No, it didn't. It destroyed the ability of a union to force people to pay it dues against its will. Those people are still free to engage in collective bargaining, and many of them still do. Unions only get "gutted" by RTW to the extent that
they were already not serving the workers they claimed to represent.
That is why RTW is (ironically) actually good for unions long-term; it will force them to adapt and become customer (read: worker) oriented, to provide actual benefit for their charge.
Okay. I think because you claim to be "pro union" that you are actually "anti freedom". Does that sound like it's an accurate depiction of your stance?
...In the meantime, those with intellectual capacity and willingness to appreciate the fact that others are capable of looking at the same set of facts and coming to differing conclusions realize that seeking demagogic handles may provide easy bumper stickers, but rarely results in an accurate depiction of ones' opposition.
What, you mean like union members?
:shrug: unions have their place. And that place is activity when and where the workers perceive that they are being benefited by using them.