- Joined
- Jul 27, 2011
- Messages
- 54,864
- Reaction score
- 43,211
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Hey man its your dime
I would buy this before spending money on this jerk
Is that really a book? SMH ....
Hey man its your dime
I would buy this before spending money on this jerk
Well, if Sharpton writes a book, he better write better than he speaks or no one will be able to understand what he is trying to say.
I have to agree, your post is the very embodiment of 'bigot'. Thank you for the demonstration.
I once did the math on how much money she wanted for 'free' condoms and it came out to getting laid over 300 times per day, every day. Yeah that meets the criteria "slut" imo.
I see no mention of free condoms in her testimony. She mentions an annual cost of over $3000 for contraceptives which is probably the cost of the exams and prescriptions required to use oral contraceptives, an IUD or some other methods.
Have any of you actually read what she said?.
Of course not. He's simply repeating the right wing nut talking points he heard on right wing nut job radio.
Is that really a book? SMH ....
Of course not. He's simply repeating the right wing nut talking points he heard on right wing nut job radio.
Yes, we've been over it thoroughly: http://www.debatepolitics.com/us-political-scandal-du-jour/120600-why-slut-fatal-rush.htmlI see no mention of free condoms in her testimony. She mentions an annual cost of over $3000 for contraceptives which is probably the cost of the exams and prescriptions required to use oral contraceptives, an IUD or some other methods.
Have any of you actually read what she said?
About $10 gets a box of 36 condoms at walmart. So $3,000 = 10,800 condoms / 3 years = 3,600 condoms / 365 days in a year = ~10 condoms per day.
So she's having sex 10 times a day and complaining that she's having so much more sex than that, she can't afford additional condoms.
And that's not accounting for any instance the man provides the condom.
Yes, this conclusively proves that she is indeed a "slut".
Assuming Ms. Fluke's budget of $1,000 per year, the higher cost of $50 per month of 'the pill', and the previous Wall-Mart quote for condoms at $10pr box of 36:
The Pill: $50 pr/mo X 12 months = $600
The remaining $400/$10pr box = 1440 condoms / 365 days in a year = ~4 condoms per day.
So Ms. Fluke is having totally protected sex, pill and condom, 4 times per day with no days off for 3 years straight.
Yes, this defines her as a "slut".
Yes, we've been over it thoroughly: http://www.debatepolitics.com/us-political-scandal-du-jour/120600-why-slut-fatal-rush.html
I was wrong, she wasn't having sex 300 times per day, but 10 times per day. That's still qualifies her as a slut:
I will, if you can tell me how her testimony is directly relevant to the children's book this thread is about. Does Fluke mention the book? Does the book mention Fluke? Is the book about safe-sex and BC? Is Fluke's testimony about US history?Read her actual testimony in posts #480 & 481
I should note that Fluke used the $3K figure for during law school, not per year.
I will, if you can tell me how her testimony is directly relevant to the children's book this thread is about. Does Fluke mention the book? Does the book mention Fluke? Is the book about safe-sex and BC? Is Fluke's testimony about US history?
Increasing her GPA one prof at a time?
It's unfortunate you believe all those lies about Rush Limbaugh. Stay in your fantasy land, then :2wave:As I said in post#238 "If the books are presented as pure fiction, or are historically accurate, I have no issue with the choice. If he misrepresents history to support arguments for the socially harmful aspects of his worldview (ie. his nationalism, racism and sexism), then I find it objectionable. As long as the Children’s Book Council is not funded by taxpayers they have the right to choose any authors."
As I also said before, I do not want to give any of my money to Rush or anyone like him who uses his position to spread lies and nationalism, racism and sexism. The Fluke episode is an example of how much of a sexist and sleazy liar he is.
It's unfortunate you believe all those lies about Rush Limbaugh. Stay in your fantasy land, then :2wave:
It's unfortunate you believe all those lies about Rush Limbaugh. Stay in your fantasy land, then :2wave:
Jerry, if you can go to a website that shows videos of Rush making all of those comments, would you still believe them to be lies? Or maybe a site that has audio files of Rush making those comments, would you think that they were purposely altered to create a lie?
Right, those quotes don't make him sexist or etc. That's his irreverent humor, not sincerely held beliefs. Half the show is satire like The Daily Show (well ok 90% of the Daily Show is satire while Limbaugh actually discusses real news more).The Fluke comments by Rush I quoted are from Rush's own website.
I never said the quotes were fake. I said those quotes were of Limbaugh's humor. You are accurately quoting satire and then treating that satire as if it's real. You do this simply because you don't share the sense of humor nor agree with them man's political views.Jerry, if you can go to a website that shows videos of Rush making all of those comments, would you still believe them to be lies? Or maybe a site that has audio files of Rush making those comments, would you think that they were purposely altered to create a lie?