There's no contradiction on my part therefore nothing to defend.
The contradiction is quite clear. You claim we agree I didn't say something, but support your post which relies on what we both claim I didn't say. That's the contradiction.
Funny, you accuse me of accusations which is what you're doing now.
No, I'm not accusing you of anything, I'm simply pointing out what you did. You, however, are falsely accusing me of multiple things (strawman, false premise), while never attempting to refute the fact I was right about your contradiction.
Nice contradiction based on nothing.
See previous quote I already provided.
Yet another contradiction based on nothing.
I can't help but notice you didn't provide a single word from the article to show the delegates were picked because of their sexuality and not their merits. Not one shred of evidence and yet you accuse me of contradiction. :roll:
It's really simple. You claim the OP (article and poster) said the delegates were picked because they were homosexual and it had nothing to do with merit. I said prove it. You can't. You lose.
You don't discuss, you take a contrary position
I take the correct position. If you would discuss in facts and not fiction, mine wouldn't be a contrary position. I can't help it you are always wrong, at least on the things you debate with me. If you would try using facts, then we'd have no problem.
because you think you know everything.
I don't know everything, but in the last two discussions we've had, I've clearly known more than you. Or, in this case, it'd be more accurate to say I comprehended what I read better than you.
Why I replied or that I replied is irrelevant.
:lamo
Wow, that's some great spin. You claim I take a contradictory position for no reason, but the fact you instigated this debate is not relevant. Amazing...do you really believe what you said here or is this an attempt to save face? Honest question.
You're comment was clear and obvious
But obviously it wasn't clear and obvious to you, because you didn't understand it. Or, if you did understand it, you blatantly misrepresented what I said.
Contradiction is not debate. Learn the difference.
And stating facts is not debate, nor is it inherently contradictory. As I said earlier in this post, if you would simply discuss the truth and not fiction, there'd be no contradiction. But BOTH times we've debated in the last week or so, YOU replied to ME. So the only person being contradictory is you, and you're doing it using fiction.
Of course I'm wrong in your view - isn't everyone wrong in your view?
Not if they simply rely on facts and truth.
I cannot help but notice you're not even attempting to debate the topic anymore and your post is little more than personal attacks on me. You cannot even try to discuss facts because the facts show you are wrong in every way.
I'll spend time debating, until that, you're just wasting time (or trolling - w/e). Reply's I make to you bore me - you add no value to the discussion other than to take an opposite position. Have fun wasting other peoples time.
And yet, I'm STILL waiting for you to support your contradictory claim that these delegates were picked because of their sexuality and not their merits. I wonder why you haven't...actually, that's not true, I know exactly why you haven't. The reason you haven't is the same reason you're using the same tired Internet cliche of "you're not worth my time" you used in our last debate...you're wrong and it's hard for one to admit when they are wrong.
Just do both of us a favor and admit you were wrong and then we can discuss this using actual facts and not made up narratives.
