Benghazi Committee Gets Nothing New From Talk Radio Caller ‘John From Iowa’

Tanngrisnir said:

This about how this wasn't a purely partisan Kabuki Theater witch hunt on the part of the republicans, all that money would have been saved.

Click to expand...

If their report hadn't revealed new information that was previously unattainable, then you would have a point... But since it did, and that information seems to paint a different picture, then it kind of blows your entire argument to hell.

I'm still wondering who the hell "john from iowa" is...
Edit: I probably should have read the OP's article link earlier.

Grim17 said:

If their report hadn't revealed new information that was previously unattainable, then you would have a point... But since it did, and that information seems to paint a different picture, then it kind of blows your entire argument to hell.

Click to expand...

No, not even remotely. There is no new information that amounts to anything substantial. Same old regurgitated bull**** for the rubes and suckers to eat up. Again: since there was no evidence of any wrongdoing on the part of Clinton or the Obama admin that this (or the 8 prior) reports found, this pretty much exonerates her.

My argument stands, based on the facts and the findings by all 9 Republican reports.

This has been a political witch hunt from day one, from Issa to Gowdy, and republicans have even admitted to that fact.

Enjoy your magical thinking. I'm not interested in it, thanks.

The Mark said:

No. Since I did not make a claim, I don't need proof.

Click to expand...

I won't belabor the point but, yes, you did make a claim ...

"Personally, I don't trust Clinton much at all, but that doesn't mean she's done everything she has been accused of..."

That's okay ... I'm guessing yours was intended as a throw-away comment like "She can't be as bad as she's portrayed" while mine was intended to say don't be so hasty.

bubbabgone said:

I won't belabor the point but, yes, you did make a claim ...

"Personally, I don't trust Clinton much at all, but that doesn't mean she's done everything she has been accused of..."

That's okay ... I'm guessing yours was intended as a throw-away comment like "She can't be as bad as she's portrayed" while mine was intended to say don't be so hasty.

Click to expand...

The only thing I meant was that it seems unlikely she has done everything she has been accused of - given some of the crazy **** I've heard her accused of, that's not at all unlikely.

I'm not claiming she hasn't done anything questionable in or around the whole benghazi thing - but I haven't heard anything even slightly significant from the various investigations that have and are going on.
I would think that, if there were something to find, they would have ****ing found it by now.

bubbabgone said:

It takes most folks longer to show them-self as a pompous jackass but you brought your game with you, didn't you.
Yessir ... right out of the box ... in every post

Click to expand...

LOL! Sorry that you can't face facts and get so emotional when they're thrown back in your face.

The Mark said:

The only thing I meant was that it seems unlikely she has done everything she has been accused of - given some of the crazy **** I've heard her accused of, that's not at all unlikely.

I'm not claiming she hasn't done anything questionable in or around the whole benghazi thing - but I haven't heard anything even slightly significant from the various investigations that have and are going on.
I would think that, if there were something to find, they would have ****ing found it by now.

Click to expand...

You could be right that a complete list of her lies is so staggering that no human could possibly be that prolific.
But observation that's even slightly deeper than cursory would tell a reasonable person that she lies with abandon.
Lying about the reason for the Benghazi attack is probably the most obvious lie in that it's been proven.
The server episode is another obvious series of lies and uncovering them sprang from the Benghazi investigations.