• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

World War 3 possible Ukraine-Russia?

Since you're comparing Obama to stalin, didn't Stalin commit genocide in eastern Ukraine and repopulate with Russians?
The same Russians who want to secede from Ukraine today ?

Obama is comparable to Stalin that Obama is doing the same thing that Stalin did during the 1930's, changing the purpose and character of the military, purging the officers corps for political reasons, politicizing the military by using it for social engineering and establishing political officers aka diversity officers and fearing the military and ordering that bolts be removed from Marines rifles.
 
We need to eliminate Islam from the world?

No, just point out that the cancer of radical Islam is slowly spreading throughout the world, and waiting.

Have you been to England? France? Spain? Middle easterners will be the majority soon, and that allows the radicals to fester and strategize freely. Moderate Muslims are scared to death of them.
 
Obama is comparable to Stalin that Obama is doing the same thing that Stalin did during the 1930's, changing the purpose and character of the military, purging the officers corps for political reasons, politicizing the military by using it for social engineering and establishing political officers aka diversity officers and fearing the military and ordering that bolts be removed from Marines rifles.

4x04.gif
 
Obama is comparable to Stalin that Obama is doing the same thing that Stalin did during the 1930's, changing the purpose and character of the military, purging the officers corps for political reasons, politicizing the military by using it for social engineering and establishing political officers aka diversity officers and fearing the military and ordering that bolts be removed from Marines rifles.

Right because Obama executed tens of thousands of officers, made the military his own political weapon, orchestrated the false confessions and trials of his former party comrades and the old guard, tortured and massacred millions, and in general destroyed his own country.
Also, Obama is a Marxist.
 
Except that in a global poll, Americans considered Iran the biggest threat to world peace, that's how well US government propaganda works on the domestic audience. The rest of the world considers the US to be the greatest threat to world peace.

Of course, the poll would have been conducted in Iran or Russia or China :roll:. Are you sad that the Soviet Union lost the Cold War and not that evil Americans?
 
Not much going on this weekend, when is WWIII coming on the tube. CNN? Fox? MSNBC? Military Channel?
 
Yea, I bet they thought the same thing in Russian Georgia.

The two situations are somewhat similar, but different enough for your comment to hold no real merit. The situations were dramatically different leading up to Russia putting troops on the ground in South Ossetia and then striking Georgia.
 
Last edited:
Obama is comparable to Stalin that Obama is doing the same thing that Stalin did during the 1930's, changing the purpose and character of the military, purging the officers corps for political reasons, politicizing the military by using it for social engineering and establishing political officers aka diversity officers and fearing the military and ordering that bolts be removed from Marines rifles.

At the risk of getting dinged I have just got to say this is the one of the most retarded things I've ever seen posted on this forum. At no point does anything you've said in this post come even remotely close to reality.
 
Right because Obama executed tens of thousands of officers, made the military his own political weapon, orchestrated the false confessions and trials of his former party comrades and the old guard, tortured and massacred millions, and in general destroyed his own country.
Also, Obama is a Marxist.

Obama's father was a Marxist. Obama's mother was a communist sympathizer who refused to have sex with white men. Obama did associate with Marxist during his college years and launched his political career in the house of a Marxist terrorist (Weatherman) and even had avowed communist like Van Jones as part of the Obama White House administration.

But the MSM gave Obama a complete pass on his hidden unknown past and the liberals/progressives ignored Obama's policies on how Obama viewed the world and how Obama wants the world to be like, they were more concerned with putting a black man in the White House not taking in what the consequences would be.
 
The two situations are somewhat similar, but different enough for your comment to hold no real merit. The situations were dramatically different leading up to Russia putting troops on the ground in South Ossetia and then striking Georgia.

I think you just like saying no ones opinions hold no merit. Otherwise you are full of it. A take over is a take over. It may unfold differently, there may end up being no shooting, but Ukraine will fall none the less.
 
At the risk of getting dinged I have just got to say this is the one of the most retarded things I've ever seen posted on this forum. At no point does anything you've said in this post come even remotely close to reality.

A LINO, I knew it. The liberal PC word police have declared the word retarded to be politically incorrect.

But some of us know the official policy of the left is "Do as I say not as I do."
 
Yet as my Dad used to say to me when I was an Air Force brat:
"I would fight and die for Apacherat's right to say what he said".

It makes me wonder how Mr. Obama can be equated to every known genocidal tyrant to live in the last Century.
My older buddies from Vietnam were able to let go of that part of the Mental hurt of being abandoned.

I've oftened mentioned to Apache he needs to go back to some VA Homes and Hospitals to see how good he has it.
He would be received in a welcoming and tearful way .
At the risk of getting dinged I have just got to say this is the one of the most retarded things I've ever seen posted on this forum. At no point does anything you've said in this post come even remotely close to reality.
 
As I just mentioned to Lerxst, it's time for you to go see some of your brothers and sisters who are confined to VA units.
Besides, donating, volunteering, and means-testing is the only way to decrease VA costs.

You know I have decades of experience with my Dad in the VA and have seen too much with our disabled veterans.
I've told you before I don't want to see you bitter at the end, if this is the real you .
A LINO, I knew it. The liberal PC word police have declared the word retarded to be politically incorrect.

But some of us know the official policy of the left is "Do as I say not as I do."
 
At the risk of getting dinged I have just got to say this is the one of the most retarded things I've ever seen posted on this forum. At no point does anything you've said in this post come even remotely close to reality.

Here's the like to compensate the ding. I was on the verge of something similar but decided it was not worth it.
Apparently You-Know-Who failed to recognize the sarcasm in my post and goes on in a rant about how Obama IS a Marxist. Extra points for completely failing the address the majority of my post which proved how his analogy failed completely. Other extra points for not being able to even define Marxism.
 
You...don't know them? It could be that your goals and his are not the same. It could be that your idea of how he's done in achieving his goals are not the same as his. It could be that your idea of what has transpired could be different from other people.

Like maybe he wants the US to be the best in exactly the same ways you want it to be the best, using the exact same measurements, but he just sucks at getting things done. And so many other options in between. Maybe you suck at thinking what the best is? And so many options in between.

If you want to be taken seriously, you need to do better.



The question was whether or not he's succeeding or failing.

Those are the options that I see as real world outcomes of any effort. You seem to think there are other options aside from these real world outcomes.

What are they?
 
Good, as it should be.



Iran's reaction to this will be rational and measured and they will get a nuke.

The Obama Administration reaction to this will be irrational, unguided and constantly surprised. Those are the constant defining factors of the Obama Foreign policy.

I would guess that if the question was put to Obama as to whether or not he sees his actions as providing an incentive to Iran to continue developing a nuke, he would be absolutely flummoxed and deny that this could ever happen. This why he has such a deplorable record in maintaining our standing in the world. He simply does not get it.
 
Prove different. He has done NOTHING for the US as president.

So? Let's say you're right and he's done NOTHING. Does that mean his goal is to the weaken the US?
 
The question was whether or not he's succeeding or failing.

Succeeding or failing in a goal that you haven't proven that he actually has. You just said something funny and alarmist.
 
Succeeding or failing in a goal that you haven't proven that he actually has. You just said something funny and alarmist.



That is true. It is difficult to tell if this loser has any goals at all.

The country that is suffering from his lack of direction and goals is hurting.

I foolishly assume that he has the goal of creating an environment in which the American people can prosper and be safe.

You astutely have pointed out that he has never demonstrated that he has any goals in these areas at all.
 
Oh? I thought you said his goal was the weaken the US?



I was judging his goals by the real world results.

That is unfair. You are correct. He has not demonstrated that he has any goals whatever to improve anything in the real world for the country. As such, it is not fair to judge him by any standard that would measure improvement.

If we assess his results as representing his goals, then my statement is correct, but that makes an assumption. We can't assume that his goal is to do what he is doing. Our only justified assumption is that what he is doing is what he is doing. His inmost motivations are known but to him.

Your sig line is a good one.
 
So you assumed he was very effective in his goal? So he succeeds where he wants to?



You have astutely recognized that judging either success or failure is impossible to calculate when a man has no goals.
 
Back
Top Bottom