- Joined
- Mar 21, 2012
- Messages
- 40,615
- Reaction score
- 9,087
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Re: 80-Year-Old Extremely Pleased About Killing his assailant
Occam's razor?
Your comments are silly.
Everything you said, is that which is invalid.
Motivation? You are apparently speaking to rational motivation, which is different than being caught up in the moment. (Which really isn't rational thought.)
So let me readdress what you think I didn't.
Being caught up in the moment really does not involve such a deliberate thought of vengeance, let alone what is traditionally thought of as vengeance.
Being caught up in the moment in this case was clearly him thinking he was defending himself against violent criminals.
Thinking you are defending yourself is not an act of vengeance, but acting in self-defense.
You are just ridiculously attributing bs to him that just isn't there.
And since you dodged and ignored your being wrong earlier. Lets address that as well.
Follow the quotes this time so you understand what was being spoken to, as it was your failure to follow that lead you to make untrue statements.
Which was in-general standards that each group may be held to. Not shooting someone in the back as you absurdly wanted it to be.
Valid response to your invalid questions?And yet you have no valid response as to the motivation? Occams razor.
Occam's razor?
Your comments are silly.
Everything you said, is that which is invalid.
Motivation? You are apparently speaking to rational motivation, which is different than being caught up in the moment. (Which really isn't rational thought.)
So let me readdress what you think I didn't.
No it isn't.So now getting "caught up in the moment" is not getting revenge?
Being caught up in the moment really does not involve such a deliberate thought of vengeance, let alone what is traditionally thought of as vengeance.
Being caught up in the moment in this case was clearly him thinking he was defending himself against violent criminals.
Thinking you are defending yourself is not an act of vengeance, but acting in self-defense.
Get real. He was not sending a message or trying to send a message.So getting "caught up in the moment" was not to send a message? Come on then what was the motivation for getting "caught up in the moment" a desire to kill someone running away and shooting them in the back?
You are just ridiculously attributing bs to him that just isn't there.
And since you dodged and ignored your being wrong earlier. Lets address that as well.
Follow the quotes this time so you understand what was being spoken to, as it was your failure to follow that lead you to make untrue statements.
Which was in-general standards that each group may be held to. Not shooting someone in the back as you absurdly wanted it to be.
What is absolute nonsense, is you replying while not understanding what is being spoken to.Absolute nonsense. People should not be shooting people in the back who are running away.It shouldn't be when using deadly force. It should be more relaxed for civilians as they are not trained as an Officer is.It is entirely reasonable for civilians to be held to a higher standard that cops.
Do try to keep up.
And at least bother to note what my position is regarding the shooting.