• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Reporter Suspended For Defending Evolution Comes Back, Gives Immediate Middle Finger

Re: Reporter Suspended For Defending Evolution Comes Back, Gives Immediate Middle Fin

you have fossil but they do not show what you think they show. there is 0 evidence of transition fossils more so from one species to another.
even evolutionist say they don't exist so I don't see how you can keep up with the façade is beyond me.

there are 0 fossil that depict a macro-evolutionary change from one species to another. to deny this is to live in scientific loony land.

You are terribly ignorant on the subject. You should read up and try to understand the overwhelming research and proof.

Your faith has made you quite ignorant, you can't understand actual proven science.

You think evolution is a frog turning into a bird. You have no actual knowledge, because you refuse to actually read and understand and think.

Keep living in lunatic creationist land.
 
Re: Reporter Suspended For Defending Evolution Comes Back, Gives Immediate Middle Fin

LOL wiki. no there isn't there are no fossils that exist that link that humans evolved from apes.
if you want to continue that faulty logic then apes should still be evolving into humans ol wait they aren't.\

Oh jesus christ. That's not at all how it works.

And yes, there are plenty of transitional fossils.
 
Re: Reporter Suspended For Defending Evolution Comes Back, Gives Immediate Middle Fin

Oh jesus christ. That's not at all how it works.

And yes, there are plenty of transitional fossils.

What a fundamental misunderstanding of what evolution is.
 
Re: Reporter Suspended For Defending Evolution Comes Back, Gives Immediate Middle Fin

Well, all you've proven with this post is that you have no clue how evolution works.

that is what evolutionist say happened it isn't me saying it. it is exactly what Darwin said. that we evolved from apes.
if so I think you need to go tell the people spouting this *evolutionists* that they don't know what they are talking about.

although I found it interesting that you ignored comments made by evolutionists themselves that I posted.
I wonder why that is?

ol yea they even know that evolution is bunk.

I quoted you several evolutionists personal beliefs.
 
Re: Reporter Suspended For Defending Evolution Comes Back, Gives Immediate Middle Fin

that is what evolutionist say happened it isn't me saying it. it is exactly what Darwin said. that we evolved from apes.
if so I think you need to go tell the people spouting this *evolutionists* that they don't know what they are talking about.

although I found it interesting that you ignored comments made by evolutionists themselves that I posted.
I wonder why that is?

ol yea they even know that evolution is bunk.

I quoted you several evolutionists personal beliefs.

The continued existence of apes doesn't contradict evolution. Let me explain this to you:

Evolution is not a straight line. It's more like a branching tree. We didn't "evolve from monkeys," we share a common ancestor with monkeys. (and chimpanzees and gorrillas and so on).

At some point, ape-like species split into several branches, and on one of those branches you find us. On another branch, you find monkeys.

Homo erectus, on the other hand, isn't around anymore.
 
Last edited:
Re: Reporter Suspended For Defending Evolution Comes Back, Gives Immediate Middle Fin


nope I just know of all the fake attempts that have been tried to link the two.

PS scientists still haven't found the common ancestor or the missing link. so far all of the fossils they have found pretty much say humans are humans.
Skull of Homo erectus throws story of human evolution into disarray | Science | The Guardian

lol to funny every new discovery points back to one thing. humans begat humans. they didn't come from apes.
 
Re: Reporter Suspended For Defending Evolution Comes Back, Gives Immediate Middle Fin

The continued existence of apes doesn't contradict evolution. Let me explain this to you:

Evolution is not a straight line. It's more like a branching tree. We didn't "evolve from monkeys," we share a common ancestor with monkeys. (and chimpanzees and gorrillas and so on).

At some point, ape-like species split into several branches, and on one of those branches you find us. On another branch, you find monkeys.

and now the strawman argument of why they don't.

sorry according to evolutionist it doesn't stop so there is no reason that monkey should stop evolving into humans. however we know where humans come from.
that is other humans not apes.

they have not found the common ancestor. the oldest skull found is 1.8m years old please see the article I posted.
it shows again the humans begat humans there is no common ancestor. it simply doesn't exist and they have never found it.

yes I know they came up with the whole common ancestor nonsense because they couldn't prove the other. every so called missing link discover was false or fake.

I really like the one where the so called skull cap was nothing more than an elephant kneecap.
yet it was herald as one of the most scientific discoveries of all time till well they figured out that it wasn't what they thought.
 
Re: Reporter Suspended For Defending Evolution Comes Back, Gives Immediate Middle Fin

...

Homo erectus, on the other hand, isn't around anymore.

You obviously haven't met my brother in law.
 
Re: Reporter Suspended For Defending Evolution Comes Back, Gives Immediate Middle Fin

nope I just know of all the fake attempts that have been tried to link the two.

PS scientists still haven't found the common ancestor or the missing link. so far all of the fossils they have found pretty much say humans are humans.
Skull of Homo erectus throws story of human evolution into disarray | Science | The Guardian

lol to funny every new discovery points back to one thing. humans begat humans. they didn't come from apes.


Your whole argument is that you don't accept evolution, but you have no proof. None.

You just feel that it is wrong. Go and take the scientific community by storm, publish your proof, be a hero.

Till then, it is the same old cretard baloney that no one, outside of the scientifically illiterate creationists accept.
 
Re: Reporter Suspended For Defending Evolution Comes Back, Gives Immediate Middle Fin

So am I safe to assume that X-Factor has abandoned this thread after we constantly pointed out his grossly large level of dishonestly?
 
Re: Reporter Suspended For Defending Evolution Comes Back, Gives Immediate Middle Fin


Homo sapiens are apes.


Thanks for proving you don't understand this topic.

Indeed it means, "the wise ape". However, we are not apes and we do not fit in that taxonomy. And it's Homo Sapiens sapiens. We are a subspecies in the sapiens line.
 
Re: Reporter Suspended For Defending Evolution Comes Back, Gives Immediate Middle Fin

Indeed it means, "the wise ape". However, we are not apes and we do not fit in that taxonomy. And it's Homo Sapiens sapiens. We are a subspecies in the sapiens line.

Homo Sapiens are a branch of great apes. We accurately more primates, but the notion that humans evolved from apes and that apes aren't around because of that is certified 100% ignorance.
 
Re: Reporter Suspended For Defending Evolution Comes Back, Gives Immediate Middle Fin

Homo Sapiens are a branch of great apes. We accurately more primates, but the notion that humans evolved from apes and that apes aren't around because of that is certified 100% ignorance.

You're almost there and I won't address the blather about the originating species disappearing automatically because a new species or subspecies emerges. I do take a little exception with likening us to a group of primates that are a rather distant source. It's like comparing a birthday cake to a grain of wheat.

And again, it's Homo Sapiens sapiens. There were other subspecies that shared the Homo Sapiens name. In fact our direct ancestor sub-species, Homo sapiens idaltu also had modern human anatomy.
 
Last edited:
Re: Reporter Suspended For Defending Evolution Comes Back, Gives Immediate Middle Fin

You think the question of evolution/creation is settled? Lol.

Thanks for demonstrating the wisdom of this quote (since I know how much you like quotes).

"Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover that there are other views." ---William F. Buckley, Jr.

Yes, it is settled. This is a false dichotomy also, evolution could be wrong, all the evidence points to it being right, but it could be wrong. However, if it is, that doesn't mean creation is right; you must prove that something is right. Science has no room for faith.
 
Re: Reporter Suspended For Defending Evolution Comes Back, Gives Immediate Middle Fin

You're almost there and I won't address the blather about the originating species disappearing automatically because a new species or subspecies emerges.

The originating species disappearing is always something creationists cite. There is actually no reason that the originating species can't stay the same if parts of its population are geographically isolated in an environment that doesn't materially favor any new mutation. The whole "if man evolved from monkeys, why are there still monkeys" line is a classic example of creationist ignorance.

I do take a little exception with likenong us to a group of primates that are a rather distant source. It's like comparing a birthday cake to a grain of wheat.

Meh. Ultimately we are genetically very similar to other primates and apes. I don't believe that simply because we are the dominant species that it's somehow degrading to us to accept that we are genetically not much different from them. Hell, we share like 70% of our DNA with starfish. It is what it is and we should simply just accept that is how we got here. Rather than try to cast an aura of religious superiority that effectively stems from the argument "if someone took the time to write it down it must be true."

And again, it's Homo Sapiens sapiens. There were other subspecies that shared the Homo Sapiens name. In fact our direct ancestor sub-species, Homo sapiens idaltu also had modern human anatomy.

One also has to remember that classification is an artificial system that man kind created. Yes, our ancestors had human anatomy, and their ancestors slightly less until we go back to where apes and primates split and where our branch diverged from other apes. Doesn't change the fact that we are very much in the ape/primate branch of life.
 
Re: Reporter Suspended For Defending Evolution Comes Back, Gives Immediate Middle Fin

The originating species disappearing is always something creationists cite. There is actually no reason that the originating species can't stay the same if parts of its population are geographically isolated in an environment that doesn't materially favor any new mutation. The whole "if man evolved from monkeys, why are there still monkeys" line is a classic example of creationist ignorance.

Again, not my issue and it is blather. The old species doesn't disappear the day the new species is born.

Meh. Ultimately we are genetically very similar to other primates and apes. I don't believe that simply because we are the dominant species that it's somehow degrading to us to accept that we are genetically not much different from them. Hell, we share like 70% of our DNA with starfish. It is what it is and we should simply just accept that is how we got here. Rather than try to cast an aura of religious superiority that effectively stems from the argument "if someone took the time to write it down it must be true."

My issue is with the anti-religious nutters that insist upon stirring the pot with these comparisons. They do not compare mankind with the starfish. The ONLY reason they choose apes for source point is to wind up the religious folk. We are genetically similar in ways to all life on Earth, but we are a thing alone, different from other species and sub-species as they are from one another.

One also has to remember that classification is an artificial system that man kind created. Yes, our ancestors had human anatomy, and their ancestors slightly less until we go back to where apes and primates split and where our branch diverged from other apes. Doesn't change the fact that we are very much in the ape/primate branch of life.

As is time, as are quite a number of things man has developed. These are artificial classifications useful to us in understanding the universe around us. They are also useful in informing about differences. WE are NOT the same sub-species as out ancestors. Hell, we're not even the same species going back far enough. And actually, rather than ape, we come more from the lemur line.
 
Re: Reporter Suspended For Defending Evolution Comes Back, Gives Immediate Middle Fin

My issue is with the anti-religious nutters that insist upon stirring the pot with these comparisons. They do not compare mankind with the starfish. The ONLY reason they choose apes for source point is to wind up the religious folk. We are genetically similar in ways to all life on Earth, but we are a thing alone, different from other species and sub-species as they are from one another.

Actually, Apes get chosen because they are genetically the most similar living organisms to humans these days, not to rile up the Creationists. I compare mankind with starfish to remind people that we all came from the same place. I'd argue that it's the creationists who use apes/monkeys to rile each up over evolution.

As is time, as are quite a number of things man has developed.

Of course, that's why we aren't the same as they are. But it does not mean we are not genetically part of the same branch.

These are artificial classifications useful to us in understanding the universe around us. They are also useful in informing about differences. WE are NOT the same sub-species as out ancestors. Hell, we're not even the same species going back far enough. And actually, rather than ape, we come more from the lemur line.

Humans have a great need to label things. A quote from Babylon 5 just got stuck in my head with that line: "I find that humans have an incessant need to name things."

We are what we are and we should simply accept where are on the evolutionary tree.
 
Re: Reporter Suspended For Defending Evolution Comes Back, Gives Immediate Middle Fin

and now the strawman argument of why they don't.

sorry according to evolutionist it doesn't stop so there is no reason that monkey should stop evolving into humans. however we know where humans come from.
that is other humans not apes.

they have not found the common ancestor. the oldest skull found is 1.8m years old please see the article I posted.
it shows again the humans begat humans there is no common ancestor. it simply doesn't exist and they have never found it.

yes I know they came up with the whole common ancestor nonsense because they couldn't prove the other. every so called missing link discover was false or fake.

I really like the one where the so called skull cap was nothing more than an elephant kneecap.
yet it was herald as one of the most scientific discoveries of all time till well they figured out that it wasn't what they thought.

Once again, you have no idea what you're talking about.
 
Re: Reporter Suspended For Defending Evolution Comes Back, Gives Immediate Middle Fin

and now the strawman argument of why they don't.

sorry according to evolutionist it doesn't stop so there is no reason that monkey should stop evolving into humans.

I literally just explained to you why this is wrong. Did you read my post? Was there any part of it you don't understand?

Monkeys never evolved into humans. Monkeys share an ape-like ancestor with humans. That ancestor isn't around any more, so it doesn't continue to evolve into anything.

Humans are not the next step from monkeys. We're on a different path entirely.
 
Last edited:
Re: Reporter Suspended For Defending Evolution Comes Back, Gives Immediate Middle Fin

Again, not my issue and it is blather. The old species doesn't disappear the day the new species is born.



My issue is with the anti-religious nutters that insist upon stirring the pot with these comparisons. They do not compare mankind with the starfish. The ONLY reason they choose apes for source point is to wind up the religious folk. We are genetically similar in ways to all life on Earth, but we are a thing alone, different from other species and sub-species as they are from one another.



As is time, as are quite a number of things man has developed. These are artificial classifications useful to us in understanding the universe around us. They are also useful in informing about differences. WE are NOT the same sub-species as out ancestors. Hell, we're not even the same species going back far enough. And actually, rather than ape, we come more from the lemur line.

Uhh, people use apes because they are our closest relatives. How hard is that to figure out?

Nobody is doing it to "wind up religious folk." Why would that "wind up" religious folk? Is it somehow insulting to religious people that we share a common ancestor with chimpanzees? Because if reality offends you, well, tough. Because I can't do anything about that.
 
Re: Reporter Suspended For Defending Evolution Comes Back, Gives Immediate Middle Fin

You think the question of evolution/creation is settled? Lol.

It sure as hell is settled... we don't know all of the details, like gravity, but that does not mean we are uncertain as to fact.
 
Re: Reporter Suspended For Defending Evolution Comes Back, Gives Immediate Middle Fin

nope I just know of all the fake attempts that have been tried to link the two.

PS scientists still haven't found the common ancestor or the missing link. so far all of the fossils they have found pretty much say humans are humans.
Skull of Homo erectus throws story of human evolution into disarray | Science | The Guardian

lol to funny every new discovery points back to one thing. humans begat humans. they didn't come from apes.

That is false. There were monkey species, Neanderthal, homo-erectus and homo-sapiens all living together at the same time. Homo-Sapiens out survived the other two species of hominid and evidence is showing that Australopithecus sediba might have been a fourth species of hominid, perhaps an ancestor and one of the missing links of the homo-species.
 
Back
Top Bottom