• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Monica Lewinsky Breaks her Silence

VanceMack said:
You are a crack up. Its going to be ****ing hilarious watching you and others digging the Hillary Clinton "War on Women" meme during the 2016 campaign.
Click to expand...

If you want my opinion about Hillary, perhaps the respect of asking me is in order instead of publicly assuming?
 
It always helps in life to have a little feeling for the welfare of others, even if you're under no such obligation. It is settled law that we aren't required to protect someone from his/her own missteps when making a deal, but here's the thing;

To me, Monica Lewinski always seemed a little childlike, perhaps not extremely bright and most of all, very vulnerable, easily taken advantage of. Perhaps the low self esteem and desperate need for reassurance of the "chubby" girl? How bright could she be when she actually thought she and Clinton had a real "relationship?" At one point, after being exposed, she confided to Linda Tripp that she couldn't understand why Bill didn't call her to re-affirm their feeling for one another in the midst of the storm.

Clinton realized how naive she was and saw that naïveté as a plus for himself. It meant nothing to Clinton, but her life is ruined. No prospective suitor will ever want to be seen with her. She will never have children or a family now. Other women will always talk behind her back. Men will make jokes. She didn't deserve this and my guess is if some money came her way, she would gladly give it up just for a normal life. But she doesn't even have that option.

Clinton is truly a study in a sociopathic lack of any character whatsoever along with the capacity for great cruelty.
 
Last edited:
I always wondered why he risked so much just to hit that little porker. She is (and was then) a total buher. He must have been out of his ****ing mind.

He's a dumb, lying prick, but no way can a 19 year old woman be a victim in such circumstances, unless she was raped. I mean, how old must someone be before we deem them to be fully aware of sexuality? It's a crock of ****. He's a prick, no argument, but she was no victim.
 
MaggieD said:
Well, you should, Top Cat, when it's the President of the United States using his power and station to inflict real harm on a 19-year-old girl. It's an unfair, lopsided relationship of the scummiest kind. He couldn't even choose an equal. So wrong.
Click to expand...

Real harm? :lol:

It was consensual for Pete's sake!
 
Proud South Korean said:
Was Clinton being an ass? Yes, he wasn't the first one to occupy that office and won't be the last. he acted like an ass, he shied away from responsibility, and in general was an ass.
That being said, I have no idea why people are defending Monica Lewinsky. From what I've read she's made a ton of money from the scandal and instead of being a person who was truly emotionally affected by it, she sought out all the attention she could get. Did the international press hound her? Yes, and she enjoyed every minute and dollar of it. It was all consensual and highly unethical. All this crap about being "abused", "not being mentored", "taken advantage of" is just pure crap. She was 22 for God's sake, she had a five-year affair and therefore was not "innocent". She showed up in every TV show she could go to, she wrote a book, she had her own handbag line, and she made millions. No exactly the hurt victim :roll:.
There's nobody to defend here. Clinton and Lewinsky were both asses who were stupid enough to get caught.
Click to expand...

I don't understand the attack of Monica making money off of it. I suppose I would too if I calculated my reputation was forever in the dump because of the worst affair imaginable in the United States. Why not make money off of the American populace after all of that to secure your future? I would.
 
vesper said:
You think? Well here is what I think....it has taken her over a decade to overcome the shame and humiliation. Like she stated it is time to bury the blue dress. She made it perfectly clear it was a consensual relationship between her and Clinton and something she truly regrets. I believe this young woman at the time was overwhelmed by the press coverage and stigmatism that came with it. Now she is forty and it has probably taken all this time to get her head on straight after the brutal beating she received internationally. Cashing in on her fame? What fame? The thing that made her famous is the the thing she most regrets. That makes no sense. The only money she is cashing in is what she received for this article in Vanity Fair? Wow, so much for cashing in. duh.
Click to expand...

Right!

The poor little slut.
 
Amazing how much reaction there is to this old story as evidenced by the number of posts here for example. Ask a kid who Monica is as you will get nothing. I have to agree with the idea the Clintons are behind this knowing (as we all do) Hillary is perhaps the single most ruthless politician in today's America. I think this will have a zero impact on her campaign to rule as morals are a dying breed in America.
 
The question is who will buy this book? There is talk that she will get $12 million for it. But since she already did a book on this some time ago explaining the whole affair this time had to come up with something new so she is going to write about Clinton's fantasies.

Who here would be willing to pay $30 -$50 to read about what Bill's fantasies are?
 
vesper said:
The only money she is cashing in is what she received for this article in Vanity Fair? Wow, so much for cashing in. duh.
Click to expand...

You need to rethink that.
 
VanceMack said:
Actually...you didnt have to answer...I already knew that. Alegations of rape, sexual assault, and sexual harassment, perjury, coersion to commit perjury...none of that matters. All you really care about is the protection of the image of HilBilly. Its why you and others will continue to pretend that whole thing was just about consensual sex and Monica Lewinsky. And thats the point. The war on women rhetoric is going to be laughable coming from her. Watching people lap it up...thats going to be priceless.
Click to expand...

DO you really think Monica Lewinski was a case of sexual harassment. A case of one way unwelcome advances?

She was a 22 year old college graduate that had already had a multiyear long affair with a married man. She was not an innocent.
 
year2late said:
DO you really think Monica Lewinski was a case of sexual harassment. A case of one way unwelcome advances?

She was a 22 year old college graduate that had already had a multiyear long affair with a married man. She was not an innocent.
Click to expand...
Where did I say Monica Lewinsky involved a case of sexual harassment? Oh...wait...you dont KNOW he was already on TRIAL for sexual harassment when this all came out?
 
year2late said:
"Monica Lewinsky breaks silence" page after page.

Forget google. When was the last time you heard anything her before she broke her silence?
Click to expand...

Why forget google? It proves that for over a decade someone was writing about her usually in a bad light whether it be her weight problem or the butt end of a bad joke. The last interview I know of was with Barbara Walters in 1999.
 
Crosscheck said:
You need to rethink that.
Click to expand...

Crosscheck just last year someone reported Lewinsky's net-worth was $500,000. That hardly sounds like someone who cashed in on the affair.
 
rhinefire said:
Amazing how much reaction there is to this old story as evidenced by the number of posts here for example. Ask a kid who Monica is as you will get nothing. I have to agree with the idea the Clintons are behind this knowing (as we all do) Hillary is perhaps the single most ruthless politician in today's America. I think this will have a zero impact on her campaign to rule as morals are a dying breed in America.
Click to expand...
I think you are mistaken. The more this gets talked about, the more Paula Jones, Gennifer Flowers, Kathleen Wiley, Juanita Broderick, and whoever besides his wife he is ****ing todaywill come out. Hilary's response to all of them will come out. Her response to Bob Packwoods 'victims' as "whiny bitches" for daring to complain about being groped and grabbed will come out. Theres a whole lot that people willfully ignore about HilBilly's behaviors throughout Bills political career and all that 'stuff' is likely to come out.
 
VanceMack said:
Actually...you didnt have to answer...I already knew that. Alegations of rape, sexual assault, and sexual harassment, perjury, coersion to commit perjury...none of that matters. All you really care about is the protection of the image of HilBilly. Its why you and others will continue to pretend that whole thing was just about consensual sex and Monica Lewinsky. And thats the point. The war on women rhetoric is going to be laughable coming from her. Watching people lap it up...thats going to be priceless.
Click to expand...

The "war on women" rhetoric has always been laughable from her.

I've heard Lynne Cheney's theory that the timing of the Vanity Fair piece might have been at the suggestion of the Clinton camp. That's certainly possible.

It's also true that Monica Lewinsky was no innocent. But I remember the fid clips of the time, the ones that showed her out in the crowd and just adoring the President. And that's the thing: She was a kid young enough to be his kid, and she was a fangirl with a crush. He exploited that.

And he was the President of the United States, a longtime serial philanderer with no respect for women and a penchant for bimbos (hence his own people coining the phrase "bimbo eruptions"). And he did it in MY office, not upstairs. Just disgusting and contemptible.
 
Lutherf said:
So after 20 years she decides to spill all the secrets? She chooses to do so two years before Hillary hits full blown campaign mode? That's convenient:roll:

If this isn't some kind of deal to dispose of Hillary baggage before the campaign I'll eat my hat.
Click to expand...
Hope she is the wrench in Billary's run. Too bad dead Americans don't get this much coverage.
 
VanceMack said:
Where did I say Monica Lewinsky involved a case of sexual harassment? Oh...wait...you dont KNOW he was already on TRIAL for sexual harassment when this all came out?
Click to expand...

I apologize, I was multitasking and misread.
 
Last edited:
nota bene said:
The "war on women" rhetoric has always been laughable from her.

I've heard Lynne Cheney's theory that the timing of the Vanity Fair piece might have been at the suggestion of the Clinton camp. That's certainly possible.

It's also true that Monica Lewinsky was no innocent. But I remember the fid clips of the time, the ones that showed her out in the crowd and just adoring the President. And that's the thing: She was a kid young enough to be his kid, and she was a fangirl with a crush. He exploited that.

And he was the President of the United States, a longtime serial philanderer with no respect for women and a penchant for bimbos (hence his own people coining the phrase "bimbo eruptions"). And he did it in MY office, not upstairs. Just disgusting and contemptible.
Click to expand...
Thats I think one of the remarkable things about this whole affair. Monica was a young impressionable stupid 22 year old. She was a woman that Bill Clinton himself classified as a 'child' (remember-Bill Clinton declared in is 13 children a day die by gunfire statistic that 'children' are anyone aged 0-26 years old). But throughout...SHE has never claimed to be a poor innocent victim. Was she victimized? Hell yes...by everyone. Even people in this thread that would get matching Clinton tattoos and bless the ground they walk on are disrespectful of her. It wasnt his fault. He was really the victim. She seduced him....blah blah...bull****.
 
CRUE CAB said:
Hope she is the wrench in Billary's run. Too bad dead Americans don't get this much coverage.
Click to expand...

It is kind of funny that a number of posts back someone expressed concern that Monica was harassed by the press for years . Who exactly will be harassing her over the affair?
 
What's with the "will be" if the harassment was in the past?

And let's face it: Lewinsky has been a national joke for decades now.
 
Fiddytree said:
I don't understand the attack of Monica making money off of it. I suppose I would too if I calculated my reputation was forever in the dump because of the worst affair imaginable in the United States. Why not make money off of the American populace after all of that to secure your future? I would.
Click to expand...

I must have misphrased it. I was attacking her for willingly having an affair. As for her making money offof it, I was pointing this out for those who claim that she's suffering and is a victim.
 
year2late said:
DO you really think Monica Lewinski was a case of sexual harassment. A case of one way unwelcome advances?

She was a 22 year old college graduate that had already had a multiyear long affair with a married man. She was not an innocent.
Click to expand...

They weren't unwelcome advances. But since you brought up her affair that began in her senior year of high school with her teacher who was much older than her and married has similarities to her affair with Clinton. Both men were much older and married. Both men were in a position of authority over her. Is it insecurities of older men that will allow them to prey on younger girls who show infatuation for them? Or is this about an insecure woman who acted out foolishly or both?
 
year2late said:
It is kind of funny that a number of posts back someone expressed concern that Monica was harassed by the press for years . Who exactly will be harassing her over the affair?
Click to expand...

Don't know, don't care. But I just hope they keep running that lying bastard Clinton pointing his finger in the camera.
 
It's funny how politics change things...

Take a retail store manager and have him sleep with his 20+ year younger, but of age, sales person and you have people upset that it's unethical because a superior messed around with his subordinate.

Take an office executive and have him sleep with his 20+ year younger, but of age, secretary and you have people upset that it's unethical because a superior messed around with his subordinate,

Take a President and have him sleep with his 20+ year younger, but of age, intern and you have people blaming the intern because she wanted it and made money off it later.
 
NoC_T said:
I always wondered why he risked so much just to hit that little porker. She is (and was then) a total buher. He must have been out of his ****ing mind.

He's a dumb, lying prick, but no way can a 19 year old woman be a victim in such circumstances, unless she was raped. I mean, how old must someone be before we deem them to be fully aware of sexuality? It's a crock of ****. He's a prick, no argument, but she was no victim.
Click to expand...

Let's agree that Monica was no victim here. Do you believe Hillary was a victim? Seems to me the Clintons and those promoting Hillary for numerous "jobs" have classed here as the loyal wife, willing to forgive her man to save her marriage and family. Considering that Hillary has hung onto Billy Boy's coat tails for decades as a means to her political ambitions/ends, I'd consider her a conniving bitch who milks it for all she can. As for Monica being a little "porker" - have you had a look at Hillary? Perhaps Billy Boy isn't turned off by a little meat on the bones, so to speak.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom