- Joined
- Jun 20, 2008
- Messages
- 106,843
- Reaction score
- 98,895
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Wifi!
Yup. Wi-fi. I didn't like my service, so I just got wi-fi instead.
Dayum.
Wifi!
Wow.
Pop quiz, everyone: how is apdst able to function on the internet? How was he able to connect in the first place? The only answer that makes any conceivable sense is that somebody set all of this up for him.
Yup. Wi-fi. I didn't like my service, so I just got wi-fi instead.
Dayum.
I have wifi. Must not be all that difficult.
So somebody set all this up for you then. Okay, everybody, pop quiz #2: if net neutrality does indeed come to an end (permanently, I mean), who will apdst blame for his internet experience turning to crap and he's forced to pay for a hundred additional services?
a)Obama? Or,
b)ISP's lobbying to end net neutrality?
Is your argument so weak that you have to insult me?
:dohThen answer the questions and debate honestly.
:dohNo. You still don't get it.
Net neutrality means what I said it means. It does not mean what you said it means. It never meant that. All these other regulations you are talking about? Those are not net neutrality. Net neutrality is not title II regulation. Net neutrality is exactly one thing, and I already told you what that was. Nobody uses the term "net neutrality" the way you are using it. Except you.
If you use a word in a way nobody else in the world uses it, confusion is your problem, not theirs.
Wrong again Kobie. Your whole diversion has been.Your entire attempt at a response is laughably dumb.
It's a fair question. If this really is in fact the end of net neutrality and your internet experience worsens, who will you blame?
Ahh, you exckuded the insults, this time. It almost appears that uou want to have a real conversation. Good deal!
What makes you so certain that our internet experience will worsen?
The isps paid $742,000 to politicians and successfully sued the FCC last January in order to end net neutrality, so it's clear they wish to behave differently than they have been for the past 25 years. If the result of this is that your internet experience worsens, who will you blame?
How will they behave differently? It sounds more like your argument is, "private companies are evil and we need the government to takeover".
No, I said they will behave differently. The isps spent a lot of money to ensure they will be able to, so if the result of this is that your internet experience worsens, who will you blame? Simple question, apdst.
They sued because the FCC overstepped it's authority.The isps paid $742,000 to politicians and successfully sued the FCC last January in order to end net neutrality,
No, I said they will behave differently. The isps spent a lot of money to ensure they will be able to, so if the result of this is that your internet experience worsens, who will you blame? Simple question, apdst.
The unbridled hackery on the part of a few of the conservatives (and one so-called independent) on this thread is absolutely astounding.
If only George Bush or Rush Limbaugh would come out in favor of this these conservatives like Fletch would change their position quicker than ****.
If only George Bush or Rush Limbaugh would come out in favor of this these conservatives like Fletch would change their position quicker than ****.
The thread isn't about me! :lamo
How about we wait and see what happens before rushing into the arms of the benevolent state?
Okay, so if this is the end of net neutrality and people's internet use worsens as a result, who will be to blame?
We already were in "the arms of the benevolent state." That's why we had net neutrality up until last January.
You would be wrong. But I suspect you are used to that by now.
Is there any liberal left capable of honest debate? If so, please step forward.