Amandi
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2013
- Messages
- 905
- Reaction score
- 333
- Location
- Delaware
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Liberal
I kinda se eyour point, however it doesn't address the core of my question. My question concerned why it's important for two of the same sex to have a traditional marriage if it's not important for that marriage to have the traditional participants.
The main reason is civil unions do not protect their rights the same as a marriage does especially when dealing with other states. Health care choices can be denied to the same sex partner in other states then the one issuing the civil union. Problems can come up with inheritance and custody as well.
A lesser concern with mine is I do not believe in "seperate but equal". There should not be two different ways of doing the same thing in the law.