- Joined
- Aug 8, 2005
- Messages
- 69,358
- Reaction score
- 53,773
- Location
- Los Angeles
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Re: ISIL seizes Saddam's chemical weapons plant
The difference between being able to be fired into the air and go "KABOOM" and spread huge amounts of deadly chemicals, gas and what not over a very wide area
resulting in massive numbers of casualties (that would be war ready weapons judged to be in active status) and a giant "Oh Sh!t!!" moment inside the bunker
in which just enough of the bad stuff is released (again, inside the confines of the storage area) to render personnel dead.
There, I fixed it!
I don't get it.
1) People say the chemicals in those bunkers are degraded and useless.
2) They also say that it would be too dangerous for ISIS soldiers to even go in those bunkers.
3) How can the chemicals be both "degraded & useless" AND "too dangerous to handle" at the same time?
The difference between being able to be fired into the air and go "KABOOM" and spread huge amounts of deadly chemicals, gas and what not over a very wide area
resulting in massive numbers of casualties (that would be war ready weapons judged to be in active status) and a giant "Oh Sh!t!!" moment inside the bunker
in which just enough of the bad stuff is released (again, inside the confines of the storage area) to render personnel dead.
There, I fixed it!