• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Reid on the Ropes

Reid on the Ropes | National Review Online


I've been talking about this sum'bitch for a while now. I think he's over-played his game and is a weak-link in the Democratic Party. For all his years and power, people are getting fed up with his bull****, especially some Democrats. He's been running interference for Obama for six years, and it's probably the reason why Obama got reelected. But his playbook is getting old, and tiresome. He's a ****ing megalomaniac who wants to rule the Senate till 2022!

Kind of reminds you of Pelosi a few years back. How many seats in the house did she cause her party to lose?
 
Kind of reminds you of Pelosi a few years back. How many seats in the house did she cause her party to lose?

That old bag of bones needs to go too; she's a witch.
 
I don't think McConnel is slimier than Reid, however, I don't think much will change with Reid out the majority spot.

I'll sleep better.
 
Getting rid of Reid is one of the worst things that could happen to the GOP of NO.
Running against people and ideas is all the GOP knows,
We'll see how they do with the big-boy shoes on .
 
Getting rid of Reid is one of the worst things that could happen to the GOP of NO.
Running against people and ideas is all the GOP knows,
We'll see how they do with the big-boy shoes on .

Lol.....

Its a little late for left wing talking points Nimby

After a big loss they just come off as sour grapes. Learn to lose gracefully.
 
I get people trying to push their agendas, but just not bringing stuff to the floor for a vote is way over the top. He ought

Reid did that to protect his red state Democrats from having to make a tough decision on how they voted. Many of the House passed bills were popular in red states, bring them up for debate and a vote meant Reid's red state Democrats voted the party line they would peeve off the folks back in their state and that meant they might lose the next election. He placed keeping the majority above the needs of country and the legislative process that is suppose to happen.

What Reid didn't understand is a senator is suppose to first represent the state he is from, not his political party.

Now the question is will Gardner and Ernst represent the folks from Colorado and Iowa or will they fall in line with the Republican agenda while ignoring the folks who just elected them?
 
Lol.....

Its a little late for left wing talking points Nimby

After a big loss they just come off as sour grapes. Learn to lose gracefully.

LOL. And watch how fast the Democrats become the party of NO.

I
 
I know one guy who can see the bright side of last night's results ...
schumer as chucky.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom