• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Lawyer: Police Haven't Talked To Michael Brown Shooting Witness

JasperL said:
This "thug?"

And I agree - it's hard to believe the police haven't interviewed a witness that was a participant in the deadly incident. How do they expect the investigation to be taken seriously if they're not interested in even talking to the witness until days later.
Click to expand...

Thug. A loser with criminal tendencies...
 
Bodhisattva said:
Thug. A loser with criminal tendencies...
Click to expand...

I'll re-post this for your benefit ... you seem to have missed it...

thug
THəg/
noun
1. An inflammatory designation given to all black teens by Fox News ... Often mindlessly repeated by their minions.
See substitutes for the "n" word...
 
Buck Ewer said:
I'll re-post this for your benefit ... you seem to have missed it...

thug
THəg/
noun
1. An inflammatory designation given to all black teens by Fox News ... Often mindlessly repeated by their minions.
See substitutes for the "n" word...
Click to expand...

That is idiotic. Thugs permeate all races. They are losers that walk around with tats, hoodies drawn, pants lowered, etc.

Nice try painting conservatives as racists though it was really a ****ing total fail.
 
Bodhisattva said:
That is idiotic. Thugs permeate all races. They are losers that walk around with tats, hoodies drawn, pants lowered, etc.

Nice try painting conservatives as racists though it was really a ****ing total fail.
Click to expand...


What would you do if african american police were routinely killing white people who were just "walking while white?"

I don't have to think too hard as to your answer.
 
Bodhisattva said:
That is idiotic. Thugs permeate all races. They are losers that walk around with tats, hoodies drawn, pants lowered, etc.

Nice try painting conservatives as racists though it was really a ****ing total fail.
Click to expand...
No need to paint anyone ...they paint themselves...
...thank you...
 
beefheart said:
What would you do if african american police were routinely killing white people who were just "walking while white?"

I don't have to think too hard as to your answer.
Click to expand...

What's the demographic makeup of the rioters in St. Louis?
 
beefheart said:
What would you do if african american police were routinely killing white people who were just "walking while white?"

I don't have to think too hard as to your answer.
Click to expand...
I would take action against the police, not buisnesses and private property.
 
Jerry said:
I would take action against the police, not buisnesses and private property.
Click to expand...

Which is consistent with the views of Brown's family. They, and many more in that community, condemned the violence and urged peaceful protests.
 
Buck Ewer said:
I'll re-post this for your benefit ... you seem to have missed it...

thug
THəg/
noun
1. An inflammatory designation given to all black teens by Fox News ... Often mindlessly repeated by their minions.
See substitutes for the "n" word...
Click to expand...

You didn't seriously do that.
 
clownboy said:
He's not a witness according to police, but a fellow perpetrator. And yes, thug. These are not innocent children though the press have been doing their best to characterize them so.

But it is indeed very suspicious that he isn't under arrest if they did assault the officer as claimed by the police.
Click to expand...

Where did you hear he was in the car with the victim? That was not reported that both were in the car at the same time. You sure you got your version of the events correct?
 
Ikari said:
This is why cops should be required to wear video equipment. If we had video, there would be no question.
Click to expand...

I'm coming around to the idea of cops wearing cameras.

My reluctance has been about the elimination of discretion they represent. No more "catch and release" by cops anymore, which saved my ass more than once.

With cameras, if the catch you you're going to jail. Because prosecutors will demand it and technically cops are supposed to do it now.
 
Montecresto said:
The right wing thinks that if you have a scuffle with the cops, your automatically the aggressor, always. And they will deny that police brutality is a concern.
Click to expand...

The first part of that is what most folks think I believe. As to the last, most folks would say it exists but haven't seen it or experienced it.

Are you seriously here to tell us YOU are different and when you hear about someone who has a fight with the police, you automatically think the police are the aggressors? That says quite a lot about you.
 
beefheart said:
What would you do if african american police were routinely killing white people who were just "walking while white?"

I don't have to think too hard as to your answer.
Click to expand...


Ahh, the racialists set up a malformed strawman and think they have a point. Sad how it's all about color with you folks.
 
1750Texan said:
Where did you hear he was in the car with the victim? That was not reported that both were in the car at the same time. You sure you got your version of the events correct?
Click to expand...

Not from what we know now. First blush info then was they were both involved. Besides, the persons with the main actors in a felony crime generally get the same charges.
 
1750Texan said:
Protesters, rioters or looters? They are not synonymous.
Click to expand...

Do you think they came on separate buses from somewhere else. Alright folks, all protestors on this bus, all rioters on the other bus, and you looters, put that down! :lamo
 
clownboy said:
Ahh, the racialists set up a malformed strawman and think they have a point. Sad how it's all about color with you folks.
Click to expand...

And yet, you still have no way to explain a motive for this teen that justifies his killing. Such deflection.
 
JasperL said:
Can't speak for Buck Ewer, but it doesn't bother me. I don't generally go around and see what everyone's opinion is, then decide if I should think a certain way based on who might or might not agree with me. I'm surprised that's how you go about making decisions. Doesn't make a lot of sense to me, but if you need to be led around like a sheep to know what to think, I guess that's OK.
Click to expand...


Lol...how hypocritcal of you.

You people are the ones struggling to maintain any semblance of objectivity.

You people are the ones who are perpetuating the same type of irresponsible assumptions that led to the riots.

Declaring this cop guilty of all charges based on the mentallity and reaction of the Looters is the opposite of independant analysis BTW.
 
beefheart said:
And yet, you still have no way to explain a motive for this teen that justifies his killing. Such deflection.
Click to expand...

Explain, because that's nonsensical as written.
 
Fenton said:
Lol...how hypocritcal of you.

You people are the ones struggling to maintain any semblance of objectivity.

You people are the ones who are perpetuating the same type of irresponsible assumptions that led to the riots.

Declaring this cop guilty of all charges based on the mentallity and reaction of the Looters is the opposite of independant analysis BTW.
Click to expand...

I'm just noting the witness accounts that indicate Brown was unarmed, shot in the back, then shot multiple times after turning around and his hands up. And days have passed and nothing from the police to contradict any of it. The police haven't interviewed Johnson. We have no autopsy info and no confirmation of how many times and where Brown was shot etc. so based on all that, the evidence supports the "Looters."

On what basis do you think the "Looters" are wrong?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom