- Joined
- Dec 3, 2013
- Messages
- 57,470
- Reaction score
- 14,587
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
She told her daughter in private. She did not tell the public what she told her daughter...so if she lied...then it was to her daughter and not the public. But what she told her daughter was not a lie...it was raw information that was coming in from the CIA as the attacks were occurring.
It would be like you arriving on the scene of accident and smelling booze and then telling your closet friend the accident was caused by a drunk driver....when in fact, it was later determined that the accident was caused by a person who was texting while driving and the smell of booze was coming from a broken bottle of wine in the back seat. The point is...the facts at the beginning of an attack...any attack or disaster...are not always known at the beginning...and often change as more information is discovered. So you are blaming Clinton for not telling the public the information that had not been vetted by the CIA. And if she had then she would've been accused of revealing classified information. So it wouldn't matter what she did....she's never going to win with the right wing hate machine.
That is because she is a lying crooked dishonest person and has been for years.
Yet she is a democrat so instead of looking the left will do what the left always does and defend and protect
Her no matter what laws she breaks.
It isn't hate when going after someone that deserves it.
You watch the fbi will let her go. It is already set to give her a pass.
That is why lynch said that she would accept the recommendation.
the fbi has been pressured to let her off with maybe a minor infraction.
The change in attitude on this by the doj is more than suspect