• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

20 U.S. companies that paid 0% in taxes

The government is responsible for this. If they would back off the corps and go after the poor that never pay their bills and just collect welfare we would be much better off. Poor people don't offer jobs,they just avoid them.
 
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/the-insane-u-s--corporate-tax-system-145353359.html

"Merck, the second largest pharmaceutical company in the U.S., actually had a negative effective tax rate of 7.5% during the second quarter, which means it got a tax credit. Eight of the 20 companies were in real estate or real estate-related businesses."

Looks like the "job creator's" are overtaxed.

Did you notice GM was near the top of the list, remember all those lost tax payer dollars that went in to bail them out at Obama's directive.
 
The republicans refuse to reform the tax code. Grover Norqhuist is more important than their constituents.

Where do you come up with this BS, then you quote Grover.

About Grover

Grover Norquist (Twitter: @GroverNorquist) is president of Americans for Tax Reform (ATR), a taxpayer advocacy group he founded in 1985 at President Reagan’s request. ATR works to limit the size and cost of government and opposes higher taxes at the federal, state, and local levels and supports tax reform that moves towards taxing consumed income one time at one rate. ATR organizes the Taxpayer Protection Pledge, which asks all candidates for federal and state office to commit themselves in writing to the American people to oppose all tax increases. In the 113th Congress, 219 House members and 41 Senators have taken the pledge. On the state level, 14 governors and 1,035 state legislators have taken the pledge.

Read more: About Grover | Americans for Tax Reform
 
PAID NO TAXES IN THE 2ND QUARTER

i havent read the entire thread, but did anyone catch that?

did they bother to find out which ones of the 20 paid no taxes for a YEAR?

i paid zero taxes in the 2nd quarter.....my 1st quarter estimate plus credit from 2013, says i owed nothing as of June 30th

That doesnt mean my taxes will be zero for the year

geesh....cmon people

Companies have good quarters/bad quarters

They make estimations based upon annual predictions

So those twenty didnt owe anything for a quarter

BFD!

Now...if you can prove to me that all 20 paid zero taxes in 2013, maybe we can have a conversation
 
PAID NO TAXES IN THE 2ND QUARTER

i havent read the entire thread, but did anyone catch that?

did they bother to find out which ones of the 20 paid no taxes for a YEAR?

i paid zero taxes in the 2nd quarter.....my 1st quarter estimate plus credit from 2013, says i owed nothing as of June 30th

That doesnt mean my taxes will be zero for the year

geesh....cmon people

Companies have good quarters/bad quarters

They make estimations based upon annual predictions

So those twenty didnt owe anything for a quarter

BFD!

Now...if you can prove to me that all 20 paid zero taxes in 2013, maybe we can have a conversation

Despite widespread groans about the recent disclosure that Apple is finding ways to cut its federal tax bill, an analysis shows the computer giant is one of scores of corporations largely dodging the taxman.

A surprising number of companies in the Standard & Poor's 500, 57, have found ways to pay effective tax rates of zero, according to a USA TODAY analysis of data from S&P Capital IQ.

Corporate giants such as telecom firm Verizon, drugmaker Bristol-Myers Squibb and power management firm Eaton, all reported effective tax rates of 0% during the past 12 months. The findings underscore that while many companies bellyache about the top federal income tax rate of 35%, in reality, many pay much less than that, says Nick Yee of Gradient Analytics. "Investors hope company management is doing everything they can to generate profit, legally," he says. "But the tax code is gray, and there's often no set guidance."


http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2013/10/23/big-companies-pay-no-taxes/2480281/
 
Despite widespread groans about the recent disclosure that Apple is finding ways to cut its federal tax bill, an analysis shows the computer giant is one of scores of corporations largely dodging the taxman.

A surprising number of companies in the Standard & Poor's 500, 57, have found ways to pay effective tax rates of zero, according to a USA TODAY analysis of data from S&P Capital IQ.

Corporate giants such as telecom firm Verizon, drugmaker Bristol-Myers Squibb and power management firm Eaton, all reported effective tax rates of 0% during the past 12 months. The findings underscore that while many companies bellyache about the top federal income tax rate of 35%, in reality, many pay much less than that, says Nick Yee of Gradient Analytics. "Investors hope company management is doing everything they can to generate profit, legally," he says. "But the tax code is gray, and there's often no set guidance."


Large companies find ways to a zero tax rate


Verizon 2013 annual report p18 of their report
5.730
19.6% effective tax rate


Eaton annual report online version (page 29)
Year ended December 31 2013 2012 2011
(In millions except for per share data)
Net sales $ 22,046 $ 16,311 $ 16,049
Cost of products sold 15,369 11,448 11,261
Selling and administrative expense 3,886 2,894 2,738
Research and development expense 644 439 417
Interest expense - net 271 208 118
Other (income) expense - net (8) 71 (38)
Income before income taxes 1,884 1,251 1,553
Income tax expense 11 31 201
Net income 1,873 1,220 1,352
Less net income for noncontrolling interests (12) (3) (2)
Net income attributable to Eaton ordinary shareholders $ 1,861 $ 1,217 $ 1,350
Net income per ordinary share
Diluted $ 3.90 $ 3.46 $ 3.93
Basic 3.93 3.54 3.98
Weighted-average number of ordinary shares outstanding
Diluted 476.7 350.9 342.8
Basic 473.5 347.8 338.3
Cash dividends declared per ordinary share $ 1.68 $ 1.52 $ 1.36


Bristol-Myers Squibb
18
Historically, the effective income tax rate is lower than the U.S. statutory rate of 35% due to our decision to indefinitely reinvest the
earnings for certain of our manufacturing operations in Ireland and Puerto Rico. We have favorable tax rates in Ireland and Puerto Rico
under grants not scheduled to expire prior to 2023.

Noncontrolling Interest
See “Note 3 Alliances” for a discussion of our Plavix and Avapro/Avalide partnerships with Sanofi for the territory covering the Americas.
The decrease in noncontrolling interest in both periods resulted from the exclusivity loss in the U.S. of Plavix in May 2012 and Avapro/
Avalide in March 2012. A summary of noncontrolling interest is as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
Dollars in Millions 2013 2012 2011
Sanofi partnerships $ 36 $ 844 $ 2,323
Other 1 14 20
Noncontrolling interest-pre-tax 37 858 2,343
Income taxes (20) (317) (792)
Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interest-net of taxes $ 17 $ 541 $ 1,551


so the only 1 of the 3 that didnt pay taxes was Bristol....and right in their shareholder report they explain why
it helps when you use facts
 
Verizon 2013 annual report p18 of their report
5.730
19.6% effective tax rate


Eaton annual report online version (page 29)
Year ended December 31 2013 2012 2011
(In millions except for per share data)
Net sales $ 22,046 $ 16,311 $ 16,049
Cost of products sold 15,369 11,448 11,261
Selling and administrative expense 3,886 2,894 2,738
Research and development expense 644 439 417
Interest expense - net 271 208 118
Other (income) expense - net (8) 71 (38)
Income before income taxes 1,884 1,251 1,553
Income tax expense 11 31 201
Net income 1,873 1,220 1,352
Less net income for noncontrolling interests (12) (3) (2)
Net income attributable to Eaton ordinary shareholders $ 1,861 $ 1,217 $ 1,350
Net income per ordinary share
Diluted $ 3.90 $ 3.46 $ 3.93
Basic 3.93 3.54 3.98
Weighted-average number of ordinary shares outstanding
Diluted 476.7 350.9 342.8
Basic 473.5 347.8 338.3
Cash dividends declared per ordinary share $ 1.68 $ 1.52 $ 1.36


Bristol-Myers Squibb
18
Historically, the effective income tax rate is lower than the U.S. statutory rate of 35% due to our decision to indefinitely reinvest the
earnings for certain of our manufacturing operations in Ireland and Puerto Rico. We have favorable tax rates in Ireland and Puerto Rico
under grants not scheduled to expire prior to 2023.

Noncontrolling Interest
See “Note 3 Alliances” for a discussion of our Plavix and Avapro/Avalide partnerships with Sanofi for the territory covering the Americas.
The decrease in noncontrolling interest in both periods resulted from the exclusivity loss in the U.S. of Plavix in May 2012 and Avapro/
Avalide in March 2012. A summary of noncontrolling interest is as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
Dollars in Millions 2013 2012 2011
Sanofi partnerships $ 36 $ 844 $ 2,323
Other 1 14 20
Noncontrolling interest-pre-tax 37 858 2,343
Income taxes (20) (317) (792)
Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interest-net of taxes $ 17 $ 541 $ 1,551


so the only 1 of the 3 that didnt pay taxes was Bristol....and right in their shareholder report they explain why
it helps when you use facts

I did use facts, presented by USAToday, you just didn't like them and went and found some of your own, but you should know that figures lie and liars figure.
 
i detest people, and publications who use "made up facts" to try and score political points

i dont like it when the right does it

i dont like it when the left does it

and i am truly sick of all the corporate bashing that comes out of liberal rags like the usa today

i am one of those people that actually reads quarterly and annual reports from companies

i know...boring ****

most companies pay taxes.....every year (lots of them)

they use tax experts to defer, and alleviate tax burdens

same thing most people on this board probably do with their personal taxes

corporations provide jobs....good jobs....

constantly bashing them in articles like this (made up bull****)

bad idea.....
 
How many corporations effectively pay 35%? And did you even read the op?

Yeah I read it and I quoted it which is what you responded too. What I quoted with in the first sentence.

However corporations are leaving this country not because of low taxes, it's because of high taxes. And Obama is going around claiming anyone that leaves the US to get a lower tax rate is unpatriotic. What is unpatriotic is Obama's refusal to reform the corporate tax laws so companies have no desire to leave.

So whatever your claim is about who pays 35% means nothing, corporations are leaving because of high taxes. Now what is your argument?
 
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/the-insane-u-s--corporate-tax-system-145353359.html

"Merck, the second largest pharmaceutical company in the U.S., actually had a negative effective tax rate of 7.5% during the second quarter, which means it got a tax credit. Eight of the 20 companies were in real estate or real estate-related businesses."

Looks like the "job creator's" are overtaxed.

seems like the best solution is this :

1. charge every corporation a vastly lower rate that is competitive with or even lower than what they're paying in Europe. the ones big enough to find sneaky ways to dodge even the low rate get their products tariffed.

2. all individual income is taxed as income above a cap, including investment income.

that's what i support doing, anyway.
 
Despite widespread groans about the recent disclosure that Apple is finding ways to cut its federal tax bill, an analysis shows the computer giant is one of scores of corporations largely dodging the taxman.

A surprising number of companies in the Standard & Poor's 500, 57, have found ways to pay effective tax rates of zero, according to a USA TODAY analysis of data from S&P Capital IQ.

Corporate giants such as telecom firm Verizon, drugmaker Bristol-Myers Squibb and power management firm Eaton, all reported effective tax rates of 0% during the past 12 months. The findings underscore that while many companies bellyache about the top federal income tax rate of 35%, in reality, many pay much less than that, says Nick Yee of Gradient Analytics. "Investors hope company management is doing everything they can to generate profit, legally," he says. "But the tax code is gray, and there's often no set guidance."


Large companies find ways to a zero tax rate

Great, no taxes, love it.

And the ones that do pay taxes are leaving to get a better tax rate.
 
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/the-insane-u-s--corporate-tax-system-145353359.html

"Merck, the second largest pharmaceutical company in the U.S., actually had a negative effective tax rate of 7.5% during the second quarter, which means it got a tax credit. Eight of the 20 companies were in real estate or real estate-related businesses."

Looks like the "job creator's" are overtaxed.

Why do you 99 percenters bring this tripe into a forum?

A smart person would verify information for accuracy before propagating a journalists lie. The media is untrustworthy today and everyone should know it.

I looked at the first company listed. 2014 Q 2, Merck already paid $947 million in taxes. They expect to pay between $2.5 to 2.8 billion for 2014. I didn't bother checking the other nine. Maybe you should.

http://phx.corporate-ir.net/External.File?item=UGFyZW50SUQ9MjQ0NDgyfENoaWxkSUQ9LTF8VHlwZT0z&t=1
 
I'm sure that market WATCH reads more than gdgyva!

10 U.S. companies paying the least

I noticed one thing at that link that is important. There is a graphic of American Airlines. The page 1 of 12 says:

There are several ways a company can avoid paying taxes. One, the corporation loses large sums of money, and as a byproduct it pays no taxes or even gets tax credits. Another way to get federal tax benefits is through huge fines, mostly for illegal behavior, or behavior the government claims is illegal. Another way is through “acts of God,” such as damage from Superstorm Sandy. 24/7 Wall St. reviewed corporate tax payments for the top 150 companies by revenue. These are the companies paying the least—or no—taxes:

One critical things they failed to say. Reimbursement/credits for federally mandated costs. Like added security after 911.

Now I will look at the other 11 slides.
 
Yeah I read it and I quoted it which is what you responded too. What I quoted with in the first sentence.

However corporations are leaving this country not because of low taxes, it's because of high taxes. And Obama is going around claiming anyone that leaves the US to get a lower tax rate is unpatriotic. What is unpatriotic is Obama's refusal to reform the corporate tax laws so companies have no desire to leave.

So whatever your claim is about who pays 35% means nothing, corporations are leaving because of high taxes. Now what is your argument?

Corporations have no loyalty to America and they want the best of both places as noted by the Tribune below. Btw, taxes is but one reason that corporations seek to move abroad.


Meantime, the billionaires and their tax-exempt front organizations wag their fingers at us voters and at Congress for maintaining one of the highest corporate income tax rates among developed nations. There's a grain of truth to this. Our top rate of 35 percent is higher than rates levied in the tax havens.

Not mentioned is that our effective tax rate — the rate corporations actually pay after taking advantage of loopholes in our tax code — is actually less than most of our competitors' effective rates.

http://articles.chicagotribune.com/...01-20140501_1_tax-haven-corporations-tax-code
 
Last edited:
I noticed one thing at that link that is important. There is a graphic of American Airlines. The page 1 of 12 says:



One critical things they failed to say. Reimbursement/credits for federally mandated costs. Like added security after 911.

Now I will look at the other 11 slides.

Even among corporations that aren't pursing inversions, shifting profits offshore to avoid U.S. taxes is a huge problem. For example, American corporations reported to the IRS that subsidiaries in Bermuda and the Cayman Islands collectively earned profits equal to 16 times the gross domestic product of those countries, according to recent data. It's clearly impossible for companies to earn profits in a country that are exponentially larger than that country's entire economy, further proving companies are using accounting gimmicks to avoid U.S. taxes.

http://edition.cnn.com/2014/07/22/opinion/mcintyre-corporate-tax-loophole-foreign-mergers/
 
Burmuda taxed corporations at zero percent in 2012. That's pretty much impossible for the US to compete with, unless you happen to be one that thinks US businesses enjoying the benefits of doing business in America shouldn't contribute anything, which would be an entirely different topic than the op I realise.
 
Burmuda taxed corporations at zero percent in 2012. That's pretty much impossible for the US to compete with, unless you happen to be one that thinks US businesses enjoying the benefits of doing business in America shouldn't contribute anything, which would be an entirely different topic than the op I realise.

Corporations should be taxed at "0". When dividends are issued to the shareholders they are taxed on that dividend as ordinary income.

Worse yet, and you wonder why Corporations do everything they can to not pay taxes.

Double taxation is a term used to describe the way taxes are imposed on corporate shareholders and on corporations. The corporation is taxed on its earnings (profits), and the shareholders are taxed again on the dividends they receive from those earnings.

There is a continuing discussion about the fairness of taxing dividends in addition to taxing the corporation; note that the corporation itself pays tax on its profits and dividends are taxed to the individual shareholders.

Corporate Double Taxation - Business Tax Law
 
Last edited:
After reading the 10 examples, I really wonder when the bailouts will stop. This appears to be what's going on. Unless the problems are cause by government regulations, then we need to just let them fail instead of wasting tax dollars on them.
 
Corporations should be taxed at "0". When dividends are issued to the shareholders they are taxed on that dividend as ordinary income.
I agree with this. I have argued several times that the owners are double taxed.
 
Back
Top Bottom