• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Ben Swann Debates Protester Who Says Burning Private Businesses Is A Legitimate Form

Re: Ben Swann Debates Protester Who Says Burning Private Businesses Is A Legitimate F

Redress said:
Picking low hanging fruit and taking pride in it kinda annoys me too.
Click to expand...

Unfortunately, she appears to be the most credible person they could find among the rioters.
 
Re: Ben Swann Debates Protester Who Says Burning Private Businesses Is A Legitimate F

Bigfoot 88 said:
Unfortunately, she appears to be the most credible person they could find among the rioters.
Click to expand...
Frankly, Mr Swann isn't too impressive either. He is essentially suggesting that it might be legitimate to burn down or destroy the police and fire depts. of Ferguson.
 
Re: Ben Swann Debates Protester Who Says Burning Private Businesses Is A Legitimate F

Redress said:
Picking low hanging fruit and taking pride in it kinda annoys me too.
Click to expand...

Well no one would certainly accuse you of being low hanging fruit, you want to try and argue for the rioters, looters, and arsonist scumbags?
 
Re: Ben Swann Debates Protester Who Says Burning Private Businesses Is A Legitimate F

lizzie said:
Frankly, Mr Swann isn't too impressive either. He is essentially suggesting that it might be legitimate to burn down or destroy the police and fire depts. of Ferguson.
Click to expand...

His point though was the show the contradiction in this movement though, not so much to advocate it Lizzie.
 
Re: Ben Swann Debates Protester Who Says Burning Private Businesses Is A Legitimate F

lizzie said:
Frankly, Mr Swann isn't too impressive either. He is essentially suggesting that it might be legitimate to burn down or destroy the police and fire depts. of Ferguson.
Click to expand...

I think his point is that they at least have some connection. I believe Swann made clear that it would make sense only if one assumed violence was the answer.

The non-logic of the rioters is to get mad, run around yelling unintelligible crap, destroying stuff, attacking people, and generally terrorizing the community.
 
Re: Ben Swann Debates Protester Who Says Burning Private Businesses Is A Legitimate F

Hamster Buddha said:
Well no one would certainly accuse you of being low hanging fruit, you want to try and argue for the rioters, looters, and arsonist scumbags?
Click to expand...

Why would I argue for people I disagree with?
 
Re: Ben Swann Debates Protester Who Says Burning Private Businesses Is A Legitimate F

Redress said:
Why would I argue for people I disagree with?
Click to expand...

My mistake, when you mentioned the low hanging fruit, that is to assume there is some high hanging fruit then yes? I thought you might be that. In other words, someone more intelligent that agreed with her position and would argue it. Didn't take it as you disagreed.
 
Re: Ben Swann Debates Protester Who Says Burning Private Businesses Is A Legitimate F

Bigfoot 88 said:
...run around yelling unintelligible crap, destroying stuff, attacking people, and generally terrorizing the community.
Click to expand...

Thats actually pretty standard behavior in such neighborhoods.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom