• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Pro-Rape ‘Men’s Rights’ Group Plans Saturday Rally in Chicago

Peter King said:
Yes, I see a disgusting human being excuse his forcing women into something they do not want to do because he thinks that if a woman says no, that is an excuse to force his wishes through.
Click to expand...
Nonsensical drivel.

Context is everything. Stop imagining things.
 
Excon said:
Nonsensical drivel.

Context is everything. Stop imagining things.
Click to expand...

No means no, that is the context that is important, stop excusing people who force their sexual wishes on women who say NO!!
 
Peter King said:
No means no, that is the context that is important, stop excusing people who force their sexual wishes on women who say NO!!
Click to expand...
You are imagining things outside of context again.
 
Excon said:
You are imagining things outside of context again.
Click to expand...

Well, you tell yourself that. I have seen this disgusting piece of scum speak and there is nothing out of context about his comments (or his actions in forcing himself into women by force).
 
Peter King said:
Well, you tell yourself that. I have seen this disgusting piece of scum speak and there is nothing out of context about his comments (or his actions in forcing himself into women by force).
Click to expand...
Wrong.
What you think you see exists in your own imagination.


Imagination and emotive drivel is apparently all anyone has against this guy.
 
Last edited:
Excon said:
Wrong.
What you think you see exists in your own imagination.


Imagination and emotive drivel is apparently all anyone has against this guy.
Click to expand...

No, what exists is my personal observation of what this disgusting person has said.
 
Peter King said:
No means no, that is the context that is important, stop excusing people who force their sexual wishes on women who say NO!!
Click to expand...


Exactly, and any man who thinks it's okay to use force on a woman who visited his home and then declined sex -- is perverted, indeed. It doesn't matter at what point a woman declines -- once she declines -- it all stops. Or, it's rape.
 
Beaudreaux said:
Legal rape? Pro-rape?

Freedom of thought and freedom of speech allow people to openly and publicly display their lack of moral character so the rest of us know who to avoid, and the police to know who to keep an eye on.
Click to expand...

yes perfect, people reveal themselves (and so do all the fools in this thread wanting to kick him in the nuts, wishing rape on him, etc)
 
Beaudreaux said:
Or, wait until the rally is over, corner him in an alley, use a dry rotted and splintery wooden broomstick to show him how rape actually feels, and then cut his 'nads off with a red hot dull blade. No need to take a chance on spraining your ankle or jamming a toe.
Click to expand...

and what would that prove - that you're a "good guy" or "protector of women"?
like Bud Fox's father said in the movie Wall Street - "(someone) has your prick in their back pocket"

btw, do you know "how rape actually feels" or are you just parroting what someone else told you to say/think/feel on the subject?
 
Last edited:
Peter King said:
No, what exists is my personal observation of what this disgusting person has said.
Click to expand...
Which is based on your own imagination.


Imagination and emotive drivel is apparently all anyone has against this guy.
 
Excon said:
Which is based on your own imagination.


Imagination and emotive drivel is apparently all anyone has against this guy.
Click to expand...
You seem to think that he's some sort of satire comedian with a message. He's not.
 
HenryChinaski said:
You seem to think that he's some sort of satire comedian with a message. He's not.
Click to expand...
You seem to think wrong.
The article in question was satire. Period.
 
HenryChinaski said:
It is not satire. The guy is speaking how he actually feels. Period.
Click to expand...
Yes it is satire.

Only those who can not logically look at what he was saying and instead choose to engage in emotive drivel would suggest otherwise, especially when it is written and reads as satire.
 
Beaudreaux said:
Or, wait until the rally is over, corner him in an alley, use a dry rotted and splintery wooden broomstick to show him how rape actually feels, and then cut his 'nads off with a red hot dull blade. No need to take a chance on spraining your ankle or jamming a toe.
Click to expand...

I understand your anger. Expressing violent fantasies without being arrested is your privilege.

If a man expressed his thoughts about Sharon Osborne he would be jailed.

 
Is Roosh v guilty of extremely offensive speech? Of course his satires are as offensive as Jezebel article Have you beat up your boyfriend or as The View show laughing about castration of a man for a crime of initiating divorce.

But he still does good work of using his notoriety to bring attention to valid issues men have -- like discrimination of male DV victims, discrimination in sentencing, discrimination in divorce. Yes, his notoriety gives his site 2.5 million visitors per month.

ROK.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom