• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Krauthammer: 'Impeachable Offense' [W:406]

Re: Krauthammer: 'Impeachable Offense'

Yeah. I will accept that you are anti-American in your outlook. You are dangerous to American citizens.

Americans had most, if not all of the construction jobs before illegal aliens showed up and did the work for a fraction of what Americans were paid. Why do you hate poor American citizens?

That's fine. In fact I'm glad that you view me as anti American and dangerous. Not because I am - I'm not - but because that sentiment holds just about as much intelligence as
your xenophobic attitude does and I'd have to reassess my opinion of your positions generally if any of them should any kind of careful consideration.
 
Just how Leftist are you? Nore than you claim.

First of all, YOU were the one who said I was more left than I was saying so it is up to YOU to prove that claim.
I said I believe you are more left that you believe you are or you claim to be. How does one prove that? Do I go find every utterance you have ever made and run a statistical analysis of the leftist phrases among them and compare them with the neutral and rightist phrases? Or do I go with my intuition?

Here is a five minute search that shows how lazy and lying your comments are. All links to me bashing the Dems or Obama. Now, are you going to be man enough to admit you were wrong or simply weasel out as usual? I'm guessing you won't man up since we know what type of conservative you are.
Bashing dems is like destroying ISIS by occasionally killing a fighter or two. It is ineffective. I think you know it. You are still more left than you claim.

Note, you haven't provided ONE link of evidence, not ONE.
Nor will I. It is a fools errand which you are better suited to do. Let's take just the first one to see how much you bash Obama
http://www.debatepolitics.com/gener...golf-than-intel-briefings.html#post1063865010

That is all fine and I agree he is a horrible president, however, there is no link to him missing briefings for golfing so that cartoon and article are pointless.

Yours or my opinion on what constitutes "deserving" doesn't make it fact.

The article and cartoon seem to try and link golfing to intel briefings, but they have NOTHING in common as he hasn't missed a majority of briefings due to golfing. Further more, Bush and others have taken more vacation time than Obama.​
Right that is real powerful bashing. LOL. I see no reason to go any further given that you chose this to prove how hard you are on Obama. You cannot see just how leftist you are. Peas in a pod...
 
Re: Krauthammer: 'Impeachable Offense'

"Yeah. I will accept that you are anti-American in your outlook. You are dangerous to American citizens.

Americans had most, if not all of the construction jobs before illegal aliens showed up and did the work for a fraction of what Americans were paid. Why do you hate poor American citizens?"
That's fine. In fact I'm glad that you view me as anti American and dangerous. Not because I am - I'm not - but because that sentiment holds just about as much intelligence as
your xenophobic attitude does and I'd have to reassess my opinion of your positions generally if any of them should any kind of careful consideration.
New York liberal. No doubt there are more of you. You are dangerous to others and not only to yourself.

And you deny that you are dangerous. I suppose from your perspective diluting American citizenship is not dangerous. After all, without 30-50 million new poor, illiterate, democrats how will one party rule be accomplished?
 
Re: Krauthammer: 'Impeachable Offense'

It's not my government (I'm Canadian). Just out of curiosity, were you calling for Bush's execution when he repeatedly lied? Bush's lies cost trillions of dollars and thousands of American lives. Obama's "lies" resulted in a superior health care system (ultimately saving lives).
Point out Bush's lies. Let's examine them. Did Bush ever try to fundamentally transform the nation or implement one party rule through encouraging an invasion and then declaring an amnesty on the invaders?
 
Re: Krauthammer: 'Impeachable Offense'

It's not my government (I'm Canadian). Just out of curiosity, were you calling for Bush's execution when he repeatedly lied? Bush's lies cost trillions of dollars and thousands of American lives. Obama's "lies" resulted in a superior health care system (ultimately saving lives).
We have differing opinions on what Obama is doing. The health care system has been damaged. It is not yet fully implemented. He lied about everything. First impeachment and conviction. Then a trial for treason. And finally capital punishment and execution. Execution comes last, not first.
 
Re: Krauthammer: 'Impeachable Offense'

Why does it matter if he's confined to a wheelchair? I fail to see the significance.

Did you read what I quoted? Apparently not.
 
Re: Krauthammer: 'Impeachable Offense'

"Yeah. I will accept that you are anti-American in your outlook. You are dangerous to American citizens.

Americans had most, if not all of the construction jobs before illegal aliens showed up and did the work for a fraction of what Americans were paid. Why do you hate poor American citizens?"

New York liberal. No doubt there are more of you. You are dangerous to others and not only to yourself.

And you deny that you are dangerous. I suppose from your perspective diluting American citizenship is not dangerous. After all, without 30-50 million new poor, illiterate, democrats how will one party rule be accomplished?

Lol. Libertarian does not equal liberal. For the record I think both parties suck.

I come from recent immigrants. I recognize that we are nation of immigrants with a long history of welcoming people. I recognize that immigration is what has made this country strong. I recognize that the hundreds of ethnicities I'm exposed to daily has
made my life immeasurably better. I recognize that people who are trying to put food on their table will run risks and do things that they wouldn't otherwise normally and I for one am loath to stop a father from feeding his kids. I recognize that my being born
here is completely a matter of luck and I could just as easily been born in some ****hole somewhere worrying about were my next meal is coming instead of arguing immigration from the comfort of my climate controlled living room.
 
Re: Krauthammer: 'Impeachable Offense'

Lol. Libertarian does not equal liberal. For the record I think both parties suck.
True. In general anyway.

I come from recent immigrants. I recognize that we are nation of immigrants with a long history of welcoming people. I recognize that immigration is what has made this country strong. I recognize that the hundreds of ethnicities I'm exposed to daily has
made my life immeasurably better. I recognize that people who are trying to put food on their table will run risks and do things that they wouldn't otherwise normally and I for one am loath to stop a father from feeding his kids. I recognize that my being born
here is completely a matter of luck and I could just as easily been born in some ****hole somewhere worrying about were my next meal is coming instead of arguing immigration from the comfort of my climate controlled living room.
This nation belongs to American citizens. It does not belong to illegal alien invaders.

We need to slow the pace of immigration and we need to return control over immigration to the Congress and not to the alien.

Immigration is no longer improving the nation because we are encouraging the poorest, the ones who are illiterate even in their own language, the sickest, and the least educated. They are a drain on American citizens in most communities. It is not fair for the American citizen to be placed in line behind the illegals.

The father you mention above can stay in his country and change it. If you like you can go there and help him. Neither you nor he has the right to steal from me because your theft enriches your life.
 
Re: Krauthammer: 'Impeachable Offense'

I am not sure what you mean by that. It is true Obama lacks Clinton's charisma and the ability to connect with the people that Clinton could do. But by lacking those qualities, does that mean it is okay to go ahead and impeach Obama? I do not think the American public is ready for impeachment hearings or more important, want them. One may be dissatisfied with the job the president is doing, but that doesn't mean you want him run out of town on a rail either.

It means he will not have the support of those under his spell as well as Clinton could get.
 
Re: Krauthammer: 'Impeachable Offense'

True. In general anyway.


This nation belongs to American citizens. It does not belong to illegal alien invaders.

We need to slow the pace of immigration and we need to return control over immigration to the Congress and not to the alien.

Immigration is no longer improving the nation because we are encouraging the poorest, the ones who are illiterate even in their own language, the sickest, and the least educated. They are a drain on American citizens in most communities. It is not fair for the American citizen to be placed in line behind the illegals.

The father you mention above can stay in his country and change it. If you like you can go there and help him. Neither you nor he has the right to steal from me because your theft enriches your life.

My Sicilian forebears came through Ellis Island in the early part of the last century. They were dirt poor farmers. They weren't illiterate, they could speak Italian, but their reading skills were non existent. Even to the day they died both my grandmothers
were far more comfortable with Italian than English and that's what we largely spoke around them. Both of my grandfathers gained US citizenship by serving in the US Army during WWI.

All that's to say I don't see a whole hell of a lot of difference between the poor coming here today and my family and those who came from Europe with them.

As to stealing from you there is ample evidence that illegals on balance cost you nothing. Jobs? If Americans wanted those jobs illegals wouldn't have them.
 
Re: Krauthammer: 'Impeachable Offense'

Why does it matter if he's confined to a wheelchair? I fail to see the significance.

I guess you thought you were being clever with the age-smack when you posted, "Don't deflate Krauthammer's big erection. At his age he doesn't get them very often." Dr. Krauthammer is a quadriplegic, which you must not have known because you surely wouldn't stoop this low. :3oops:
 
Re: Krauthammer: 'Impeachable Offense'

It means he will not have the support of those under his spell as well as Clinton could get.

Obama is not Clinton and that is for sure. But I would watch out for impeachment nonetheless.
 
Re: Krauthammer: 'Impeachable Offense'

"Really? Do you have a list? How did Reagan lie to give us Obamacare? When did Reagan provide guns to Mexican drug cartels to discredit American gun ownership and to soften us up for gun confiscation? When did Reagan lie about how his ambassador and three other Americans were murdered while he prepared for a fund raiser?"

You made the claim that Reagan and Bush did exactly the same thing (committed the same crimes) as Obama has and continues to do.

If you cannot make the case, tell the truth, then not posting is the better option.

Oh please: I'm talking about immigration. The rest of your post is just silly nonsense.
 
Re: Krauthammer: 'Impeachable Offense'

Point out Bush's lies. Let's examine them. Did Bush ever try to fundamentally transform the nation or implement one party rule through encouraging an invasion and then declaring an amnesty on the invaders?

False pretenses | Center for Public Integrity

President George W. Bush and seven of his administration's top officials, including Vice President Dick Cheney, National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, made at least 935 false statements in the two years following September 11, 2001, about the national security threat posed by Saddam Hussein's Iraq. Nearly five years after the U.S. invasion of Iraq, an exhaustive examination of the record shows that the statements were part of an orchestrated campaign that effectively galvanized public opinion and, in the process, led the nation to war under decidedly false pretenses.

On at least 532 separate occasions (in speeches, briefings, interviews, testimony, and the like), Bush and these three key officials, along with Secretary of State Colin Powell, Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz, and White House press secretaries Ari Fleischer and Scott McClellan, stated unequivocally that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction (or was trying to produce or obtain them), links to Al Qaeda, or both. This concerted effort was the underpinning of the Bush administration's case for war.
 
Re: Krauthammer: 'Impeachable Offense'

And amnesty will lead to a one-party system in the US.

I respond to posts. Just as you have. If you like this lying regime then you will love amnesty.

It's pretty neat racist to assume that an entire ethnic group will vote for one party in perpetuity.

At least, that's the claim made when Dems do that with black voters. I guess it's different if you're on the right. Like everything else, it's only bad when the left does it.
 
Re: Krauthammer: 'Impeachable Offense'

My Sicilian forebears came through Ellis Island in the early part of the last century.
This means they were legal immigrants and not illegal aliens. I do not believe you can discern the difference.

They were dirt poor farmers.
How much welfare did they get?

They weren't illiterate, they could speak Italian, but their reading skills were non existent.
Illiterate means they were unable to read. One hundred years ago when muscle was more important than brains that might not have made a difference. In my opinion it does today.

Even to the day they died both my grandmothers were far more comfortable with Italian than English and that's what we largely spoke around them.
I am not surprised. My wife is a legal immigrant. When we first met she spoke American English reasonably well. She also spoke French and Spanish in addition to her native German. Today she speaks American English better than many native speakers. But not everyone needs to. One hundred years ago when someone emigrated to the US it was with the intention of becoming a US citizen and not to change this nation into something resembling the country they left.

Both of my grandfathers gained US citizenship by serving in the US Army during WWI.
Cool. They were committed.

All that's to say I don't see a whole hell of a lot of difference between the poor coming here today and my family and those who came from Europe with them.
Your grandparents came here legally.
Your grandparents came here with the intention of becoming Americans.
Your grandparents were not sponges.
Your grandparents did not bring diseases with them.
Your grandparents did not plan to change the country into a facsimile of a corrupt Sicily.
Your grandparents were not brought here by a political party to tip the balance for a hundred years toward one party rule.

As to stealing from you there is ample evidence that illegals on balance cost you nothing.
Although it is not your lie it is a lie. On balance they raise my property taxes. On balance we are providing them with food, clothing and shelter in addition to an education and health care. They are already costing me. On balance.

Jobs? If Americans wanted those jobs illegals wouldn't have them.
This is another lie. We have made indolence so rewarding that the welfare recipients won't bother going to work. We can repair our extravagant welfare system and have people return to work.
 
Re: Krauthammer: 'Impeachable Offense'

It's pretty neat racist to assume that an entire ethnic group will vote for one party in perpetuity.

At least, that's the claim made when Dems do that with black voters. I guess it's different if you're on the right. Like everything else, it's only bad when the left does it.

How does your medicine taste?
 
Re: Krauthammer: 'Impeachable Offense'

You go too far. Beyond. And that's oxymoronic as well.

Here is the whole quote, ""Lynch? No. But an execution of the lawbreaker sounds great."
Quote Originally Posted by Wiggen View Post
Ho come on, now. The idea of a lynching sounds really good to you, doesn't it?
"I want him dead. I want the rule of law to be restored. Lynching is more a Democratic party thing. The KKK was the enforcement arm of the democratic party. Intimidation and murder is something those you support do."

What do you object to? With great power comes great responsibilities. Obama has intentionally damaged the nation and may very well commit and unpardonable, treasonous act, against American citizens in the next few weeks. His acts, when taken against the American citizens, the American nation, and the American Constitution, deserve the greatest possible punishment.

Impeach him either way. Convict him and remove him from office. Then arrest him for treason and other crimes. Try him. Convict him. And sentence him. What could you possibly object to?

Are you sure you understand oxymoron?
 
Re: Krauthammer: 'Impeachable Offense'

It's pretty neat racist to assume that an entire ethnic group will vote for one party in perpetuity.
Maybe. That is the calculation the Democrats are making. I agree with their assessment. Most of the illegals come from places with governments that are as corrupt as our has become. Of course they will vote for democrats. Democrats are the party of big government corruption. And that will mark the end of a two party system for a hundred years.

At least, that's the claim made when Dems do that with black voters. I guess it's different if you're on the right. Like everything else, it's only bad when the left does it.
It has been true for 50 years with black voters. That has been damaging as well.
 
Re: Krauthammer: 'Impeachable Offense'


Do you believe a statement that may turn out to be untrue is the same as an intentional lie?

I was an intelligence officer for most of my 20 year career. I was not right all of the time. When I made an assessment that turned out to be wrong do you believe I was lying? When those who trusted my assessments repeated them do you believe they were lying?

Gruber and the democratic party leadership up to and including Obama lied. They knew they were lying. They lied as policy. they lied because they are tyrants. You are not able to see the difference, can you?
 
Re: Krauthammer: 'Impeachable Offense'

Really? Do you have a list? How did Reagan lie to give us Obamacare? When did Reagan provide guns to Mexican drug cartels to discredit American gun ownership and to soften us up for gun confiscation? When did Reagan lie about how his ambassador and three other Americans were murdered while he prepared for a fund raiser?

Oh please: I'm talking about immigration. The rest of your post is just silly nonsense.

That is not what you wrote. You said that Reagan and Bush did the same thing. Did Bush give amnesty to illegal aliens?
Did he have an agreement with the Democrats to secure the border?
 
Back
Top Bottom