If there are, I haven't seen any. And that isn't surprising.
The 4th amendment is very clear: "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
A true scholar might disagree with my interpretation of it and have something historical to back up their opinion with. Some writings from the Framers for instance. Maybe a piece of common law which better defines what words meant at the time.
But someone hiding behind their law degree might just say something like: "Well, we need this for national security, this is the mainstream view, we have had wartime powers before...."
In other words, they can't actually debate the Constitution but instead use their law degree as an appeal to legal authority.