• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

ISIL Beheads American Photojournalist in Iraq

It seems like the theme again and again is we just need to get more brutal, bomb their mosques when they hide in them, carpet bomb them and so on…. The Soviets did all of this and much more back in the 80s in Afghanistan. It still didn't work. We could firebomb them, kill everyone in their village when one of them turns to extremism, bomb their mosques, hell even mutilate their corpses and bury them in pig guts, and in the end we will be in the same situation the Soviets were in at the end of the 80s in Afghanistan. All we can do over there is contain them, prop-up brutal dictators that are somewhat friendly to the west and contain them, that is all we can do. This fiasco is the direct result of going into Iraq in the first place. Maybe in another thousand years or so they will catch up to the rest of the world.


But the Soviets didn't hunt them.....not in the night, in the dark and when they fear most.
 
No. If you strip these barbarians of their humanity (as they do others), what does this make you?

There are suggestions that the executioner in the video (or at least the voiceover) had a British accent. A Westerner did this.
 
Did anyone really expect anything better, a civil conversation perhaps? When will we learn that certain members of society can't be reasoned with?
 
It is pointless to go after the terrorists themselves. They don't care about their own lives. We need to start eliminating the villages they come from. Yes, entire populations. It is not a matter of "sinking to their level", it is a matter of extermination of a dangerous parasite. The message needs to be clear: This ideology will not be tolerated by the rest of the world. Killing a few men in masks will not make it stop. They need to be allowed to see their entire families wiped from the earth. Of course the pacifists will claim it is over reaction, possible throw in a right wing war monger comment or two, possibly even declare it a religious war. It is none of these things. It is eradicating a disease that is not affected by reason.
 
It is pointless to go after the terrorists themselves. They don't care about their own lives. We need to start eliminating the villages they come from. Yes, entire populations. It is not a matter of "sinking to their level", it is a matter of extermination of a dangerous parasite. The message needs to be clear: This ideology will not be tolerated by the rest of the world. Killing a few men in masks will not make it stop. They need to be allowed to see their entire families wiped from the earth. Of course the pacifists will claim it is over reaction, possible throw in a right wing war monger comment or two, possibly even declare it a religious war. It is none of these things. It is eradicating a disease that is not affected by reason.

Exactly Tech. :2wave: .....diseased animals cannot be allowed to roam with the rest of the Flock.
 
But the Soviets didn't hunt them.....not in the night, in the dark and when they fear most.

I am assuming you are being tongue-in-cheek with that. The Soviets were as brutal as you could get.
 
I am assuming you are being tongue-in-cheek with that. The Soviets were as brutal as you could get.

I didn't say they(Soviets) weren't brutal.....I said they didn't hunt them in the night, in the dark.

So they really never tried to make their enemy fear their worst.
 
I didn't say they(Soviets) weren't brutal.....I said they didn't hunt them in the night, in the dark.

So they really never tried to make their enemy fear their worst.

Right... I am sure that the Soviets only fought them during the daylight hours. At the end of daylight savings time the Islamists could sleep in an hour knowing they were safe in their beds until sunup....
 
It is pointless to go after the terrorists themselves. They don't care about their own lives. We need to start eliminating the villages they come from. Yes, entire populations. It is not a matter of "sinking to their level", it is a matter of extermination of a dangerous parasite. The message needs to be clear: This ideology will not be tolerated by the rest of the world. Killing a few men in masks will not make it stop. They need to be allowed to see their entire families wiped from the earth. Of course the pacifists will claim it is over reaction, possible throw in a right wing war monger comment or two, possibly even declare it a religious war. It is none of these things. It is eradicating a disease that is not affected by reason.

Sure, just go back to Old Testament tactics. That is why there was so much peace in the world back then....:roll:

The problem is going in there in the first place. Had we left the dictator Saddam in power, he would still be contained and none of this would have ever happened.
 
It is pointless to go after the terrorists themselves. They don't care about their own lives. We need to start eliminating the villages they come from. Yes, entire populations. It is not a matter of "sinking to their level", it is a matter of extermination of a dangerous parasite. The message needs to be clear: This ideology will not be tolerated by the rest of the world. Killing a few men in masks will not make it stop. They need to be allowed to see their entire families wiped from the earth. Of course the pacifists will claim it is over reaction, possible throw in a right wing war monger comment or two, possibly even declare it a religious war. It is none of these things. It is eradicating a disease that is not affected by reason.


That really makes us no better than them if we were to allow that to happen and it will only spark more anger against us, needing then to kill more families and innocent people. Call me a pacifist all you want but atleast I don't sink to their level.
 
I think the Terrorists need to be forced to face their worse fears.....its a shame we cant march out 100 of them and Publically show the Terrorists for every one American they kill.....we will kill a hundred of them. In the worse way.....and let them see what we do to the corpses so they know they can't even believe in their religion. That no matter how or what they believe. They wont be making the journey they dreamed of.

I don't know about that but these people do need to be kill for the good of every one else
 
^

So NOW can we indiscriminately drop the bombs everywhere (and I'm being serious too, people need to do something or stop complaining)?

discriminately drop the bombs please
 
Right... I am sure that the Soviets only fought them during the daylight hours. At the end of daylight savings time the Islamists could sleep in an hour knowing they were safe in their beds until sunup....

Well, there is a couple of documentaries on it and they do have some movies based on True Stories. They had battles in the night. But the Soviets didn't go hunting them.

Which is the difference.
 
It is pointless to go after the terrorists themselves. They don't care about their own lives. We need to start eliminating the villages they come from. Yes, entire populations. It is not a matter of "sinking to their level", it is a matter of extermination of a dangerous parasite. The message needs to be clear: This ideology will not be tolerated by the rest of the world. Killing a few men in masks will not make it stop. They need to be allowed to see their entire families wiped from the earth. Of course the pacifists will claim it is over reaction, possible throw in a right wing war monger comment or two, possibly even declare it a religious war. It is none of these things. It is eradicating a disease that is not affected by reason.

no I say we kill you before doing something like that
 
Well, there is a couple of documentaries on it and they do have some movies based on True Stories. They had battles in the night. But the Soviets didn't go hunting them.

Which is the difference.

The Soviets would go out, kill them, then bury them in pig guts as an insult. In response, the Islamists would kidnap Soviet soldiers, mutilate them to look like pigs, and send them back. The Soviets killed as many as 90,000 Mujahedeen, and by some estimates 1.5 million Afghans, yet after 10 years they were no closer to winning the war against Islamists there than they were the day they went in.
 
discriminately drop the bombs please

What's the point, these groups force kids from everywhere to become soldiers. We just need to find wherever ISIS is and then carpet bomb the area.
 
The Soviets would go out, kill them, then bury them in pig guts as an insult. In response, the Islamists would kidnap Soviet soldiers, mutilate them to look like pigs, and send them back. The Soviets killed as many as 90,000 Mujahedeen, and by some estimates 1.5 million Afghans, yet after 10 years they were no closer to winning the war against Islamists there than they were the day they went in.

Yeah but we have nothing to lose from just constant bombing. No soldier is in danger, terrorists die, companies make money and pay taxes for producing the bombs.

We need something to justify our terribly bloated military budgets anyway.
 
The Soviets would go out, kill them, then bury them in pig guts as an insult. In response, the Islamists would kidnap Soviet soldiers, mutilate them to look like pigs, and send them back. The Soviets killed as many as 90,000 Mujahedeen, and by some estimates 1.5 million Afghans, yet after 10 years they were no closer to winning the war against Islamists there than they were the day they went in.


The difference was they weren't just fighting terrorists in Afghanistan. So they couldn't go and just kill wholesale slaughter. Or hunt them down to extinction.
 
I knew that post would get some negative response. But it is not animal cruelty to kill a bear that is attacking you. This started by them killing people who would not convert to their religion. Thinking that they would be peaceful if they are just left alone is delusional. the ideology they have can not be corrected. I would go so far as to say if everyone converted to Islam they would still find a reason to brutally execute people. I have no interest in killing people for the sake of anything, unfortunately in this case it is the only viable alternative. they will continue to kill until they are unable to, and their numbers are growing. All you have to do to understand what has to happen is to do the math. You can be morally superior if you want to be right up to the minute you are killed and then it won't matter.
 
What's the point, these groups force kids from everywhere to become soldiers. We just need to find wherever ISIS is and then carpet bomb the area.

not murdering the innocent
 
The difference was they weren't just fighting terrorists in Afghanistan. So they couldn't go and just kill wholesale slaughter. Or hunt them down to extinction.

Fighting terrorism and extremism was their stated reason for being there.
 
Yeah but we have nothing to lose from just constant bombing. No soldier is in danger, terrorists die, companies make money and pay taxes for producing the bombs.

We need something to justify our terribly bloated military budgets anyway.

Yeah nothing to lose other than when you blow up villages you only create more extremists. Death and destruction is like fertilizer for Islamic Extremism. For example, if you kill a baker's wife and kids while bombing some village over there, all you have done is turn that baker into a terrorist.
 
Who then get forcefully trained and become the guilty.

all for killing their trainers and then any one who has become guilty but till then no
 
Back
Top Bottom