• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trending: More college students support post-birth abortion

1750Texan said:
Most Hispanic women understand that the move from 24 weeks to 20 weeks is just a Republican ploy to look like their legislation is effecting abortions.

Of course you and most Hispanic women know that the vast majority of women who decided to terminate their pregnancy do so before 20 weeks.

Of course you know, like most Hispanic women, that if a woman's life or health is in question the 20 week limit is not valid.

Of course you know like most Hispanic women that in the case of rape or incest the 20 week limit is not valid.

Boy you and Hispanic women know a lot.
Click to expand...

I'm not really sure what you are trying to argue, here.... The point was simply that the younger generation is more likely to support restrictions to abortion than expanding it.
 
Slyfox696 said:
I'm not (trust me, right now I wish I was...two days of basketball have left me quite sore). I just sound intelligent. Perhaps you're old and have forgotten the difference? ;)

(Yes, it was a joke)
Click to expand...

You speak well but not wisely. ;)
 
Luftwaffe said:
Jmotivator's like made me thought otherwise, but yeah, smiley picture next time? Internet is toneless.
Click to expand...

These are the incremental realizations that make you wise and can't be bypassed through ideology.
 
j-mac said:
Wow....Isn't the infestation of progressive radicals in positions of education wonderful? And we as parents PAY THEM to infect our kids minds like this.
Click to expand...

Again, political porn.... GIGO / unworthy of discussion as its complete nonsense. I'm not certain the Onion even thought of this one.

Don't you understand how the distortions of political porn lead to a distortion of the reader's reality?
 
SouthernDemocrat said:
As someone that is socially liberal, I remember with our son we were thinking the first 5 years were obviously a trial basis and if it didn't work out we would just take a mulligan and try again.

We adopted our daughters at age 4 and 9, so with the 9 year old we were pretty much stuck with her regardless, but the 4 year old we still had a 1 year trial basis.... You know because that's how us social liberals think. Human life means nothing to us anymore... at least up until age 5.....:roll:
Click to expand...

My mom always told me she was going to take me back to Sears.
 
j-mac said:
Wow....Isn't the infestation of progressive radicals in positions of education wonderful? And we as parents PAY THEM to infect our kids minds like this.
Click to expand...

If someone were to ask me a "serious" question about whether it's okay to kill kids up to age 4-5 because they are not yet self aware, I'd give them the "serious" answer of Hell yes.
 
cpwill said:
I'm not really sure what you are trying to argue, here.... The point was simply that the younger generation is more likely to support restrictions to abortion than expanding it.
Click to expand...

I was hoping to point out the 20 weeks is not a restriction. It in no way restricts a woman's right to have an abortion...I bet Hispanic women got it.
 
cpwill said:
I'm not really sure what you are trying to argue, here.... The point was simply that the younger generation is more likely to support restrictions to abortion than expanding it.
Click to expand...
How does one expand the right to an abortion?
 
Zyphlin said:
I don't know how long many of you have been away from College....

However, I clearly remember times when the over zealous "Constitution Party" at my campus was setting up shop in the student center and harassing every passer by while having pictures of dead fetus's all over the place.

I remember that, in general, most students treated the group with mockery at best and disdain at worst largely due to their tactics, attitude, and the fact people were more concerned with going to grab some food in one of the mess halls or chat about the latest movie or video game in the Student Center rather than having politics shoved down their throats.

There's not a doubt in my mind that if pro-life groups were being irritated ****s to other college students on campus that you'd have a large number of students purposefully and intentionally just ****ing with them by saying outrageous things they know would annoy or piss those people off.

Forgive me if I'm not buying the anecdotal evidence collected by a bunch of college pro-life groups...none of which I've ever ran into that hasn't been amazingly obnoxious...trying to portray the things said to them by a bunch of other college students as some kind of legitimate feeling on behalf of those students and not just the equivilent to trolling.
Click to expand...

Yeah, this.

My first thought after reading the OP was that the pro-life crowed is the easiest in the world to **** with. They were trolled and they didn't even know it. They're so convinced that pro-choicers are morally bankrupt at best and downright genocidal maniacs at worst that they will believe literally anything.
 
Arcana XV said:
Yeah, this.

My first thought after reading the OP was that the pro-life crowed is the easiest in the world to **** with. They were trolled and they didn't even know it. They're so convinced that pro-choicers are morally bankrupt at best and downright genocidal maniacs at worst that they will believe literally anything.
Click to expand...

Gotta disagree.
FAUX News producers/anchors/commentators are the easiest in the world to **** with, but the pro-life crowd is top 5 for sure.
 
A trend seen by prolife activists that frequently engage college students on campuses nationwide is the growing acceptance of post-birth abortion, or killing the infant after he or she is born, campus prolife outreach leaders tell The College Fix.

Anecdotal evidence by leaders of prolife groups such as Created Equal and Survivors of the Abortion Holocaust said in interviews that not only do they see more college students willing to say they support post-birth abortion, but some students even suggest children up to 4 or 5-years-old can also be killed, because they are not yet “self aware.”
“We encounter people who think it is morally acceptable to kill babies after birth on a regular basis at almost every campus we visit,” said Mark Harrington, director of Created Equal. “While this viewpoint is still seen as shocking by most people, it is becoming increasingly popular.”

TRENDING: More college students support post-birth abortion
Click to expand...
j-mac said:
Wow....Isn't the infestation of progressive radicals in positions of education wonderful? And we as parents PAY THEM to infect our kids minds like this.
Click to expand...

Isn't post-birth abortion like murder? Murder of a viable and already born infant?
 
j-mac said:
Wow....Isn't the infestation of progressive radicals in positions of education wonderful? And we as parents PAY THEM to infect our kids minds like this.
Click to expand...

I cannot believe this at all. Although 2 people around the world supporting it going up to 3 is a pretty significant growth and I suppose counts increasing.
 
Up to the age of 18. Children would be so much more respectful to their parents. Well, maybe not the first one, but certainly all their friends.
 
j-mac said:
Wow....Isn't the infestation of progressive radicals in positions of education wonderful? And we as parents PAY THEM to infect our kids minds like this.
Click to expand...

Abortion is termination of pregnancy. There is no such thing as post birth abortion.
 
Slyfox696 said:
So anecdotal evidence from obviously biased sources is what you use as your sources.

Good to know.
Click to expand...

You must be under some self delusion that I need to please you or something...How dumb is that? :doh
 
Jetboogieman said:
j-Mac has always had a forte for posting extremely questionable links.

He once used conservapedia in a thread to support his positions.

But this one takes the cake.

The idea that "anecdotal evidence" supports the notion that progressives are lining up to kill 5 year olds is so outrageous it disqualifies him from any and all intelligent debate in the future.
Click to expand...


hahahaha! As if you were the final determination on something like that...:lamo I take your blather as a complement coming from someone that hasn't been taken seriously for about a decade now....:laughat: Jet
 
j-mac said:
You must be under some self delusion that I need to please you or something...How dumb is that? :doh
Click to expand...
No one said anything about you pleasing me, I have a wife for that. I do appreciate the offer though, it kind of explains things.

Oh, and as friendly advice, only a fool would believe "anecdotal" evidence from obviously biased sources. So here's hoping you won't make that mistake. Have a great day.
 
Reply to the charge of "anecdotal"...

Yes, the article is based on an interview with a group of college activists that use "anecdotal" evidence, IOW, they walk around and talk to other college students and gain their opinions. You know, like when a pollster calls you on the phone, and asks if they can ask you a series of questions...The difference being that it isn't a scientific poll, in that they don't go out and ask lead up questions like 'How old are you?'.... 'Are you white, black, hispanic...etc?'.... 'Do you consider yourself Democrat, Republican, Indy?.... Plus the fact that those progressive liberals in here that are attacking me, and the OP based on that rather than actually discussing the subject have already LOST the debate. They show themselves as either in agreement with this type of Murder, or they don't want any light shed on the disgusting lines of thought that are promoted by their peers on college campuses these days.

All one has to do is read responses like this one from Winchester a few posts back:

Winchester said:
If someone were to ask me a "serious" question about whether it's okay to kill kids up to age 4-5 because they are not yet self aware, I'd give them the "serious" answer of Hell yes.
Click to expand...

This is in my opinion, a mental disorder...The lack of respect for life in general might possibly be traced back to this young man in his early childhood when he tortured and killed defenseless animals, I don't know if that were the case, but with an attitude like this I wouldn't be surprised.

Then you have the first poster to my OP, Slyfox....A misleading screen name designed to make people think on first glance that he is a mature adult, and often posts in inflamatory style, using common methods of snark, and self conceit to project that people must meet his standard of posting anything, which as many know, if it is not in agreement with his progressive ideology, will never happen. Then like a child he resorts to supremely childish retort, baiting, and insult. like this reply to his first post in this thread in which I replied that I don't have to please him, and he says:

Slyfox696 said:
No one said anything about you pleasing me, I have a wife for that. I do appreciate the offer though, it kind of explains things.
Click to expand...

Oh so clever, in a 4th grade kind of way....right folks? :roll: But he goes on:

Oh, and as friendly advice, only a fool would believe "anecdotal" evidence from obviously biased sources. So here's hoping you won't make that mistake. Have a great day.
Click to expand...

In his usual ego driven, passive/aggressive style, he wants to give some "friendly advice"? Hmmmm...Friendly advice from a progressive that can't even tell the truth about that on a public forum...Yeah right....:roll: Then he moves directly into attacking the source, an ad hom fallacy, then back to trying to end the facade with that "friendly advice"....:roll: This is just the usual tactic from people like him, that will at first chance go running off to Mod mommy or daddy after they display the worst of character....So easy, they are.

But, this thread wasn't supposed to be a steaming pile of sniping, and snark, that is just the kneejerk reaction of liberals and progressives when they can not defend or talk about their agenda's that are exposed.

But instead of making this about other posters on here, fore that would just give in to their plan of ****ting all over this thread, I am saddened, and shocked at the people, the real people that would hold such a viewpoint, that it is fine to kill a 5 year old, and even try to call it "abortion".....

I mean think about it people....We all have sons, daughters, nieces, nephews, that we have had the pleasure of knowing, watch grow, play with, and guide, and that would mean that when and if these sons, daughters, nieces, and nephews were 5yrs, old or less, they would be fine going to the kitchen, grabbing a knife, walking back to them, and ending their life, and feel fine about themselves? My God...There are some serious mental issues there.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom