HogWash
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 12, 2014
- Messages
- 997
- Reaction score
- 421
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Other
It might take a little more than that. How many votes did you get?
My sister-in-law voted for me.
It might take a little more than that. How many votes did you get?
Lol, I own 3 houses in 3 different countries. All 3 of them are valued at over $500K. I don't need anyone to pay my way through life, champ.
You were the one who argued that the rich should pay their fair share. I agreed. :shrug:
Same man who preaches about the wealthy not paying enough taxes.
Yet, MSNBC marches on with him.
Why ignore the rest of my post? Did you realize that the 'it happened a long time ago' was a non-starter? Did you realize you were downplaying sexual assault by sarcastically saying that Bill Cosby was a monster for fondling women? I would back off from that type of argument too. Anyways, I looked up any news on Bill Cosby from 2000 to 2006 and most of the news articles on it are either no longer in existence in their native sites or they're on secondary sources:
Naaa, that's what happens when groupies chase stars.
What the hell was Cosby doing in her apartment? Did he kick the door in? This latest bunch is just bull****.
Besides this thread is about Sharpton OWING $4.5 million in unpaid, delinquent taxes.
I’m not sure what you are blabbering on about.
This is a non-starter. Statute of limitations makes these PR problems, not legal problems.
His PR problems began after making his infamous pound cake speech (which was dead on accurate)
It seems like just about every rich person has skeletons like this in their closets. They all cheat in order to get where they are.
That would be true if multiple women hadn't come forward before he made the speech. Either way, what relevance does the speech have to being accused of sexual assault? Did Bill Clinton's position on women's rights have anything to do with the accusations lobbed at him after he became president? Not really. Your attempt to downplay sexual assault is noted though. Do you believe rich and powerful men are above question when it comes to sexual assault? Do you believe time is relevant when dealing with it? You don't have to answer those questions. You've already demonstrated you're willing to be an apologist for sexual assault. However, please answer these questions:
If it was proven that Bill Cosby assaulted some of these women, would it make a difference if it was 10-20-30 years ago?
Would it make him less of a predator?
They're simple Yes & No questions.
We have a statute of limitations for good reason.
Bill Cosby is in the news right now because someone took major exception with his pound cake speech.
That is a fact.
That is the event that brought this back into the news. The media, for whatever reason, has decided to dive into these allegations that were long forgotten even though the length of time makes it virtually impossible to get a conviction.
If he hadn't made the pound cake speech, a fellow comedian wouldn't of attacked him, and he wouldn't be in the news today.
The rich people I know got rich from hard work and being smart. Maybe you know the wrong kind of people.
That is entirely irrelevant to what I asked. Your avoidance of the questions doesn't change that.
Someone took major exception with a speech he made a decade ago?
That is not irrelevant. If you don’t have the grey matter to see how that answers your question, then that’s on you
"I've been doing the bit on and off for six months. It was unexpected. It wasn't my intention to make it part of a big discussion," Buress told Stern. "It was just something I was doing at that venue right there. So for someone to put it to the media, it's crazy."
"It's just information that's out there," Buress added. "I said it and I gotta stand on it, but it is an interesting situation."
Cosby's allegations were already mildly well-known, but footage of the joke went viral, and suddenly, word of the comic's troubled past hit the mainstream.
My sister-in-law voted for me.
It is irrelevant because it doesn't answer anything. Here, I'll make it simple for you: Does time make a person less of a rapist?
You need to read your sources instead of just posting ad-hoc:
Does time make a person less of a rapist?
I ask because you keep citing time as a relevant factor in whether this is important or not. If it happened 30 years ago, would it make a difference?
he adamantly supports a tax increase on the wealthy, yet won't pay his "fair share"?....imagine that.
it would be funny to see him go to prison , but he has too many friends in the establishment for that to happen
I kinda liked it.
I still kinda liked it.And yet the right wing screams soo much about the "race card"... :roll:
I agree, the rich should be made to pay their fair share like the rest of us. Ain't it great when ideologies agree?
Whoops, I thought you were a young money millionare? That was your Sig for awhile wasn't it????? Ummm
You're trying too hard. That's especially obvious when you don't understand mockery. Now run along. People from politically relevant places are talking. :lol:
Bill Cosby hasn't been a relevant star in Hollywood in like 20+ years. Also, there are far more believable targets than an old decrepit man. Either way, your apologetics aren't helping his case. Essentially, you're regurgitating every line thrown out by pass offenders.
I thought the thread was about how black people don't go to jail for not paying taxes?
I oughta try that. I don't inow if that's legal in Louisiana.
You thought wrong. It was about the New York Times article concerning the SoBs delinquent income taxes...something for which most white people would go to prison for income tax evasion.
Oh got it, you are a rich millionare you're just pretending your not to mock other rich people like yourself.. Yeah that really adds up, somebody likes to talk out of their arse. Lol... Busted!!
Really? They ALL cheat? Earning what they have through hard work and/or ingenuity makes every damn rich person a crook? What the hell does that make all the freeloading, lazy ass government teat suckers? You know, those bums that live off we taxpayers?