- Joined
- Oct 14, 2015
- Messages
- 64,267
- Reaction score
- 62,677
- Location
- Massachusetts
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
I'm pretty sure that everything that happened to Libby happened under the Bush admin. Therefore, it could not have been an example of an R not being prosecuted by an R admin, but being prosecuted on order of a newly elected D admin.
Libby prosecuted under the Obama administration, are you joking? Do you know how to google? Libby resigned from his government positions hours after his indictment on October 28, 2005... pure GWBush era.
Well, if you're so committed to attacking Hillary that you aren't even reading what I'm typing before responding to it....
Anyway, I do have to say that in general, it is rather amusing to me that pretty much every single conservative who is incensed over the Clinton emails seems to have a different version of facts.
And no one seems to have yet cited specific known facts (or if they have, it's not clear who is telling the truth because everyone is citing somewhat different facts in claiming that Clinton is guilty), specific laws these facts indicate a violation of, or even better, a case holding that similar acts committed by another person in close enough circumstances were in fact criminal.
I'm going to wait for the FBI and AG. But then, I'm not so committed to attacking Hillary as to assume that they must be protecting her.
Last edited: