1.)Not really. If the insurance is more expensive, someone is paying for it. *hint* those paying premium (the employer).
2.)Who is paying for the medical coverage to cover BC? The individual paying the premium. Who is paying a large portion of the premium? The employer. So, yes. The employer is being forced to provide free BC to their employees or harm their business by not providing medical coverage.
3.)Hobby Lobby (HL) is buying the expected usage of all medical needs covered under their plan. The expected results can be / are modified based on actual losses. So, the insurance company can (and does) modify rates based on actual usage. When free BC is offered and some of HL's employees are expected make use of that new benefit, Hobby Lobby's premiums will be more - hence they are paying for BC for their employees.
4.)Not sure what you named, but if they are medically necessary to prevent abnormal medical issues, they are not defined as choice. Again, BC for treatment of a medical condition has to be covered.
5.)It's not up to the employee to make a choice of what is in their coverage. The employer makes the choices when he contracts with the insurance company. Part of that contract is to sign and pay the premium. There are many choices that an employer makes when contracting with the insurance company. I assume you believe this is wrong too?
6.) When you are providing it to me, you have the right to make certain choices. You can only make choices on things that are not medically necessary.
7.)Nope. If they offer insurance to families, bastard kids of the employees would also be covered. If they offer coverage to employees, they would also have to offer coverage to employees that are unmarried and pregnant. This is completely irrelevant to the discussion of a medically unnecessary (in most cases) BC pill.
1.) yes really its meaningless the price of the coverage is meaningless to the discussion it has ZERO barring.
2.) repeating this lie will never make it true lol they are paying (depending on the company, so pay a lot some pay very little) for COVERAGE, period.
ALso the employer isnt being forced to do anything, they are choosing to run a business which has nothing to do with religion.
3.) nope just coverage, all the double talk in the world wont change this and you didnt answer my question either you talked around it, ill ask it AGAIN.
are you claiming that hobby lobby is buying everything and anything under the coverage then? thats an insane claim see previous posts
and the reason why i ask this is because i could point out other things that "supposedly" impact religion
4.) its two post back this is just another dodge so your point is moot.
but i simply re-asked again below, oh wait YOU SKIPPED IT!, i wonder why? why did you skip the question "C.) should Hobby lobby get to decided if vasectomy and Tubal Ligation are covered in anyway either?"
doesnt matter ill keep asking thes questions till you answer them
5.) ANSWER THE QUESTION lol
if employers at hobby lobby get to choose whats in the employees COVERAGE, what will that be based on?
6.) more double talk and basing things on your subjective opinion and no facts, i will ask again
what gives me the right to choose whats in your coverage? (not the packages i buy, what is in your coverage)
7.) my religion doesnt allow me to condone that though? i cant condone unwed mothers, premarital sex and bastard children
so no its 100% relevant because it shines light on the completely BS religious argument
you havent given one logical or factual reason why i should have the right to decide whats in your coverage based on my religion and ignoring yours and your individual liberty and rights, not one
to make it easier ill repeat all the questions:
A.) are you claiming that hobby lobby is buying everything and anything under the coverage then? thats an insane claim see previous posts about examples
B.) should Hobby lobby get to decided if vasectomy and Tubal Ligation are covered in anyway either?
C.) if employers at hobby lobby get to choose whats in the employees COVERAGE,
what will that be based on?
D.) what gives me the right to choose whats in your coverage? (not the packages i buy, what is in your coverage)
E.) my religion doesn't allow me to condone that though? i cant condone unwed mothers, premarital sex and bastard children so why should i have to buy coverage that covers anything to do with that? i mean they can just buy coverage else where right?
F.) me religion doesn't allow me to condone other gods, why should i have to buy coverage that covers people of another religion, im condoning their sins? i mean they can just buy coverage else where right?
sorry its absurd to think HL's religion can be forced on their employees coverage