• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164, 712]

Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

My comments are not ad hominems. An ad hominem would be calling someone a name without accuracy or foundation...as you have done with Mr. Nye
I'm not in an argument with that piece of **** in the first place.


What I have done here is to assess you based on your posts and retorts and given a hypothesis as to what you are.
When you can demonstrate any level of discourse that is above average intellect I will consider the validity of a self administered online IQ test .
So far you have been sadly lacking.
So you still refuse to take the test.
 
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

There you go lying again. Nothing you said in that post is factual.
Again the equivalence of the schoolyard retort " Liar liar pants on fire".
If my post is not factual demonstrate where it is not.
Surely a genius would have no problem.
 
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

I'm not in an argument with that piece of **** in the first place.
Ad hominem ... again.:lamo


So you still refuse to take the test.
I have taken lots of IQ tests but unlike you I do not feel the need to rest my laurels on a self administered, easy to cheat at, online ego massage.
The numbers I have achieved in the past are not so different from those you claim.:lamo
 
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

Again the equivalence of the schoolyard retort " Liar liar pants on fire".
If my post is not factual demonstrate where it is not.
Surely a genius would have no problem.
Been fun toying with you. But I'm bored with you now. Your concession is accepted. Period.
 
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

Been fun toying with you. But I'm bored with you now. Your concession is accepted. Period.
No i don't believe it was fun for you at all... You have not demonstrated any convincing arguments at all, and you desperately cling to an unsupervised internet IQ test as a flimsy self-proclamation of your intellect. You have had ample opportunity to demonstrate said intellect here with sadly disappointing results.
The concession comes from you with your lack of compelling argument .
Good night.
 
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

No i don't believe it was fun for you at all... You have not demonstrated any convincing arguments at all, and you desperately cling to an unsupervised internet IQ test as a flimsy self-proclamation of your intellect. You have had ample opportunity to demonstrate said intellect here with sadly disappointing results.
The concession comes from you with your lack of compelling argument .
Good night.
Your consession is respectfully accepted.
 
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

there are profiles of particular members of internet forums. Often they elevate their own importance, often using faked or irrelevant information, to make up for failures in real life. These people tend to try to feel better about their pathetic lives by trolling using bigoted statements and imagery and attacking almost anyone or anything. Trolling is the highlight of their days and when confronted with facts often claim victory.

Some aspects of these sad people is that they are easily swayed by fellow trolls, leading to being truthers, birthers, or general conspiracy believers. While claiming genius level intelligence they often can't handle understanding the facts in evidence if it disturbs their "special knowledge" that, in their minds, they and only a select few can fully understand.

I think it is cruel to continuing to feed the delusions of these people.
 
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

Wait a minute isnt this the guy who is always boasting about sleeping with young girls half his age? Yet somehow Bill Nye is a pedophile because he has a childrens show?
 
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

Actually no, I did not. I merely expressed my suspicion. I never accused him of any such thing. Everyone with adequate reading comprehension skills can clearly see that.

I accused him of disseminating disinformation to kids and provided a link to it.
I am truly impresed by your mental prowess. You're a member of MENSA no doubt.
 
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

Wait a minute isnt this the guy who is always boasting about sleeping with young girls half his age?
If I was 20 you would have a point. But I'm 46. Girls half my age are not children.
 
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

Just a public service reminder:
uhynyva3.jpg

Bahahahahahahahahaha. You're getting bitch slapped by an entire thread, so you start challenging people to an online IQ test. How ridiculously pathetic is that.

03.png


Based on his limited ability to effectively debate and his childish one or two word retorts I would put Muhammed's IQ at about 100... maybe lower...Yeah Justin Bieber beats him.

Been fun toying with you. But I'm bored with you now. Your concession is accepted. Period.

I am truly impresed by your mental prowess. You're a member of MENSA no doubt.


Moderator's Warning:
Just a small sample size of the trolling going on amongst a large amount of people in this thread and it needs to end. The IQ of other posters and demanding people take "tests" has ZERO to do with the topic and need to stop. Thinking that a posters views are dumb, or that their arguments are ridiculous and insulting to their non-forum member targets, does not give you persmission to troll and flame them upstairs. There's a thread topic and people need to actually start spending posts discussing that rather than trolling each other into continued basement level back and forth
 
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

What you can't seem to understand is that I never used my suspicion as an argument against his anti-science nonsense. I merely provided evidence of him faking an experiment.

Reading comprehension. Maybe you could take a special class or something.

Yes you did. You were intentionally trying to slander a man.

By the way, he fired back, too. I have reading comprehension. However, I do not have time for lies and mudslinging.

Way to answer any of my questions, too.
 
Last edited:
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

Yes you did. You were intentionally trying to slander a man.
Wrong. I was just expressing my sincere concerns about his suspicious behavior. And I explain why I had those concerns.

By the way, he fired back, too. I have reading comprehension. However, I do not have time for lies and mudslinging.
Yes, I was aware of his excuses. That's old news. It doesn't change the fact that the experiment was faked. Of note is that he didn't do the experiment he claims he did on video.

Another misleading thing he did to scare kids was use pure CO2 in the experiments he says he performed. That is misleading because CO2 is a trace gas. It's less than 1% of the Earth's atmosphere.

O my friends, I have received numerous messages asking about the voice-over I did for the Climate Reality Project. My voice describes an experiment or demonstration that I’ve performed several times over the last 15 years. You can put pure carbon dioxide in a vessel, illuminate it with a bright hot lamp, and its temperature will be a few degrees warmer than an identical vessel filled with air. (I once did it with pure methane; the temperature rose in that vessel as well.)

Also of note is that he made other of ridiculous scary claims in the video that are not backed up be science. Yet he stated them as fact.

The clown was obviously trying to frighten children. That's abuse. And I'm concerned about his motives for wanting to do that.
 
Last edited:
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

^ So now teaching science to children = molestation.

You are sick.
 
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

Another misleading thing he did to scare kids was use pure CO2 in the experiments he says he performed. That is misleading because CO2 is a trace gas. It's less than 1% of the Earth's atmosphere.
If I put a bag over your head, the CO2 levels will rise very quickly....for a short time at least!
 
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

^ So now teaching science to children = molestation.
I disagree. Could you explain the reasoning that you used to come to the conclusion that teaching science to children = molestation?
 
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

I disagree. Could you explain the reasoning that you used to come to the conclusion that teaching science to children = molestation?

That wasn't MY conclusion. That was your ridiculous premise that you're now fleeing from like rats from a sinking ship.
 
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

That wasn't MY conclusion. That was your ridiculous premise that you're now fleeing from like rats from a sinking ship.
You have it backwards dude. :lamo

I'm not the one who insinuated that Bill Nye was teaching science to kids in the video. In fact, I said just the opposite.
 
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

That wasn't MY conclusion. That was your ridiculous premise that you're now fleeing from like rats from a sinking ship.

I think it's extremely clear that he's trolling us here now. Just a few pages back he really did equate teaching "bad science" to child abuse, along with suggesting he's a pedophile. Now he's trying to claim the exact opposite.

It's like 30 people vs muhammed, so I think we should just stop feeding him.

If I put a bag over your head, the CO2 levels will rise very quickly....for a short time at least!

For the love of god, please do!
 
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

Wrong. I was just expressing my sincere concerns about his suspicious behavior. And I explain why I had those concerns.

Yes, I was aware of his excuses. That's old news. It doesn't change the fact that the experiment was faked. Of note is that he didn't do the experiment he claims he did on video.

Another misleading thing he did to scare kids was use pure CO2 in the experiments he says he performed. That is misleading because CO2 is a trace gas. It's less than 1% of the Earth's atmosphere.



Also of note is that he made other of ridiculous scary claims in the video that are not backed up be science. Yet he stated them as fact.

The clown was obviously trying to frighten children. That's abuse. And I'm concerned about his motives for wanting to do that.

Nothing was misleading about that experiment. The goal was not to simulate a planet's response to atmospheric changes on your frigging kitchen table. The goal was to show children the greenhouse effect.

When a kid put baking soda in a clay model of a volcano for a science fair, did you start yelling at him for lying to everyone? "THATS NOT A REAL VOLCANO! RAAARRRR"
 
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

I think it's extremely clear that he's trolling us here now. Just a few pages back he really did equate teaching "bad science" to child abuse, along with suggesting he's a pedophile. Now he's trying to claim the exact opposite.
Actually I said junk science which is synonymous with pseudoscience. It's not science at all. It's just BS in the guise of science.

It's like 30 people vs muhammed, so I think we should just stop feeding him.
So now you are resorting to a bandwagon fallacy, another ad hominem and asking others to concede with you.
 
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

Actually I said junk science which is synonymous with pseudoscience. It's not science at all. It's just BS in the guise of science.

So now you are resorting to a bandwagon fallacy, another ad hominem and asking others to concede with you.

Assigning evil motivations to bill Nye is also a fallacy. The idea that the intention is to scare children is purely your opinion, you have no evidence that this is the case. Nobody said that children should be frightened, nobody stated this goal. You assigned it.

If I start assigning you evil motivations, are you going to complain about ad hominem and fallacies?
 
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

I found a few funnies about the debate I though I'd share.....

Bill+Nye+is+a+cool+guy.+lliB_889713_5012938.jpg




Science+Intensifies.+In+the+last+few+frames+Bill+Nye+looks_c15d5c_5012812.gif





5012812+_f31320901cfc2b65df687a6d43ddfa9d.png
 
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

I found a few funnies about the debate I though I'd share.....

View attachment 67161811




Science+Intensifies.+In+the+last+few+frames+Bill+Nye+looks_c15d5c_5012812.gif





5012812+_f31320901cfc2b65df687a6d43ddfa9d.png

The second one really didn't characterize Nye's behavior at all. I don't even know what the third one means.
 
Back
Top Bottom