• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Asking How To Destroy Evidence!

Thoreau72 said:
I suppose that depends upon whether or not one wants to equate "criminal" with "crazy". We are all a little bit crazy from time to time, and maybe we're all a little bit criminal from time to time, but Godzillary has a well established pattern of criminality.
Click to expand...

I guess that's why she's been charged with so many crimes.
 
The Mark said:
So far as I am aware, she has a well-established pattern of shady behavior, and has been accused of criminal behavior in the past.

And not once has it managed to result in a conviction.

I think that means she isn't a criminal, but I'm not sure on the precise definition.


I'm not saying she's a good option, but it's a better option than Trump appears to be. IMO.
Click to expand...

I do understand your position, however desperate it is, the lesser of the 2 evils position. I have several friends and family who find themselves in the same crazy position.

That said, she and her husband are both unconvicted felons. Committing a crime makes one a criminal. Whether or not such a person is convicted by the system, a person who committs a crime is by definition a criminal. Many people have literally "gotten away with murder", but such a person is still a murderer.
 
Deuce said:
I guess that's why she's been charged with so many crimes.
Click to expand...

That she has not been charged with any crimes at all speaks volumes about how corrupt our system is.

That James Comey sent Martha Stewart to prison for what she did provides more evidence of the hypocrisy and corruption present in our lawless government.
 
Thoreau72 said:
That she has not been charged with any crimes at all speaks volumes about how corrupt our system is.

That James Comey sent Martha Stewart to prison for what she did provides more evidence of the hypocrisy and corruption present in our lawless government.
Click to expand...

Bill Clinton couldn't get away with lying about getting his dick sucked. And you think they just skate by on everything else? That's not very likely.
 
Thoreau72 said:
That she has not been charged with any crimes at all speaks volumes about how corrupt our system is.

That James Comey sent Martha Stewart to prison for what she did provides more evidence of the hypocrisy and corruption present in our lawless government.
Click to expand...

Absence of evidence is evidence of guilt!

-Libertarians, 2016
 
roughdraft274 said:
Bill Clinton couldn't get away with lying about getting his dick sucked. And you think they just skate by on everything else? That's not very likely.
Click to expand...
Is that REALLY what you think Bill Clinton was on trial for?
 
Deuce said:
No, he was on trial for being a Democrat.
Click to expand...
Really? Are you sure he wasnt on trial for sexually harassing Paula Jones? Are you sure the lie under oath didnt come about because he lied during a sworn deposition?

See...thats the part about people like you that is equally laughable and disgusting. You will over look the facts in order to defend your party. Even at the expense of victims.
 
DVSentinel said:
The only way to really destroy data from a hard-drive is to destroy the hard-drive itself.
Click to expand...

Taxpayers have a lot of money for the 4th generation welfare toads . :shock:
 
Its really rather comical. National 'polls' right now have Hillary as a slight favorite. Polls.

Meanwhile...Hillary has outspent Trump 275 million to 87. Hillary has damn near every media market shilling for her 24/7. Hollywood is touting her. Obama is stumping for her. She has outspent Trump 75 million to ZERO in swing states...and is losing ground.

"Why aren’t I 50 points ahead?"
https://www.washingtonpost.com/vide...142b3e-8072-11e6-9578-558cc125c7ba_video.html

well...because...

 
roughdraft274 said:
Bill Clinton couldn't get away with lying about getting his dick sucked. And you think they just skate by on everything else? That's not very likely.
Click to expand...

Unless you can show that Bill was convicted of lying about that, it seems he very much DID get away with it. :mrgreen:
 
Deuce said:
Absence of evidence is evidence of guilt!

-Libertarians, 2016
Click to expand...

No, absence of indictment is circumstantial evidence of special treatment, IN THIS CASE.
 
Thoreau72 said:
I do understand your position, however desperate it is, the lesser of the 2 evils position. I have several friends and family who find themselves in the same crazy position.

That said, she and her husband are both unconvicted felons. Committing a crime makes one a criminal. Whether or not such a person is convicted by the system, a person who committs a crime is by definition a criminal. Many people have literally "gotten away with murder", but such a person is still a murderer.
Click to expand...
Well, I'm probably going to end up voting for a 3rd party candidate.

Not Johnson though, he supports TPP, as I understand it. Plus I disagree with him in other areas.
 
VanceMack said:
Really? Are you sure he wasnt on trial for sexually harassing Paula Jones? Are you sure the lie under oath didnt come about because he lied during a sworn deposition?

See...thats the part about people like you that is equally laughable and disgusting. You will over look the facts in order to defend your party. Even at the expense of victims.
Click to expand...

Yes my post was entirely literal, the charge was "being a Democrat."
 
Deuce said:
Yes my post was entirely literal, the charge was "being a Democrat."
Click to expand...
Which makes you either deliberately uninformed or a liar.
 
The Mark said:
Well, I'm probably going to end up voting for a 3rd party candidate.

Not Johnson though, he supports TPP, as I understand it. Plus I disagree with him in other areas.
Click to expand...

That is pretty much where I'm at too, for the same reason, TPP

I'm considering imitating Colin Kapernick. I will be sitting out the electoral fraud, or offer a protest for Jill Stein. Her running mate is quite controversial, and I like that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom