• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

CNN: Michael Brown autopsy “expert” may be a fraud

apdst

apdst

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 23, 2009
Messages
133,631
Reaction score
30,937
Location
Bagdad, La.
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Conservative
Oh yeah, let's send this case to trial! Tons of credible evidence; more than enough to get a conviction. As sad as it is that so many sheisters have surfaced, to condenn Wilson, I can't help but laugh.

So who is “Professor” Shawn Parcells? He’s not a professor, he’s not a doctor, and he’s not qualified to work unassisted on autopsies either, as CNN discovered. In fact, his interference in another case allowed a murderer to go free, and the college at which he claims adjunct status says they never hired him in that capacity. Is Shawn Parcells just a remarkable auto-didact, or “a very good con artist” as law enforcement considers him (via Chuck Lane)?


CNN: Michael Brown autopsy “expert” may be a fraud « Hot Air
Click to expand...

The broken record from the pro-Browners is, "I still have questions".

I have a question, too: Why is there so many people from the Michael Brown side of the issue being exposed as liars and, at best, non-credible?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom