- Joined
- Jul 21, 2005
- Messages
- 51,710
- Reaction score
- 35,488
- Location
- Washington, DC
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
If a CEO wants to have an affair, that is between him and his spouse.
So are ones sexual actions in ones private life the only thing that is "private"? Why singular on this.
What, exactly, is the difference between being offended by a political view a CEO stated on his private time in a private conversation (that becomes known) and being offended by an illicite action a CEO did in his private time in a private situation (that becomes known)?
That's what confuses me. People were morally outraged by a political action done by an individual, not by the company or on behalf of the company, and demanded action taken against a CEO....yet some of those same type of people seem to have an issue with people being morally outraged by a sexual action done by an individual, not by the country or on behalf of hte country, and suggest people were wrong to call for action.
I'm fine with the notion that a persons private life is their private life...it just confuses me how people on BOTH sides of the aisle seem to like to find excuses and justifications to ignore and erase that notion whenever it suits their purposes.