- Joined
- Oct 12, 2006
- Messages
- 14,518
- Reaction score
- 3,438
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
The British played their own game.eace
9 out of 10 apologists agree.
"it was those guys, not us" hahaha
The British played their own game.eace
9 out of 10 apologists agree.
"it was those guys, not us" hahaha
There's nothing for which to apologize.
I don't want my government to try to overthrow other nations democratically elected leaders, especially by arming terrorist
YMMV
As has already been demonstrated, Mossadegh was going down anyway.
your speculation was duly noted.
the fact is, we did those things.
Dear lord, I'm never surprised the extent that apologists for US policy go to justify wrong doing
Decades of failed policy in the ME as well as support for militant Islamists. A region in total flames and you think I'm the desperate one. Yeah cp, just another patronising conservative hawk.
you are paid to study this sort of thing? That makes you a sock puppet in my mind.
That's nice. Do you consider all members of the military to be sock puppets? Or just the ones who are have jobs in which they are required to think?
The relationships between many of the militant groups from Libya into Syria, Iraq, etc., are not completely known or understood.
I would hope all jobs require to think. which ones don't exactly?
PFC's.
But I can't help but notice you didn't answer the question.
I found it either rhetorical or idiotic...not sure which.
I find your presence in these threads tiring and unconvincing.
:roll: says the guy who started this bit by calling someone a sock-puppet.
Let me know when you are willing to answer my question, or defend the abusive and foolish stance with which you began.
this thread isn't about you, it's about how we aided allies of terrorists (and have done so for decades)
Actually no it's not. It's about Rand Paul's foolish claim that we have been arming ISIL in Syria. Look, it's in the title and everything .
This article is what this thread is really about
How Rand Paul’s presidential bid could fundamentally transform the Republican party on foreign policy - The Washington Post
Rand Paul is winning.
What We Learned About Christie, Clinton and Rand Paul This Week - NBC News
Rand Paul is unfit to be President.:roll:
you are unfit to have your opinion matter
Tsk tsk. This forum has rules against personal insults. Since I'm a generous man I'll overlook this one.eace
since you are merely trolling, I would be ok with you reporting me.
your paid analyst/lobbyist failed to offer any evidence, and apparently he is who you deferred to. so what are you still doing here?
Thoughtless know-nothingism should be challenged. I'm doing my duty.eace
you have provided nothing but evidence of your ignorance.
What is without evidence is the allegation that the US has been arming ISIS. Those who would make that charge bear the burden of proof. For those who know the allegation is hogwash, life is simple. It is a logical principle that it is impossible to prove a negative. There is no evidence for us to provide because there is no substance to the claim. It is a product of Paul's fevered imagination or his calculated ambition.eace