molest children” is easily refuted. Pick your two or three best examples and post them. I challenge you.

Keep up with the thread. The previously established context was that the Muslims were killing Muslims, not Christians and others.

bluesmoke said:

And I can say you’re ugly because you are. But I can't show any evidence of that accusation. And the only evidence you can show of “Mohammad means you terrorize, you murder, you rape, and you molest children” is easily refuted. Pick your two or three best examples and post them. I challenge you.

Keep up with the thread. The previously established context was that the Muslims were killing Muslims, not Christians and others.

Click to expand...

What else did he do of any note but those things? His account in the Hadith bears all of that out. You are trying to defend the truly indefensible.

coldjoint said:

What else did he do of any note but those things? His account in the Hadith bears all of that out. You are trying to defend the truly indefensible.

Click to expand...

Now you’re trying to distract from your original claim with “What else did he do…”. You’re straying off your own point.

You are ignoring what I have already established, being the first three examples of what you referenced were taken out of context. I put the verses in context and refuted the nature of violence you attempted to prove.

You show your ignorance of the Hadith by saying “His account”. The Hadith is not Muhammad’s account. It is the account by others of Muhammad’s life writ down over a period of centuries after his death. And that account will not "bear(s) all that out." because I will, as I have already, easily refute whatever you attempt to prove with whatever little and poorly presented evidence you have.

I am not defending the indefensible. You are attacking without substantive proof of what you claim. Then, when challenged, you back down. I met your challenge (defended) and won. You won’t even meet my challenge to give me your best shot.

bluesmoke said:

Now you’re trying to distract from your original claim with “What else did he do…”. You’re straying off your own point.

You are ignoring what I have already established, being the first three examples of what you referenced were taken out of context. I put the verses in context and refuted the nature of violence you attempted to prove.

You show your ignorance of the Hadith by saying “His account”. The Hadith is not Muhammad’s account. It is the account by others of Muhammad’s life writ down over a period of centuries after his death. And that account will not "bear(s) all that out." because I will, as I have already, easily refute whatever you attempt to prove with whatever little and poorly presented evidence you have.

I am not defending the indefensible. You are attacking without substantive proof of what you claim. Then, when challenged, you back down. I met your challenge (defended) and won. You won’t even meet my challenge to give me your best shot.

Click to expand...

coldjoint said:

View attachment 67208746

Click to expand...

You are being idiotic. The evidence you are providing is not proof that the verses of the Quran or the Hadith are of the violent intent implied by your claim. You aren't being directly responsive to my post. Also, the "evidence" you submit is just a number from an online rag that provides no source to substantiate the figure given. The following reference gives worldwide Islamist terrorist attacks going back to the 1980's where even the number of those killed are less then what you show are the number of attacks:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Islamist_terrorist_attacks

You make claims you cannot prove. Then, when you cannot back up your own words, you just throw out another unfounded claim, which you've no support for and I refute without bothering to ask you to substantiate your figure, because I know you can't do it. You are not a worthy debater.

What's sad is the parallel evolution of Methodism with Wahabbism (Nejd Plateau, Saudi Arabia) and the fact that Obama winning 99% of the votes in Cuyahoga County, Ohio meant that they were either duped or deliberately voted for the first Arab president of the United States. What most American prisoners are failing to grasp is that Europe is way ahead of them: today, the gaze is forensic. Yes, Kitten, DNA matters. In America, you get free money for proving DNA ratios. Obama-Clinton ISIS studies will include their histories, the histories of church-and-state copulations. Syrian Christian migration to the United States began in 1820. Any question thus far about processing your mother tongue? In the U.S., you get college degrees for proving the processing of your mother tongue, even without Masonic Boy Scout assistance.