The real truth of the matter is that you'll not be creating very many jobs without both demand and business.
That Hillary doubled down on such a ridiculous assertion that jobs aren't created by business does in fact show her to be pandering. Pandering to the far left, business hating part of the electorate. Like some of those that have posted here and made themselves be known. Something about an oral fixation and business if I recall.
Without a thriving and growing business segment an economy is sure to flounder and fail. Just have to look at what Communist Russia's economic performance.
Without demand, you've got nothing to drive business to invest and expand. So you can't really do without that either. Just look at the lagging demand of any recession, and you can see the downward economic spiral (demand lags, businesses lay off people, more demand lags, more businesses lay off people, lather, rinse, repeat).
The reverse work equally well. Demand increases, businesses invest and grow, creating even more demand, lather, rinse, repeat. And upward economic spiral.
The real pity here is that some some can't come to grips with the fact that both demand and business are required for the upward economic spiral, and pretty much give in to their partisan ideology and ignore that real facts here.
Further, it's also a real pity that some are so pro-union, that they seem to propound the crippling of business in favor of the union so much so that the business would die. I guess they've never come to the realization that the two are co-dependent, and that without one, you won't long have the other; that the Union in fact relies on the business to be there, healthy and profitable, so as to be able to afford union labor.
In both cases, it's a reasonably fair and reasonably equitable balance that it the best of all situations. Tilting too far from that reasonably fair and reasonably equitable balance and one of the parties involved will start to die, and directly affect the other with great detriment.