Re: Reporter Suspended For Defending Evolution Comes Back, Gives Immediate Middle Fin
I don't think you know what "dogma" means.
dogma can be applied in many ways. yes rapid evolutionists are dogmatic about their beliefs.
they will ignore all evidence odds and science that requires an organism to even begin a single species let along form a
totally different species.
Macro evolution has never ever been proven.
From Jeffery Schwartz Professor of anthropology at the university of Pittsburgh.
it was and still is the case that, with the exception of Dobzhansky's claim about a new species of fruit fly, the formation of a new species, by any mechanism, has never been observed
the fruit fly experiment did nothing but create more fruit flys, maybe a different variety but still just a fruit fly.
from 14.N. A. Takahata, "Genetic Perspective on the Origin and History of Humans," Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics (vol. 26, 1995), p. 343.
Even with DNA sequence data, we have no direct access to the processes of evolution, so objective reconstruction of the vanished past can be achieved only by creative imagination
a known evolutionist Peter Bowler reviewed a book by an even more ardent evolutionist Henry Gee.
he writes.
The consequence of all this, the cladists insist, is that all the old paraphernalia of evolutionary explanations must be dismissed as unscientific speculation. All we can do is assess degrees of relationship. We cannot identify ancestors or "missing links," and we cannot devise testable theories to explain how particular episodes of evolution came about. Gee is adamant that all the popular stories about how the first amphibians conquered the dry land, how the birds developed wings and feathers for flying, how the dinosaurs went extinct and how humans evolved from apes are just products of our imagination driven by prejudices and preconceptions. They reflect our modern ideas about the purposes of adaptive structures and about the progressive trend we think we see in the history of life up to humankind. They cannot be part of science because they cannot be tested against the fossil record.
