• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Asking How To Destroy Evidence!

X Factor said:
First Benghazi was no big deal and now the email thing is just for "fanatics". I'd think you'd have to be a Hillary fanatic to want to turn blind eye to all her honesty issues.
Click to expand...

The congressional committee, the FBI and 18 months of constant investigation have turned up no crime. Stop with the conspiracy theory and accept reality. Claiming that the FBI is in cahoots with Clinton to protect her is bat-**** crazy.
 
This cant be about Hillary's email server. After all...She stated all she did was sent email to her loving husband and a few recipes to Chelsea.

 


Apparently since it was Bills server it was REALLY under utilized...
 
Karma kind of dictates that Hillary lose this election because of all of her shenanigans... but that would also mean that karma played a role in electing Donald Trump POTUS.

Karma really is a bitch.
 
Jack Fabulous said:
Karma kind of dictates that Hillary lose this election because of all of her shenanigans... but that would also mean that karma played a role in electing Donald Trump POTUS.

Karma really is a bitch.
Click to expand...

Well, we really don't know if this is the "smoking gun" but it does have potential to sink her IT guy.
Some schlub going to jail for powerful people is a worse outcome.
 
Harry Guerrilla said:
Well, we really don't know if this is the "smoking gun" but it does have potential to sink her IT guy.
Some schlub going to jail for powerful people is a worse outcome.
Click to expand...

But most likely that would probably be the outcome.
 
It is so blatantly obvious that Hillary is corrupt just as it's blatantly obvious that Trump is a narcissistic blowhard. In summary - we're screwed.
 
Harry Guerrilla said:
I hope not, especially if others ordered him to do it. :(
Click to expand...

No one ever gets ordered to break the rules. They are simply told that if the team loses, they are out of a job. That's just the American way.
 
Harry Guerrilla said:
BOMBSHELL: Hillary's IT Guy Caught Asking How To Destroy Evidence!

Uh oh, this may be bad.
Click to expand...

I'm a little confused. He's presumably the guy over Hillary's emails, so it's unlikely the email address he's trying to strip is Hillary's, since they're all hers by virtue of being on her email server. So the article writer is also confused, apparently.

He even says he's trying to protect the private email address of a famous person, and replace it with something, perhaps the name of that person or an alternative address. But again, that person couldn't be Hillary. So I guess I'm not sure what looks so bad here, at least without knowing a lot more, such as the person they're trying to protect, and whether they're just trying to protect the actual email address, which I wouldn't have a problem with, or hide that the person was on the chain, which is clearly more serious, but not something I've actually care about if the email was personal in nature.
 
Some guy said he saw stuff on 8chan but can't show it to you.

Right-wingers salivate.
 
Unfortunately for Hillary, Comey and the rest of the Obama administration the House is now checking this out.

House panel looking into Reddit post about Clinton's email server | TheHill

Besides looking real bad for Hillary, the FBI is going to get a black eye from this, too.


btw, I don't know if anybody has posted this link, but it gives a bit more information...date correlations and such. Pretty damning stuff.
 
Last edited:
So voting independent this election. Or not at all.

Sigh.
 
Mycroft said:
Unfortunately for Hillary, Comey and the rest of the Obama administration the House is now checking this out.

House panel looking into Reddit post about Clinton's email server | TheHill

Besides looking real bad for Hillary, the FBI is going to get a black eye from this, too.


btw, I don't know if anybody has posted this link, but it gives a bit more information...date correlations and such. Pretty damning stuff.
Click to expand...

That's the same thing y'all said when the house chased down the right wing radioshow caller who had evidence showing a government coverup of Benghazi.

It turned up nothing btw.
 
roughdraft274 said:
That's the same thing y'all said when the house chased down the right wing radioshow caller who had evidence showing a government coverup of Benghazi.

It turned up nothing btw.
Click to expand...

Deuce said:
Republicans grasp at any straw they can find on Hillary, even when it's literally "some dude on the internet says so."

Nobody is shocked.
Click to expand...

I'll let the House decide...but really, this appears to be more than just "some dude on the internet says so".
 
Mycroft said:
I'll let the House decide...but really, this appears to be more than just "some dude on the internet says so".
Click to expand...

It doesn't appear to be more than that. But they'll chase it anyways because they are dishonest pricks.

I'm not even sure what they hope to prove. Let's say it's Hilary's guy. And let's say he really did seek out advice on how to strip out the actual email address and replace it with a name instead so as to prevent her email address from being leaked. And? That has nothing to do with altering the content, nothing to do with hiding info, nothing to do with anything by what I can see.
 
roughdraft274 said:
It doesn't appear to be more than that. But they'll chase it anyways because they are dishonest pricks.

I'm not even sure what they hope to prove. Let's say it's Hilary's guy. And let's say he really did seek out advice on how to strip out the actual email address and replace it with a name instead so as to prevent her email address from being leaked. And? That has nothing to do with altering the content, nothing to do with hiding info, nothing to do with anything by what I can see.
Click to expand...

Are you kidding????

Without her email address...which is what he wanted to remove...it couldn't be proved that the emails came from or were sent to her. Furthermore, they wouldn't come up in a search by her email address. That implies that the sole purpose would be to prevent her emails being found or attributed to her.

Don't forget, we are talking about thousands of work related...and some classified...emails. I'm thinking massive violation of federal laws and proven intent. Bad news.
 
roughdraft274 said:
It doesn't appear to be more than that. But they'll chase it anyways because they are dishonest pricks.

I'm not even sure what they hope to prove. Let's say it's Hilary's guy. And let's say he really did seek out advice on how to strip out the actual email address and replace it with a name instead so as to prevent her email address from being leaked. And? That has nothing to do with altering the content, nothing to do with hiding info, nothing to do with anything by what I can see.
Click to expand...

The House oversight committee are the dishonest pricks ?

Not the Woman who claimed the homebrew server was set up for the convenience of using one device ?

Or the woman who claimed to have turned over all her work related Emails ? Or the women who claimed she did not send or receive classified data ?

Theyre " pricks " only because they exposed Hillary for what she is, a profoundly dishonest and unethical individual and because they took the wind out of the sails of all her devoted supporters who are just as wiling as she is to lie and twist truth

Too bad ( for you and Hillary) voters aren't buying into the Hillary pitty party. More and more people are realizing that she's truly a disgusting individual
 
DVSentinel said:
The only way to really destroy data from a hard-drive is to destroy the hard-drive itself.
Click to expand...

bs you can wipe it easy with wiping software.. Easy.. Harder on solid state but still easy.. Click some buttons... wait... done..
 
Mycroft said:
Are you kidding????

Without her email address...which is what he wanted to remove...it couldn't be proved that the emails came from or were sent to her. Furthermore, they wouldn't come up in a search by her email address. That implies that the sole purpose would be to prevent her emails being found or attributed to her.

Don't forget, we are talking about thousands of work related...and some classified...emails. I'm thinking massive violation of federal laws and proven intent. Bad news.
Click to expand...

If the email address were replaced with her name then it's the same thing. And I'm not sure the issue. They printed out the emails and handed them over. Whether or no they had her email address they were handed over by Clinton so its conclusively her emails period.

If you printed me your entire inbox but redacted your email address on every page I still know they are your emails. Do you know how I know they are your emails? Because they were printed from your inbox.
 
Hi, I.T. professional here. There are some things that may link this account to him.
In a post he is troubleshooting a VPN connection. He copy/pasted a part of the log and in that log is an IP address (23.24.145.45) which belongs to a company named "ET Investments" in Colorado. It'd be interesting to know if Paul Combetta did work for that company.
He mentions (3 years ago) in a comment that he works for a 25-person Managed Service Provider (MSP) company. Paul Combetta worked for a Managed Service Provider. How many employees were there in 2013/2014?
He comments on a Rhode Island subreddit. I believe Paul is from or worked in Rhode Island.
He makes a rude remark about conservatives. Not a big clue but he clearly self-identifies as a Democrat.
He mentions his wife in a Rhode Island subredit. Is he married? He mentions her again in a thread about mistakes. He claims his mistake was getting married before he was 30. Is Paul over 30 and did he marry before 30?
He submitted a photo to /r/Awww featuring a cat and a dog. Do we know if he is a pet owner? Dogs name is Pickle.
He references an aunt, who is a school teacher, in Detroit. Can we search for her? Here is his comment "My aunt was a middle school math teacher in inner-city Detroit. She had a student who's legal name was Precious Love"
He was the owner of a 2004 Pontiac Aztek about 3 years ago. May still be the owner, not sure.
He submitted a photo of a sign his father made for a Colorado based company. The managed IT service company Paul worked for is based out of the Colorado area
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom