• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Public University’s Sex Week Includes ‘Negotiating Successful Threesomes’ Event

Because the best way to deal with people who are having non-marital sex is to pretend it's not happening

It's always worked out well in the past so what could possibly go wrong? :shrug:

maybe i should begin another thread on 'repression' and how it affects the way we post
wonder if certain members would be so active within that thread
 
Okay, so between all the "friends with benefits," and "couples" who maybe "hook-up" a couple of times a week and aren't exclusive but still like to think of themselves as being in a "relationship" anyway, how many are actually in "committed relationships" as a sane person would actually recognize the term? :roll:

You've maybe upped your ante to 20% - 30% of the student body, tops.

And that's enough. It's higher than the percentage of people who study Romance Languages, but I don't see you drama-queening over that
 
and why do you find the university to be compelled to only offer instruction which is designed with marriage or monogamy in mind?

Why do you find the university compelled to only offer instruction with one night stands and promiscuity in mind instead?

Again, it'd be one thing if this campus actually had a "marriage week," or something similar. The simple fact of the matter is that they don't, because the freaks and perverts behind this farce don't give a damn about any of that.

They're only here to coach young and impressionable minds on how to get their rocks off, and spread the perverse gospel of "sexual liberation" to the masses in the process.

That is what people are complaining about more than anything else. They aren't "teaching" anything. They are preaching a certain worldview.

Because the best way to deal with people who are having non-marital sex is to pretend it's not happening

It's always worked out well in the past so what could possibly go wrong? :shrug:

Nah, we should tell them that sex is just clean wholesome fun for the whole family, and that they should have as much of it as possible!

You know, because that's worked so well?

Oh... Wait. Nope!

That's how we wound up with AIDs, an STD epidemic claiming more than 110 million victims living in the United States alone, and 30% of all births taking place out of wedlock. :doh

And that's enough. It's higher than the percentage of people who study Romance Languages, but I don't see you drama-queening over that

Romance languages don't kill people, or result in millions of bastard children that our already overburdened welfare system subsequently has to feed and clothe.
 
Last edited:
Why do you find the university compelled to only offer instruction with one night stands and promiscuity in mind instead?
I did not see any instruction that was only for one night stands or promiscuity

I'm pretty sure blow jobs can be given by and to spouses and people in committed relationships

Nah, we should tell them that sex is just clean wholesome fun for the whole family, and that they should have as much of it as possible!

You know, because that's worked so well?

Everyone who is in a family should have sex. Not with each other, but they should not be abstinent their entire lives.

That's how we wound up with AIDs, an STD epidemic claiming more than 110 million victims living in the United States alone, and 30% of all births taking place out of wedlock. :doh

Yeah, people should stop having sex!!

That'll stop the underpopulation problem you're so worried about



Romance languages don't kill people, or result in millions of bastard children that our already overburdened welfare system subsequently has to feed and clothe.

I see you've never tried to learn Latin. It's murder, I tell ya!
 
Last edited:
I did not see any instruction that was only for one night stands or promiscuity

I'm pretty sure blow jobs can be given by and to spouses and people in committed relationships

Again, because this whole thing was clearly set up with less than a third of the campus population in mind, right? That's also obviously why its subject matter most heavily focuses upon teaching students who are already at risk for sexually irresponsible behavior to be more successful at facilitating those kinds of liaisons?

You're a riot! :lamo

Yeah, people should stop having sex!!

That'll stop the underpopulation problem you're so worried about

They should certainly stop having dangerous and irresponsible sex, which overwhelmingly results in poor outcomes for the people involved or underprivileged children which the state later has to care for.
 
Last edited:
I'm 110% against your entire philosophy on this matter. If anything, we need more "frickin' prudes" in this country. We need more people willing to practice legitimate responsibility and disciplined personal restraint. What we most certainly do not need are any more self-absorbed sluts and man-whores desperately rubbing their diseased genitals up against one another like rutting animals in the vain hope of achieving some imaginary vision of "sexual enlightenment" manufactured out of whole cloth by sex obsessed freaks looking for an excuse to "stick it to mommy and daddy."

I'm sorry, but the simple fact of the matter is that the entire history of so called "sexual liberation" in the Western World has already proven your thesis wrong. As "casual" sexuality and discussion of it have become common place, so to have the various diseases and social evils which go along with it. That much isn't even up for debate.

All the Left's after now is an opportunity to finish the job by any means possible. :roll:

Oh well. You are free to be against whatever you wish, but it doesn't mean I'm going to change my mind. I feel I am right, and there is research to back me up.

One example-

Polyamory May Be Good for You | Love & Relationships
 
Again, because this whole thing was clearly set up with less than a third of the campus population in mind, right? That's also obviously why its subject matter most heavily focuses upon teaching students who are already at risk for sexually irresponsible behavior to be more successful at facilitating those kinds of liaisons?

You're a riot! :lamo



They should certainly stop having dangerous and irresponsible sex, which overwhelmingly results in poor outcomes for the people involved or underprivileged children which the state later has to care for.
because being informed is so much more likely going to cause the students to have negative sexual outcomes
sarcasm.gif
too bad the college of charleston is not offering similar courses, so that some of its more naive residents could attend and learn something about this topic
 
First off, even going by your own stats, 93% of college students aren't married.

Secondly, as of 2014, only 25% of the Millennial generation - roughly half of which is now post-grad, and well into its late 20s and early 30s, BTW - is married.

Yea... Nice try, bud. :lol:

Again, the simple fact of the matter is that absolutely no part of this so called "sex week" was designed with marriage or monogamy in mind.

Healthy relationships don't have to include marriage, not legal marriage. Maybe they have bonds that are just as strong as marriage but don't want to legally marry. And so what if they aren't monogamous? So long as they agree to it, that is their choice and you can't prove that every poly relationship is bad or harmful or worse than if they were in monogamous relationships.
 
First off, even going by your own stats, 93% of college students aren't married.

Secondly, as of 2014, only 25% of the Millennial generation - roughly half of which is now post-grad, and well into its late 20s and early 30s, BTW - is married.

Yea... Nice try, bud. :lol:

Again, the simple fact of the matter is that absolutely no part of this so called "sex week" was designed with marriage or monogamy in mind.

So what? It wasn't designed with wood carving in mind either. You're, what, 26 right? Did you go to college? Didn't you try to have sex in college?
 
Because teaching how to give head is just like teaching how to cook Jews

It was all just a misunderstanding

edit: not the correct video...

How-to-Cook-Humans.jpg
 
Last edited:
Okay, so between all the "friends with benefits," and "couples" who maybe "hook-up" a couple of times a week and aren't exclusive but still like to think of themselves as being in a "relationship" anyway, how many are actually in "committed relationships" as a sane person would recognize the term? :roll:

You've maybe upped your ante to 20% - 30% of the student body, tops.

A 20% or 30%, I might add, who are probably most likely to be more Conservative-minded students like myself, who were complaining about this whole fiasco in the first place, rather than the "sex positive" sodomites most eager to attend. :lol:

If some old pervert wants to attend sex classes with a bunch of 20 year olds, they are more than welcome to do so off campus. :lol:

It doesn't matter if they are friends with benefits or hookups, or in relationships that won't go anywhere. Building these relationships into healthy relationships is still a good thing. They may ultimately end, but they may just end without a whole lot of negative results that they might have otherwise faced without someone teaching them about safe sex, healthy sexual communication, and even just what healthy relationships are about. Maybe it helps someone recognize they aren't in a healthy relationship and need to get out of it.
 
Oh well. You are free to be against whatever you wish, but it doesn't mean I'm going to change my mind. I feel I am right, and there is research to back me up.

One example-

Polyamory May Be Good for You | Love & Relationships

because being informed is so much more likely going to cause the students to have negative sexual outcomes
View attachment 67173856
too bad the college of charleston is not offering similar courses, so that some of its more naive residents could attend and learn something about this topic

Healthy relationships don't have to include marriage, not legal marriage. Maybe they have bonds that are just as strong as marriage but don't want to legally marry. And so what if they aren't monogamous? So long as they agree to it, that is their choice and you can't prove that every poly relationship is bad or harmful or worse than if they were in monogamous relationships.

It doesn't matter if they are friends with benefits or hookups, or in relationships that won't go anywhere. Building these relationships into healthy relationships is still a good thing. They may ultimately end, but they may just end without a whole lot of negative results that they might have otherwise faced without someone teaching them about safe sex, healthy sexual communication, and even just what healthy relationships are about. Maybe it helps someone recognize they aren't in a healthy relationship and need to get out of it.

:lol:

So... Again, appeals to emotion and other nonsense aside, the fact of the matter remains that this whole farce doesn't have a damn thing to do with teaching "safe sex" or "responsible" behavior. At the end of the day, it's all about spreading the socio-cultural Left's insane version of "free love" ideology regardless of whether people actually want it or not, because you guys feel like proselytizing perversion.

What's next, "fetish week," replete with "BDSM Sex Club Etiquette 101?" :roll:

"These kids paid 100,000 dollars for this, damnit! If they don't at least wind up with the clap and a homicidal stalker of an ex by the time they leave, we'll have failed them as educators!"

So what? It wasn't designed with wood carving in mind either. You're, what, 26 right? Did you go to college? Didn't you try to have sex in college?

No. Not, really.

I don't do so today either.
 
Last edited:
:lol:

So... Again, appeals to emotion and other nonsense aside, the fact of the matter remains that this whole farce doesn't have a damn thing to do with teaching "safe sex" or "responsible" behavior. At the end of the day, it's all about spreading the socio-cultural Left's insane "free love" ideology regardless of whether people actually want it or not, because you guys feel like proselytizing perversion.

What's next, "fetish week," replete with "BDSM Sex Club Etiquette 101?" :roll:

"These kids paid 100,000 dollars for this, damnit! If they don't at least wind up with the clap and a homicidal stalker of an ex by the time they leave, we'll have failed them as educators!"

No. Not, really.

I don't do so today either.

It has to do with teaching a lot of things including safe sex and building healthy sexual relationships and stronger sexual self esteems.

That last line toward my post though shows which of us is using the appeal to emotions here, along with a bunch of hyperbolic nonsense.
 
It has to do with teaching a lot of things including safe sex and building healthy sexual relationships and stronger sexual self esteems.

That last line toward my post though shows which of us is using the appeal to emotions here, along with a bunch of hyperbolic nonsense.

Blah, blah, blah...

Again, "safe sex and building healthy sexual relationships" =/= "How to get laid" and "How to negotiate a threesome."

Lie to yourself all you want. They are, quite frankly, almost completely opposite concepts.
 
So... Again, appeals to emotion and other nonsense aside...

"These kids paid 100,000 dollars for this, damnit! If they don't at least wind up with the clap and a homicidal stalker of an ex by the time they leave, we'll have failed them as educators!"


:roll:

Compares teaching about blow jobs to cooking Jews

Complains about appeals to emotion and other nonsense
 
:roll:

Compares teaching about blow jobs to cooking Jews

Complains about appeals to emotion and other nonsense

You'll have to take that one up with Notquiteright. It was his comparison, not mine.
 
Last edited:
No, it was yours

No, it was not.

He asked if I would be opposed to a "Holocaust History Week."

I said that I certainly would be... If that history was taught in a positive pro-Nazi context, and included instructional courses on their methods, just as this "sex week" clearly aims to do with promiscuous and sexually risky behaviors on college campuses.
 
No, it was not.

He asked if I would be opposed to a "Holocaust History Week."

I said that I certainly would be... If that history was taught in a positive pro-Nazi context, and included instructional courses on their methods, just as this "sex week" clearly aims to do with promiscuous and sexually risky behaviors on college campuses.

Right! That's where you compared teaching about blow jobs to teaching how to cook Jews.
 
No, it was not.

He asked if I would be opposed to a "Holocaust History Week."

I said that I certainly would be... If that history was taught in a positive pro-Nazi context, and included instructional courses on their methods, just as this "sex week" clearly aims to do with promiscuous and sexually risky behaviors on college campuses.

post #163
Are they going to give out free Swastika armbands and include courses with titles like "How to search prisoners for hidden valuables," or "How to cook Jews without being a Nazi?"



Like the Pope hiding Jews at Vatican, and Catholic priests publicly opposed to Hitler's regime dying in Nazi concentration camps right along side them?

Pope Pius XII and the Holocaust

Top Vatican official: Documents show Pius XII worked to help Jews
 
Blah, blah, blah...

Again, "safe sex and building healthy sexual relationships" =/= "How to get laid" and "How to negotiate a threesome."

Lie to yourself all you want. They are, quite frankly, almost completely opposite concepts.

Except for the fact that the seminars themselves do teach those things, no matter what you want to believe is being taught based on the title of the seminars.
 
Right! That's where you compared teaching about blow jobs to teaching how to cook Jews.

post #163

Yes. I corrected his comparison to be more in line with what the university is actually doing here.

They aren't teaching "safe" or "responsible" sex. They are teaching their students how to be successful at being promiscuous.

That's like hosting a Holocaust week that teaches the finer points of being a concentration camp guard.
 
Complains about appeals to emotion and other nonsense

Posts this:

They aren't teaching "safe" or "responsible" sex. They are teaching their students how to be successful at being promiscuous.

That's like hosting a Holocaust week that teaches the finer points of being a concentration camp guard.
 
Except for the fact that the seminars themselves do teach those things, no matter what you want to believe is being taught based on the title of the seminars.

Right... Are they going to teach them how to put a condom on a banana right before telling about how absolutely amazing it is go and try to take home drunk strangers from bars and clubs? :roll:

Again, the simple fact of the matter is that, progressive delusion aside, there is nothing "safe" or "responsible" about promiscuous behavior.

It is, at best, a vice, and a dangerous one at that. As such, it is no more an institution of higher learning's place to host classes instructing students in its methods, than it would be to teach similar classes on binge drinking or recreational drug usage.

It is simply a waste of the student body's time (and possibly worse, if it serves to actively encourage them to go out and make bad sexual decisions), and it is waste of the school's money.

Complains about appeals to emotion and other nonsense

Posts this:

I would suggest that certain posters not make misleading analogies, if they do not wish for them to be corrected. :lol:
 
Last edited:
Right... Are they going to teach them how to put a condom on a banana right before telling about how absolutely amazing it is go and try to take home drunk strangers from bars and clubs? :roll:

Again, the simple fact of the matter is that, progressive delusion aside, there is nothing "safe" or "responsible" about promiscuous behavior.

It is, at best, a vice, and a dangerous one at that. As such, it is no more an institution of higher learning's place to host classes instructing students in its methods, than it would be to teach a class on binge drinking or recreational drug usage.

It is simply a waste of the student body's time (and possibly worse, if it serves to actively encourage them to go out and make bad sexual decisions), and it is waste of the school's money.

I would suggest that certain posters not make misleading analogies, if they do not wish for them to be corrected. :lol:

Where did you get that they were going to teach "how absolutely amazing it is <to> go and try to take home drunk strangers from bars and clubs"? Nothing in those titles said that. Not everyone at a bar or club is drunk or a stranger.

The fact of the matter is that you don't know what really is safe or responsible sex, only what you want to believe is "safe and responsible sex".

It is in no way a waste of time to teach students how to develop healthier sexual relationships, even if they had absolutely nothing in there about practicing safe sex.
 
Back
Top Bottom