• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Dis is how they do it in the UK...

I don't believe you understand how crucial political correctness is to the children we call "democrats" in the US, but which have other party names in other countries . I think you proved my point with your confusion.

Progressives are incapable of judging a black Muslim....
Dude, I'm a progressive and I think the guy should be tried in court and go to jail for the rest of his life or be put to death. You are talking non-sense.
 
This is satire surely?

If I wanted to post satire - I'd do it on facebook or twitter where my progressive friends and family members could gwak at it while reprising their role "Americas Most Gifted."
 
I'm angry at the attempt to justify the actions... In an attempt to use PC ideas as a defense.

But saying he is sane is not justification for doing the action, if anything the opposite.
 
But saying he is sane is not justification for doing the action, if anything the opposite.

That isn't the defense...

The defense is justification - weather or not a non-muslim is a human or a pig....
 
That isn't the defense...

The defense is justification - weather or not a non-muslim is a human or a pig....
The killer is the one trying to justify it, not the doctor.
 
The killer is the one trying to justify it, not the doctor.

The "Doctor" er "quack" is doing a good job helping this sociopath.

I suppose this quack recommends that this clown say in a facility owned and run by him at the taxpayers coin?


$$$$$ is evolution...
 
That isn't the defense...

The defense is justification - weather or not a non-muslim is a human or a pig....

BBC News - Lee Rigby trial: Adebolajo says victim was 'first soldier spotted'

"We exited the vehicle and I am not sure how I struck the first blow. The most humane way to kill any creature is to cut the jugular, this is what I believe, this is how we kill our animals in Islam.

"He may be my enemy but he is a man... so I struck at the neck and attempted to remove his head."
 
The guy is NOT INSANE and he damn well committed premeditated murder. His head belongs in a museum, while his body belongs in the dirt. That POS quackjob is just as guilty for even attempting to justify the murder.

But, didn't you just say the same thing that the "POS quackjob" said? The dirtbag is not insane. You both agree with that. Since he is not insane, he should take his punishment.
 
The "Doctor" er "quack" is doing a good job helping this sociopath.

I suppose this quack recommends that this clown say in a facility owned and run by him at the taxpayers coin?


$$$$$ is evolution...
No he's not. If the doctor said he had a mental disorder there might be grounds for an insanity plea.
 
Last edited:
The "Doctor" er "quack" is doing a good job helping this sociopath.

I suppose this quack recommends that this clown say in a facility owned and run by him at the taxpayers coin?


$$$$$ is evolution...

I have been reading your original post and the replies. I am somewhat confused by your stance on this. The responders to your original post have been polite and patient, pointing out to you that you have misinterpreted the essence of this story.

Psychiatrist: The man is not insane.
You: The man is not insane.

Psychiatrist: Because I have found that the man is not insane, he should stand trial for murder, not be institutionalised (that's what he means by deciding the man is not insane).
You: The man should not be sent to an institution because he is not insane and should be punished for murder.

Can you please explain to me exactly how what you think, disagrees with what the doctor thinks? You both think he is sane and should stand trial for murder. One simply cannot declare the murderer guilty and enact punishment when the murderer stated that he is innocent. While the murderer believes that he IS innocent because he did not target a civilian, he targeted a soldier and most likely considers himself to be a soldier, at war with the British military, that does not mean that anyone responding to your post also believes the same thing.There must be a trial, even if that trial is a formality because the video evidence, the murderer's own words and witnesses will be enough to convict him of murder.

You are angry at a murder commited in daylight in front of witnesses and you want justice. We all do. It's just that most of us understand the necessity of due process. Not one post that I have read in this thread is defending the murderer or believes the murderer is insane, ergo, should not be punished. Unlike you, who has somehow misinterpreted not only the doctor but every poster here, we are just waiting patiently for justice to be carried out. It has also been pointed out to you that the murder did not occur in the US, therefore, US laws and capital punishment have nothing to do with this case.

Do you understand now?
 
He justified murder on behalf of the murdering islamofascist.

Yes, if a ****ing shrink cant understand the concept of a hate crime and premeditated murder because they're so ****ing PC - they should have their license revoked. Of course that will never happen because I'm sure shrinks are unionized in the UK.

I bet he's been peer reviewed at some point.. LOL

This is why the discipline we call psychology is a farce.. It's why two independent psychologists with access to the same data can come up with completely opposite interpretations. The fact we allow them to testify in court still to this day boggles my mind.


Tim-
 
Back
Top Bottom