• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Public University’s Sex Week Includes ‘Negotiating Successful Threesomes’ Event

No, that wasn't quite my point. The university is compartmentalized from the rest of society.

And if the campus were to officially host a "hate week," where they allowed the KKK, radical Islamists, and the more radically anti-homosexual elements of the Christian right to speak on campus for all students?

How would you feel about that?

The fact that such a thing would be next to unthinkable speaks volumes about the agenda at play here.
 
I feel the same way about conservatism, frankly.

That being said, the university is a place where these sessions can largely roam free.

Yeah, sure you do. Stop ****ing making **** up! You never in your life believed that conservatives promote promiscuity.
 
They are literally hosting classes teaching men how to pick up strange at bars, while - quite paradoxically - still being "gentlemen."

Should we start hosting classes on how to get away with murder at prisons as well?

The schools pro-life org is taking part in that
Patterson, for her part, said she and her group planned to set up a table at Monday night’s “How to be a Gentleman and Still Get Laid” campus event, led by Mihalko.

“The biggest act of being gentleman is accepting fatherhood,” she said. “We are going to be there and have a presence. We are not protesting or anything like that, we want people to know there are responsible people on campus who will help them.”
 
The fact of the matter remains that they are deliberately going out of their way to not only condone promiscuous and sexually irresponsible behavior, but instruct their student body in how to pursue it.

They are supporting bad behavior.

Dude... chill the **** out.

The fact of the matter is I am somewhat inclined to agree with you because I'm not the biggest fan of promiscuity, but the fact of the matter is it's none of my business.

and being promiscuous doesn't necessarily mean one is irresponsible if they practice safe sex.
 
Yeah, sure you do. Stop ****ing making **** up! You never in your life believed that conservatives promote promiscuity.

Sure I do. I see it all the time out in the real world. Male sexual conquest and titillation for many conservatives isn't nearly as big of a deal as it is when it's the women trying to do it. When liberals come across that knowledge, they often proclaim that it's just hypocrisy and we all need to be more open and yadda yadda. I'm of the opinion that outside the university, where certain amounts of debauchery can be accepted and moved on in four-six years, ought to be quashed when they remove themselves from it. Conservative men just aren't holding themselves to anywhere near the same standard they do women. I encourage them to do more, rather than less.
 
None of this will increase the chances of a less attractive man getting laid. Until that happens, not impressed.

you don't know
guys with power - and limited looks - get laid
to many women, power/influence/authority/fame is an aphrodisiac

it is more men who equate looks with sexual desirability

and yes, i admit to have engaged in more than a bit of stereotyping in this assessment
 
Dude... chill the **** out.

The fact of the matter is I am somewhat inclined to agree with you because I'm not the biggest fan of promiscuity, but the fact of the matter is it's none of my business.

and being promiscuous doesn't necessarily mean one is irresponsible if they practice safe sex.

Promiscuity is "irresponsible sexual behavior" on an intrinsic level. No amount of "safe sex" is going to change that.

Again, my major issue here is simply that the school is making such a deliberate point of trying to market these kinds of life styles to their student body. If this were some minor, private, event, I would have no issue.

The institution as a whole is basically pushing a certain agenda, and not even trying to be subtle about it.
 
It's making the argument that getting "laid" is the ultimate concern. A proper gentleman would not succumb to that orientation. Even the term is beneath them.

Got it and I agree with your point. However reality is college kids do want to get laid and there's probably value in pointing out that you don't have to be a Neanderthal about it.
 
you don't know
guys with power - and limited looks - get laid
to many women, power/influence/authority/fame is an aphrodisiac

it is more men who equate looks with sexual desirability

Yes, a man who is less attractive because they don't have power influence authority or fame.
 
Who says modern "Liberal" culture doesn't encourage promiscuity and irresponsible sexual behavior among youth demographics, amirite? :roll:

Actually those classes teach RESPONSIBLE sexual behavior not irresponsible and I will take those classes over a conservative "Put an asprin between your knees" or "Abstinence" method.

Conservatives would rather a women not know anything and then get pregnant or an STD later.
 
There is nothing "compartmentalized" about this. This is clearly meant to be an event catering to the student body as a whole, which carries "official" sanction with it.

It'd be one thing if the University had a "sex club" somewhere on campus. This is something different entirely.

They are basically going out of their way to market sexually promiscuous lifestyles to their student body.



The fact of the matter remains that they are deliberately going out of their way to not only condone promiscuous and sexually irresponsible behavior, but instruct their student body in how to pursue it.

They are supporting bad behavior.

please point out the "bad" behavior and explain what is found "bad" about it
what you are exposing us to is the result of years of repression
 
Sure I do. I see it all the time out in the real world. Male sexual conquest and titillation for many conservatives isn't nearly as big of a deal as it is when it's the women trying to do it. When liberals come across that knowledge, they often proclaim that it's just hypocrisy and we all need to be more open and yadda yadda. I'm of the opinion that outside the university, where certain amounts of debauchery can be accepted and moved on in four-six years, ought to be quashed when they remove themselves from it. Conservative men just aren't holding themselves to anywhere near the same standard they do women. I encourage them to do more, rather than less.

Conservatives are not promoting it.
 
Promiscuity is "irresponsible sexual behavior" on an intrinsic level.

It is not.

Your judgmental worldview makes you believe it is.

Very personally I'm inclined to agree, but then again that would also make me a hypocrite because

A) I have slept with many more women than what is said to be the average.

B) I have no right in the public sphere to be judgmental about that kind of thing because it's a personal choice as long as both participants are consenting.

It happened, it's happening and it will continue to happen.
 
I dunno... The best sex I've ever had has always been with a woman that I actually truly love, or loved. Casual sex never seems to reach the same level of intimacy that I and some other men crave. Once you've had that "feeling" during sex with someone you love, you tend NOT to settle for anything less.


Tim-
 
And if the campus were to officially host a "hate week," where they allowed the KKK, radical Islamists, and the more radically anti-homosexual elements of the Christian right to speak on campus for all students?

How would you feel about that?

The fact that such a thing would be next to unthinkable speaks volumes about the agenda at play here.

Meh, you righties are way too uptight about sex. Lighten up. get some.
 
Conservatives are not promoting it.

Please, if we want to see the blinding sexual promiscuity, it's right in Erod's post. The sanctity of his "daughters" is at stake.
 
Actually those classes teach RESPONSIBLE sexual behavior not irresponsible and I will take those classes over a conservative "Put an asprin between your knees" or "Abstinence" method.

Conservatives would rather a women not know anything and then get pregnant or an STD later.

Glorification of promiscuity is in no way, shape, or form "responsible."

please point out the "bad" behavior and explain what is found "bad" about it
what you are exposing us to is the result of years of repression

It is not.

Your judgmental worldview makes you believe it is.

STD infection chance, chances of unwanted pregnancy, and even a woman's odds of being raped or sexually assaulted all drastically increase with promiscuous behavior.

Again, I'm sorry, but there is absolutely nothing "responsible" about it. At best, it is a foolish behavior that people sometimes are able to get away with, like binge drinking or drunk driving.

Very personally I'm inclined to agree, but then again that would also make me a hypocrite because

A) I have slept with many more women than what is said to be the average.

B) I have no right in the public sphere to be judgmental about that kind of thing because it's a personal choice as long as both participants are consenting.

It happened, it's happening and it will continue to happen.

It doesn't matter what people do or do not do in their spare time. That's not the issue.

The issue is whether or not a public institution should be going out of its way to encourage that kind of behavior.

If I'd spent good money to send me children to this university, just so they could teach them "slut tactics 101," I'd be furious.
 
And if the campus were to officially host a "hate week," where they allowed the KKK, radical Islamists, and the more radically anti-homosexual elements of the Christian right to speak on campus for all students?

How would you feel about that?

The fact that such a thing would be next to unthinkable speaks volumes about the agenda at play here.

Well, we have had the some of the more anti-homosexual elements of the Christian right on campus before, and it was a point in which righteous undergrads could confront the pastor about it. It was all show. That being said, there is a distincton between violence, which is usually against school policy, and sex.
 
STD infection chance, chances of unwanted pregnancy, and even a woman's odds of being raped or sexually assaulted all drastically increase with promiscuous behavior.

Again, I'm sorry, but there is absolutely nothing "responsible" about it. At best, it is a foolish behavior that people sometimes are able to get away with, like binge drinking or drunk driving.

I'm sorry I take big issue with this, that's some real high horse nonsense.

If both parties are consenting then what right do you have to say what you're saying.

You can't stop it, it's reality and will continue to be so, so the best thing to do is encourage safe sex and leave it at that.

Unless you're planning on restricting peoples movements you're not gonna have a good chance at discouraging casual sex.

It doesn't matter what people do or do not do in their spare time. That's not the issue.

The issue is whether or not a public institution should be going out of its way to encourage that kind of behavior.

If I'd spent good money to send me children to this university, just so they could teach them "slut tactics 101," I'd be furious.

I do also question the wisdom of such classes, but whatever man, seriously, it's one institution.

By that point your daughters an adult and can make her own choices.

18-24 year olds definitely don't need any encouragement to wanna **** eachother.
 
Back
Top Bottom