• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

WikiLeaks Releases Hillary's Paid Speech Transcripts .

Judging from the reactions of a lot of people before, during and after literally everything Hilary Clinton has ever said, it'd be hard to come to a conclusion otherwise.

The idea that this is somehow magically going to vault Trump to victory is laughable, and that's the only reason y'all brought it up, so.....


I never said it would vault anyone to victory, Trumps a horrible candidate too.
 
I got an AP update on my phone, when I woke up not long ago.
It said Russia behind hacks.

They're shilling extra hard to cover up the contents.

I don't believe anything that comes out of RT. So why should I believe anything that comes out of AP?
 

Anything wiki releases on her is going to be a dud to people like you. What, you agree with her two policy strategy ? One for the voters and one for the richest 1 % ?
 
There is an interesting one, where it looks like they're coordinating with David Brock.
I think that's illegal, although it may not be.

I'm not a lawyer nor an expert on campaign laws.
 
Are you in the habit of trusting the authticity of illegally hacked documents from Russia?

To my knowledge, Wikileaks has never published false information.
The reason they often take so long to publish it, is because they verify the authenticity of the data they receive.
 
Are you in the habit of trusting the authticity of illegally hacked documents from Russia?

That desperate ploy might have a chance if Hillary had not earned millions from speeches to Wall Street Financial firms.

What, you thought they were paying her 220k a pop to hear her talk about yoga and Chelsea's wedding ?
 
To my knowledge, Wikileaks has never published false information.
The reason they often take so long to publish it, is because they verify the authenticity of the data they receive.

To your knowledge?
 
That desperate ploy might have a chance if Hillary had not earned millions from speeches to Wall Street Financial firms.

What, you thought they were paying her 220k a pop to hear her talk about yoga and Chelsea's wedding ?

Free market. Gotta love it.
 
Free market. Gotta love it.

Lying Politicians with two seperate agendas, a BS agenda to appease naive American voters, and a real agenda to enrich the 1%.

Nothing to love about that.
 
She is about to be the President of the United States.

You mean after running against two losers that had no chance and then Trump that went out of his way to lose? That's impressive to you?
 
Do you have any information to the contrary?
I'm always willing to listen.

I just don't tolerate accusations like that without proof.
Plausibility doesn't equate to reality.

I am sorry, but you are the one wanting everyone to treat these documents as infallible and unaltered based on the credibility of an organization that is acting unlawfully and that is being supplied by a rival nation. You truly think I have the burden of proof?
 
I am sorry, but you are the one wanting everyone to treat these documents as infallible and unaltered based on the credibility of an organization that is acting unlawfully and that is being supplied by a rival nation. You truly think I have the burden of proof?

You do have that burden.
If they're inauthentic, then you must have proof, otherwise you're engaging in speculation and/or conspiracy theory.
 
Lying Politicians with two seperate agendas, a BS agenda to appease naive American voters, and a real agenda to enrich the 1%.

Nothing to love about that.

Doesn't bother you when Trump does it. I bet you voted for Romney. Self righteous indignation is not a good color on you.
 
Back
Top Bottom