• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Federal judge rules against Kansas's gay marriage ban

ernst barkmann said:
you have no clue do you.........the constitution is only about federalism, and restrictions on the federal government concerning rights.

why don't you just post you are not for freedom, rights of people, you are for force on people, dictation of their lifes..........just say it plain ans starlight out........
Click to expand...

Arrogance appears to be intrinsic to 99% of the under 1%ers.
 
ernst barkmann said:
where is the 1% at....in this forum.

since that falls under conservatives.

or have you not figured that out?

no you have not because you still a 15 yr old kid.....
Click to expand...

Under 1%, not 1%.

You wish your insane ideology would resonate with at least 1% of the American population.
 
ernst barkmann said:
you have no clue do you.........the constitution is only about federalism, and restrictions on the federal government concerning rights.

why don't you just post you are not for freedom, rights of people, you are for force on people, dictation of their lifes..........just say it plain and straight out........
Click to expand...

Wow such horrible hyperbole.

Any government no matter how big or small is going to try to violate rights. We see just as much, if not more, violations of rights from state governments as from federal.
 
ernst barkmann said:
kid....please don't embarrass yourself again as you did with you..."POPULATION CAUSES INFLATION" statement.
Click to expand...

The only embarrasment being made is you with your grammar.

Population is one of many natural causes not directly influenced by government that causes inflation. That was all I had to do to debunk your hilarious "GOVERNMENT MAKES 11% INFLATION SO WHY SHOULD WE RAISE WAGES?!?!?!" example.
 
roguenuke said:
Wow such horrible hyperbole.

Any government no matter how big or small is going to try to violate rights. We see just as much, if not more, violations of rights from state governments as from federal.
Click to expand...

no kidding ?......and you want it to continue......because according to you, well that's just government........
 
Luftwaffe said:
The only embarrasment being made is you with your grammar.

Population is one of many natural causes not directly influenced by government that causes inflation. That was all I had to do to debunk your hilarious "GOVERNMENT MAKES 11% INFLATION SO WHY SHOULD WE RAISE WAGES?!?!?!" example.
Click to expand...

oh, then why did you abandon that position later on..
 
ernst barkmann said:
they were state, our people of the u.s. senate were not running, and i would not vote for them anyway.
Click to expand...

And which ones were those?

I'm guessing they weren't against ALL the violations you think they were.
 
ernst barkmann said:
oh, then why did you abandon that position later on..
Click to expand...

Never abandoned anything.

I still believe to this day that at the very least the minimum wage must rise with general inflation.

I still believe and know that population GROWTH is just one of many causes of inflation.
 
ernst barkmann said:
no kidding ?......and you want it to continue......because according to you, well that's just government........
Click to expand...

Lol, some government regulation is always needed. I'm all for cutting down some of our government, but the more people you have, the more people there are to hurt you, not to mention technology and how much people depend on convenience, we have to have some government regulation.

Please tell me what you think exactly I'm for or not, and why.
 
ernst barkmann said:
dude i am not going over my state candidates with you.
Click to expand...

In other words, there isn't a candidate out there that isn't for some violation of rights as you proclaimed. Therefore, you are voting for the government to violate your rights and others. Whether it is the state doing it or the federal government, government still violates your rights.
 
roguenuke said:
Lol, some government regulation is always needed. I'm all for cutting down some of our government, but the more people you have, the more people there are to hurt you, not to mention technology and how much people depend on convenience, we have to have some government regulation.

Please tell me what you think exactly I'm for or not, and why.
Click to expand...

you see, you have no clue about what you are talking about.

regulations are needed to to secure the health and safety of the public, ......that is why we have them.

if i am not endangering the health and safety of the public, or violating rights of the people...........then why should force be used on me?
 
Luftwaffe said:
You flip flop like a pancake.

You literally just said that I abandoned the position. However, now you are saying "yes" with your god-awful grammar.
Click to expand...

kid, you abandoned you population position almost from the beginning, when you ran to the internet to find out what inflation really is.
 
ernst barkmann said:
you see, you have no clue about what you are talking about.

regulations are needed to to secure the health and safety of the public, ......that is why we have them.

if i am not endangering the health and safety of the public, or violating rights of the people...........then why should force be used on me?
Click to expand...

And what force do you think I am for being used against you that doesn't have to do with health, safety, or general welfare of the people?
 
ernst barkmann said:
you see, you have no clue about what you are talking about.

regulations are needed to to secure the health and safety of the public, ......that is why we have them.

if i am not endangering the health and safety of the public, or violating rights of the people...........then why should force be used on me?
Click to expand...

Define health and safety.

Does it just have to be physical or can it also be financial?
 
ernst barkmann said:
kid, you abandoned you population position almost from the beginning, when you ran to the internet to find out what inflation really is.
Click to expand...

Never abandoned it.

You simply lack any understanding of economics because everything is automatically because of the government. Hell, that is your view outside of economics.

I'm sure if your wife divorced you you would start screaming at the government.
 
TheNextEra said:
In other words, there isn't a candidate out there that isn't for some violation of rights as you proclaimed. Therefore, you are voting for the government to violate your rights and others. Whether it is the state doing it or the federal government, government still violates your rights.
Click to expand...

lol...
 
Luftwaffe said:
Never abandoned it.

You simply lack any understanding of economics because everything is automatically because of the government. Hell, that is your view outside of economics.

I'm sure if your wife divorced you you would start screaming at the government.
Click to expand...

a kid, it sure shows.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom