• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Dis is how they do it in the UK...

Mr.Nick

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 25, 2012
Messages
7,908
Reaction score
1,764
Location
Chicago
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian
I hardly ever get so disgusted I feel the need to post an article.

Apparently the people of the UK and their judicial system are so ****ing brainwashed that they don't realize this murdering bastard is a psychotic twisted **** that views non-Muslims as "animals" as the Qur'an dictates.

‘This Is How We Kill Our Animals in Islam’: Accused Killer in British Soldier’s Horrific Hacking Death Gives Twisted Defense | TheBlaze.com

You have to love the crazy ass psychiatrists diagnosis.

Seriously:

CNN reported that during the trial, forensic psychiatrist Tim McKinley described the defendant as polite and showing no signs of a mental disorder, remorse or regret. The defendant reportedly assured McKinley that while he still poses a threat to the British military, he is not a threat to civilians, police or medical staff.

^^ That **** should have their license to practice revoked.

The man killed someone for absolutely no reason other than to appease Muhammad, using the rational that non-Muslims are animals (hence he's not guilty of murder) and a quack agreed and apparently that is good enough for the Brits and their progressive ways to digest..
 
The psychiatrist should have his license revoked because the perp isn't a psycho just a violent asshole?
 
The psychiatrist should have his license revoked because the perp isn't a psycho just a violent asshole?

He justified murder on behalf of the murdering islamofascist.

Yes, if a ****ing shrink cant understand the concept of a hate crime and premeditated murder because they're so ****ing PC - they should have their license revoked. Of course that will never happen because I'm sure shrinks are unionized in the UK.
 
I hardly ever get so disgusted I feel the need to post an article.

Apparently the people of the UK and their judicial system are so ****ing brainwashed that they don't realize this murdering bastard is a psychotic twisted **** that views non-Muslims as "animals" as the Qur'an dictates.

‘This Is How We Kill Our Animals in Islam’: Accused Killer in British Soldier’s Horrific Hacking Death Gives Twisted Defense | TheBlaze.com

You have to love the crazy ass psychiatrists diagnosis.

Seriously:



^^ That **** should have their license to practice revoked.

The man killed someone for absolutely no reason other than to appease Muhammad, using the rational that non-Muslims are animals (hence he's not guilty of murder) and a quack agreed and apparently that is good enough for the Brits and their progressive ways to digest..

1. Acting as though these psychopaths represent England or that this has anything to do with progressivism is stupid on your part. You need to calm down and read this like an adult and maybe you'd understand it better.

2. The doctor is only saying that the guy is fit to stand trial. He doesn't suffer from any mental health defects that could possible get him out of jail time and in to a half way house or something like that. The Dr. isn't saying that the guy is innocent or didn't do anything wrong. You're accusing him of defending the guy when he did nothing more than give a professional diagnosis. You're childish, irrational reading is way off.
 
He justified murder on behalf of the murdering islamofascist.

Yes, if a ****ing shrink cant understand the concept of a hate crime and premeditated murder because they're so ****ing PC - they should have their license revoked. Of course that will never happen because I'm sure shrinks are unionized in the UK.
He didn't justify the murder. You don't know what you're talking about. Being stupid and violent isn't a mental disorder, that's all the doctor was saying.
 
"No signs of mental disorder" would mean the perp was able to stand trial and couldn't plead insanity, at least in the US. In Britain, it probably means the same thing.
 
1. Acting as though these psychopaths represent England or that this has anything to do with progressivism is stupid on your part. You need to calm down and read this like an adult and maybe you'd understand it better.

2. The doctor is only saying that the guy is fit to stand trial. He doesn't suffer from any mental health defects that could possible get him out of jail time and in to a half way house or something like that. The Dr. isn't saying that the guy is innocent or didn't do anything wrong. You're accusing him of defending the guy when he did nothing more than give a professional diagnosis. You're childish, irrational reading is way off.

Seriously???

Are you still trying to rationalize what happened?

Is your knee-jerk reaction to defend this barbaric killer.
 
I hardly ever get so disgusted I feel the need to post an article.

Apparently the people of the UK and their judicial system are so ****ing brainwashed that they don't realize this murdering bastard is a psychotic twisted **** that views non-Muslims as "animals" as the Qur'an dictates.

‘This Is How We Kill Our Animals in Islam’: Accused Killer in British Soldier’s Horrific Hacking Death Gives Twisted Defense | TheBlaze.com

You have to love the crazy ass psychiatrists diagnosis.

Seriously:



^^ That **** should have their license to practice revoked.

The man killed someone for absolutely no reason other than to appease Muhammad, using the rational that non-Muslims are animals (hence he's not guilty of murder) and a quack agreed and apparently that is good enough for the Brits and their progressive ways to digest..

Did you know that in the UK we have something called a "trial" and another thing called "court of law."

If an accused person (even if spotted on camera committing a crime) claims to be innocent, they are entitled (whatever we feel about them or their views) to be tried before a court and their guilt or innocence proven.

So... even though the two were videoed with bloody hands, talking of how they had killed Rigby, they claimed to be innocent and we are now pursuing something called "due process."

I don't know which part of the world you are from but we stopped using lynch mobs a couple of hundred years ago. When you reach the 21st century you might "try" it too.
 
The man killed someone for absolutely no reason other than to appease Muhammad, using the rational that non-Muslims are animals (hence he's not guilty of murder) and a quack agreed and apparently that is good enough for the Brits and their progressive ways to digest..


Well, given that the trial continues, we won't know whether anything is good enough for anyone until a verdict is reached. I guess your type would prefer it if any Moslem accused of terrorism-related crimes were not allowed to call defence witnesses.

I'm sure you'll see it as a capitulation to Islam when the two guys on trial are sentenced to life imprisonment.
 
"No signs of mental disorder" would mean the perp was able to stand trial and couldn't plead insanity, at least in the US. In Britain, it probably means the same thing.

That's not a plea of insanity - that is a plea of justification - using the logic that non-Muslims are animals, hence he's not guilty of murder and the quack thought that was ****ing rational apparently.
 
I hardly ever get so disgusted I feel the need to post an article.

Apparently the people of the UK and their judicial system are so ****ing brainwashed that they don't realize this murdering bastard is a psychotic twisted **** that views non-Muslims as "animals" as the Qur'an dictates.

‘This Is How We Kill Our Animals in Islam’: Accused Killer in British Soldier’s Horrific Hacking Death Gives Twisted Defense | TheBlaze.com

You have to love the crazy ass psychiatrists diagnosis.

Seriously:



^^ That **** should have their license to practice revoked.

The man killed someone for absolutely no reason other than to appease Muhammad, using the rational that non-Muslims are animals (hence he's not guilty of murder) and a quack agreed and apparently that is good enough for the Brits and their progressive ways to digest..

You are confusing the shrink saying that the criminal action was not caused by mental illness as somehow condoning the criminal action. Actually, the reverse (your position?) is more ridiculous - saying that simply committing such a crime is grounds for an insanity plea. ;)
 
Well, given that the trial continues, we won't know whether anything is good enough for anyone until a verdict is reached. I guess your type would prefer it if any Moslem accused of terrorism-related crimes were not allowed to call defence witnesses.

I'm sure you'll see it as a capitulation to Islam when the two guys on trial are sentenced to life imprisonment.

What are you looking for? precedence for Sharia in the UK?
 
You are confusing the shrink saying that the criminal action was not caused by mental illness as somehow condoning the criminal action. Actually, the reverse (your position?) is more ridiculous - saying that simply committing such a crime is grounds for an insanity plea. ;)


The man killed someone using the logic that non-Muslims are animals hence the person he killed wasn't a person so he's not guilty based on what he believes, because progressives will buy it.
 
What are you looking for? precedence for Sharia in the UK?

Me? No, but I'm sure you'd be delighted.

I'm looking for a right to a fair trial, something I'm sure you are fundamentally opposed to.
 
The man killed someone using the logic that non-Muslims are animals hence the person he killed wasn't a person so he's not guilty based on what he believes, because progressives will buy it.

Yet the shrink is clearly shooting holes in that defense tactic by stating that the defendant clearly knows the difference between a human and an animal. Now if the shrink said that the defendant thought he was really killing poison snakes then I would likely have a problem with that shrink. ;)
 
Seriously???

Are you still trying to rationalize what happened?

Is your knee-jerk reaction to defend this barbaric killer.


Do you think he does have a mental disorder, and therefore eligible to plead insanity?

I think the psychiatrist was right: The perp is not insane, and needs to be locked up in prison. Since they don't have the death penalty in Britain, he will simply spend the rest of his life in prison. What would you have them do to him?
 
Me? No, but I'm sure you'd be delighted.

I'm looking for a right to a fair trial, something I'm sure you are fundamentally opposed to.

Fair trial?? the man who committed this murder has been straight up honest.

In the US this is a clear death penalty case attached with a hate-crime.
 
Fair trial?? the man who committed this murder has been straight up honest.

You only have half the story then - the two murderers claimed they were not guilty - thus a trial ensues.

-- In the US this is a clear death penalty case attached with a hate-crime.

So you would send someone straight to the chair from a lower court even if they claimed they are not guilty?

Without a trial to prove their guilt? Why are you not shocked or angry at that?
 
Yet the shrink is clearly shooting holes in that defense tactic by stating that the defendant clearly knows the difference between a human and an animal. Now if the shrink said that the defendant thought he was really killing poison snakes then I would likely have a problem with that shrink. ;)

Do you think he does have a mental disorder, and therefore eligible to plead insanity?

I think the psychiatrist was right: The perp is not insane, and needs to be locked up in prison. Since they don't have the death penalty in Britain, he will simply spend the rest of his life in prison. What would you have them do to him?

It makes you think that Mr Nick may be a poe, wanting an insanity plea to allow those two murderers to escape responsibility for their actions. Everything I've seen of this case (which is a lot!) suggests to me that they are sane, rational fanatics and hence completely responsible for their heinous crime, but I'll wait to see what the jury decides before suggesting they should be gaoled for life.
 
Do you think he does have a mental disorder, and therefore eligible to plead insanity?

I think the psychiatrist was right: The perp is not insane, and needs to be locked up in prison. Since they don't have the death penalty in Britain, he will simply spend the rest of his life in prison. What would you have them do to him?

Yes, I do believe he does, it's called islamofascism, which is similar to progressive socialism.

This **** is trying to justify killing an individual and the shrink buys it...

This clown deserves to hang on a rope...
 
It makes you think that Mr Nick may be a poe, wanting an insanity plea to allow those two murderers to escape responsibility for their actions. Everything I've seen of this case (which is a lot!) suggests to me that they are sane, rational fanatics and hence completely responsible for their heinous crime, but I'll wait to see what the jury decides before suggesting they should be gaoled for life.

WHAT?

I'm not an advocate of capital punishment but this man deserves to die because in US law (or at least Illinois law) he meets every criteria for a shot in the arm.
 
In the US this is a clear death penalty case attached with a hate-crime.

It would be in Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia and a number of other brutal régimes too. The trial's in the UK, what relevance does the US have to this?
 
You only have half the story then - the two murderers claimed they were not guilty - thus a trial ensues.



So you would send someone straight to the chair from a lower court even if they claimed they are not guilty?

Without a trial to prove their guilt? Why are you not shocked or angry at that?

Is this enough for you?

Woolwich-620x361.jpeg
 
WHAT?

I'm not an advocate of capital punishment but this man deserves to die because in US law (or at least Illinois law) he meets every criteria for a shot in the arm.

And so what? This is not the US, and US law sucks donkey balls and is thankfully not enforced outside the US, despite the US right wanting it to be.

This is a trial, and they have the right to defend themselves in any way they want. They will be convicted because of the evidence against them, so this is nothing but a show by them in a vain attempt to justify their actions. It is called justice, something I suspect you dont know much about.
 
WHAT?

I'm not an advocate of capital punishment but this man deserves to die because in US law (or at least Illinois law) he meets every criteria for a shot in the arm.

He's not in the US. The UK does things differently. Some would say better, some would say worse, all would say different.
 
Back
Top Bottom